GENIC HETEROGENEITY WITHIN ELECTROPHORETIC "ALLELES" AND THE PATTERN OF VARIATION AMONG LOCI IN DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURASINGH RS.1979; GENETICS; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 93; NO 4; PP. 997-1018; BIBL. 3 P.Article

EVALUATION OF THE STEPWISE MUTATION MODEL OF ELECTROPHORETIC MOBILITY: COMPARISON OF THE GEL SIEVING BEHAVIOR OF ALLELES AT THE ESTERASE-5 LOCUS OF DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA.JOHNSON GB.1977; GENETICS; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 87; NO 1; PP. 139-157; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

MULTIPLE INSEMINATION AND MALE SEXUAL SELECTION IN NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA.COBBS G.1977; AMER. NATURALIST; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 111; NO 980; PP. 641-656; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

THE PHOTOSENSITIVITY OF A MUTANT CIRCADIAN CLOCK.WINFREE AT; GORDON H.1977; J. COMP. PHYSIOL.; GERM.; DA. 1977; VOL. 122; NO 1; PP. 87-109; BIBL. 24 REF.Article

PHOTORESPONSE IN RELATION TO EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN IN SIBLING SYMPATRIC SPECIES OF DROSOPHILASEIGER MB; SEIGER LA; KERTESZ JA et al.1983; AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST; ISSN 0003-0031; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 109; NO 1; PP. 163-168; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

LIGHT DEPENDENT MATING INHIBITION IN THE WHITE-EYE MUTANT OF DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURADEJIANNE D; PRUZAN HOTCHKISS A; GROSSFIELD J et al.1981; EXPERIENTIA; ISSN 0014-4754; CHE; DA. 1981; VOL. 37; NO 5; PP. 465-466; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

A MODEL FOR DISPERSION EXPERIMENTSMANLY BFJ.1977; OECOLOGIA; DEU; DA. 1977; VOL. 31; NO 1; PP. 119-130; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF AGE, REARING AND MATING EXPERIENCES ON FREQUENCY DEPENDENT SEXUAL SELECTION IN DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA.PRUZAN A.1976; EVOLUTION; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 30; NO 1; PP. 130-145; BIBL. 2 P.Article

SUBSTRATE-SPECIFIC ENZYME VARIATION IN NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA.SINGH RS.1976; GENETICS; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 82; NO 3; PP. 507-526; BIBL. 2 P. 1/2Article

CHROMOSOMAL AND BEHAVIORAL STUDIES OF MEXICAN DROSOPHILA. I. VAGILITY CHARACTERISTICS OF THREE POPULATIONS OF D. PSEUDOOBSCURAROCKWELL RF; DE LA ROSA ME; AKIN E et al.1983; BEHAVIOR GENETICS; ISSN 0001-8244; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 13; NO 2; PP. 197-204; BIBL. 2 P.Article

THE FOUNDER-FLUSH SPECIATION THEORY: AN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH.POWELL JR.1978; EVOLUTION; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 32; NO 3; PP. 465-474; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

FURTHER STUDIES ON GENE POLYMORPHISM IN THE MAINBODY AND GEOGRAPHICALLY ISOLATED POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA.SATYA PRAKASH.1977; GENETICS; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 85; NO 4; PP. 713-719; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

ALLELIC HETEROGENEITY WITHIN ALLOZYMES SEPARATED BY ELECTROPHORESIS IN DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA.MCDOWELL RE; SATYA PRAKASH.1976; PROC. NATION. ACAD. SCI. U.S.A.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 73; NO 11; PP. 4150-4153; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

POPULATION GENETICS OF DROSOPHILA AMYLASE. IV: SELECTION IN LABORATORY POPULATIONS MAINTAINED ON DIFFERENT CARBOHYDRATESPOWELL JR; ANDJELKOVIC M.1983; GENETICS; ISSN 0016-6731; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 103; NO 4; PP. 675-689; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

ECOLOGICAL VARIABLES AFFECTING THE DISPERSAL BEHAVIOR OF DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA AND ITS RELATIVESDOBZHANSKY T; POWELL JR; TAYLOR CE et al.1979; AMER. NATURALIST; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 114; NO 3; PP. 325-334; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

A COMPARISON OF PHOTORESPONSE IN SIBLING SYMPATRIC SPECIES OF DROSOPHILASEIGER MB; SEIGER LA.1979; AMER. NATURALIST; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 114; NO 6; PP. 893-901; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

EXAMINATION OF ALLELIC VARIATION AT THE HEXOKINASE LOCI OF DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA AND D. PERSIMILIS BY DIFFERENT METHODS.BECKENBACH AT; PRAKASH S.1977; GENETICS; U.S.A.; DA. 1977 PARU 1978; VOL. 87; NO 4; PP. 743-761; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE ESTERASE-5 LOCUS IN DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA, D. PERSIMILIS AND D. MIRANDA.COBBS G; SATYA PRAKASH.1977; GENETICS; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 85; NO 4; PP. 697-711; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

ALLELIC VARIANTS AT THE XANTHINE DEHYDROGENASE LOCUS AFFECTING ENZYME ACTIVITY IN DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA.SATYA PRAKASH.1977; GENETICS; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 87; NO 1; PP. 159-168; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE UNIT CHARGE MODEL OF PROTEIN POLYMORPHISM AND ITS RELATION TO THE ESTERASE. 5 LOCUS OF DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA, DROSOPHILA PERSINISLIS AND DROSOPHILA MIRANDA.COBBS G; PRAKASH S.1977; GENETICS; U.S.A.; DA. 1977 PARU 1978; VOL. 87; NO 4; PP. 717-742; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

GENETICS OF NATURAL POPULATIONS. XLIII. FURTHER STUDIES ON RATES OF DISPERSAL OF DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA AND ITS RELATIVES.POWELL JR; DOBZHANSKY T; HOOK JE et al.1976; GENETICS; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 82; NO 3; PP. 493-506; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

A note on barometric pressure and behavior in Drosophila pseudoobscuraANKNEY, P. F.Behavior genetics. 1984, Vol 14, Num 3, pp 315-317, issn 0001-8244Article

POPULATION GENETICS OF MEXICAN DROSOPHILA. V: A HIGH RATE OF MULTIPLE INSEMINATION IN A NATURAL POPULATION OF DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURALEVINE L; ASMUSSEN M; OLVERA O et al.1980; AM. NAT.; ISSN 0003-0147; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 116; NO 4; PP. 493-503; BIBL. 27 REF.Article

R- AND K-SELECTION IN DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURATAYLOR CE; CONDRA C.1980; EVOLUTION; ISSN 0014-3820; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 34; NO 6; PP. 1183-1193; BIBL. 28 REF.Article

MODIFIERS AND "SEX RATIO" IN DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURAPOLICANSKY D; DEMPSEY B.1978; EVOLUTION; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 32; NO 4; PP. 922-924; BIBL. 20 REF.Article