INDIVIDUALIZATION IN A LARGE INTRODUCTORY MICROBIOLOGY COURSEVOYLES MM; WRIGHT ER.1975; SCI. EDUC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 59; NO 1; PP. 1-4Article

THE EFFECTS OF STUDENT TUTORS ON LEARNING BY UNIT MASTERY INSTRUCTIONAL METHODSCARLSON JG; MINKE KA.1974; PSYCHOL. REC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 24; NO 2; PP. 533-543; BIBL. 7REF.Article

INDIVIDUALIZED SCIENCE INSTRUCTION: RATIONALE AND DEFINITIONSTEDMAN CH.1974; SCI. EDUC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 58; NO 4; PP. 593-599; BIBL. 15REF.Article

UNDERSTANDING THE DYNAMICS OF INITIATING INDIVIDUALIZED SCIENCE INSTRUCTIONKAPUSCINSKI BP.1982; JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING; ISSN 0022-4308; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 19; NO 8; PP. 705-716; BIBL. 2 P.Article

SOME EFFECTS OF A PERSONALIZED SYSTEM OF INSTRUCTION IN TEACHING COLLEGE MATHEMATICSHARRIS MB; LIGUORI RA.1974; J. EDUC. RES.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 68; NO 2; PP. 62-66; BIBL. 17REF.Article

PERSONALIZATION IN SCIENCE: PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION AT THE MIDDLE SCHOOL LEVEL.LINN MC; CHEN B; THIER HD et al.1976; INSTRUCT. SCI.; NETHERL.; DA. 1976; VOL. 5; NO 3; PP. 227-251; BIBL. 26 REF.Article

ADAPTING INSTRUCTION TO STUDENT DIFFERENCES IN AN INDIVIDUALIZED SCIENCE PROGRAM.SHEEHAN DS; HAMBLETON RK.1977; J. RES. SCI. TEACHG; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 14; NO 1; PP. 27-32; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

THE EFFECT OF DIFFERING CRITERIA FOR UNIT EXAM MASTERY ON COLLEGE TEST PERFORMANCE.CARTER E; TELAAK CARTER K; COUTURE E et al.1976; J. EXPER. EDUC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 44; NO 3; PP. 54-57; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

ANALYSIS OF THE UNIT TESTING COMPONENT OF THE PERSONALIZED SYSTEM OF INSTRUCTION.MACLIN J; WILLIAMS R; CLARK L et al.1976; J. EXPER. EDUC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 44; NO 3; PP. 49-53; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

INDIVIDUALIZING ASSESSMENT OF THE LEARNING PATH OF STUDENTS USING COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNINGBROWN KG.1982; EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT; ISSN 0013-1644; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 42; NO 3; PP. 845-848; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

INDIVIDUALIZED LEARNING METHODS IN PERSPECTIVEMELTON RF.1981; HIGH. EDUC.; ISSN 0018-1560; NLD; DA. 1981; VOL. 10; NO 4; PP. 403-423; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

PSI-PROBLEMS IN PRACTICE.SHEPARD WO; POPP A.1976; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 38; NO 1; PP. 297-298; BIBL. 1 REF.Article

THE RELATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF INDIVIDUALIZED AND TRADITIONAL INSTRUCTION METHOD.JERNSTEDT GC.1976; J. EDUC. RES.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 69; NO 6; PP. 211-218; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF INDIVIDUALIZED INSTRUCTION UPON LOW- AND HIGHT ACHIEVING STUDENTS, STUDY BEHAVIOR, AND STUDENTS' EVALUATION OF MASTERY. = EFFETS DE L'INSTRUCTION INDIVIDUALISEE SUR DES ETUDIANTS A REUSSITE FAIBLE ET ELEVEE, LE COMPORTEMENT D'ETUDE ET L'EVALUATION PAR LES ETUDIANTS DE LEUR MAITRISE DU SUJETFERNALD PS; DUNANN DH.1975; J. EXPER. EDUC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 43; NO 4; PP. 27-34; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

AN ANALYSIS OF QUALITIES OF SELF-DIRECTEDNESS AS RELATED TO SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS OF I.S.C.S. STUDENTSMCCURDY DW.1975; SCI. EDUC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 59; NO 1; PP. 5-12; BIBL. 3REF.Article

AN EXAMINATION OF THE BASIC ASSUMPTIONS OF "INDIVIDUALIZED" INSTRUCTION.CHASTAIN K.1975; MOD. LANGUAGE J.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 59; NO 7; PP. 334-344; BIBL. 63 REF.Article

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MEDIA AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN LEARNERS: CAN WE RELATE THEM.HEIDT EU.1980; INST. SCI.; ISSN 0020-4277; NLD; DA. 1980; VOL. 9; NO 4; PP. 365-391; BIBL. 2 P.Article

A META-ANALYSIS OF OUTCOME STUDIES OF KELLER'S PERSONALIZED SYSTEM OF INSTRUCTIONKULIK JA; KULIK CLC; COHEN PA et al.1979; AMER. PSYCHOLOGIST; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 34; NO 4; PP. 307-318; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

AMOUNT AND DISTRIBUTION OF STUDY IN A PERSONALIZED INSTRUCTION COURSE AND IN A LECTURE COURSEBORN DG; DAVIS ML.1974; J. APPL. BEHAV. ANAL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 7; NO 3; PP. 365-375; BIBL. 13REF.Article

INDIVIDUALIZED INSTRUCTIONAL SYSTEMS USED BY XEROX.BURGWARDT FC.1976; J. TECH. WRITG COMMUNIC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 6; NO 4; PP. 327-337Article

ON THE SPECIFICATION OF PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES IN INDIVIDUALIZED FOREIGN LANGUAGE INSTRUCTION.VALDMAN A.1975; MOD. LANGUAGE J.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 59; NO 7; PP. 353-360; BIBL. 24 REF.Article

STUDENT PERFORMANCE AND ATTITUDES IN A CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT COURSETAYLOR P.1975; J. EXPER. EDUC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 43; NO 3; PP. 55-60; BIBL. 8REFArticle

EVALUATION OF THE INDIVIDUALIZED EDUCATION PROGRAM. A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH FOR SPECIAL SERVICE TEAMSMAHER CA; BARBRACK CR.1980; PSYCHOL. SCH.; ISSN 0033-3085; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 17; NO 4; PP. 485-490; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

INDIVIDUALIZED INSTRUCTION. ITS EFFECTS UPON ACHIEVEMENT AND INTEREST IN BEGINNING COLLEGE SPANISH.NIEMAN LL; SMITH WF.1978; MOD. LANGUAGE J.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 62; NO 4; PP. 157-167; BIBL. 1 P.Article

PERSONALIZATION OF INSTRUCTION BASED UPON COGNITIVE STYLE MAPPING: IMPLICATIONS FOR EDUCATIONAL GERONTOLOGYBASS RK.1978; EDUC. GERONTOL.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 3; NO 2; PP. 109-124; BIBL. 32 REF.Article