CAN EQUITY THEORY EXPLAIN THE QUALITY AND THE STABILITY OF ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS.LUJANSKY H; MIKULA G.1983; BRITISH (THE) JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0144-6665; GBR; DA. 1983; VOL. 22; NO 2; PP. 101-112; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

COUNTERING INEQUITY WITH INEQUITY: OVER-REWARDING GENEROSITY AND UNDER-REWARDING GREEDGREENBERG J.1982; EUR. J. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0046-2772; NLD; DA. 1982; VOL. 12; NO 2; PP. 181-185; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

HANDLING NEGATIVE INPUTS: ON THE PLAUSIBLE EQUITY FORMULAE.HARRIS RJ.1976; J. EXPER. SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 12; NO 2; PP. 194-209; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

THE RESPONSE TO INJUSTICE: EFFECTS OF VARYING LEVELS OF SOCIAL SUPPORT AND POSITION OF ADVANTAGE OR DISADVANTAGESTEIL JM.1983; JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0022-1031; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 19; NO 3; PP. 239-253; BIBL. 2 P.Article

THE EFFECTS OF CONTROL ON PERCEIVED FAIRNESS OF PROCEDURES AND OUTCOMESMUSANTE L; GILBERT MA; THIBAUT J et al.1983; JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0022-1031; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 19; NO 3; PP. 223-238; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

EQUITY THEORY AND THE ALLOCATION OF REWARDS BETWEEN GROUPSSIK HUNG NG.1981; EUR. J. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0046-2772; NLD; DA. 1981; VOL. 11; NO 4; PP. 439-443; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

ANOTHER FOLLY FOR EQUITY THEORYALESSIO JC.1980; SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0147-829X; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 43; NO 3; PP. 336-340; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

THE EFFECT OF FUTURE INTERACTION ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF REWARDS.VON GRUMBKOW J; DEEN E; STEENSMA H et al.1976; EUROP. J. SOC. PSYCHOL.; NETHERL.; DA. 1976; VOL. 6; NO 1; PP. 119-123; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

EQUITY JUDGMENT: A REVISION OF ARISTOTELIAN VIEWSMELLERS BA.1982; J. EXP. PSYCHOL., GEN.; ISSN 0096-3445; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 111; NO 2; PP. 242-270; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

LONG-RANGE IMPACT OF FAIR SELECTION STANDARDS ON MINORITY EMPLOYMENTLEDVINKA J; MARKOS VH; LADD TT et al.1982; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0021-9010; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 67; NO 1; PP. 18-36; BIBL. 2 P.Article

REVERSAL IN PREFERENCE RESPONSES TO TWO TYPES OF INJUSTICE SITUATIONS: A METHODOLOGICAL CONTRIBUTION TO EQUITY THEORYTORNBLOM KY.1982; HUMAN RELATIONS (NEW YORK); ISSN 0018-7267; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 35; NO 11; PP. 991-1013; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

THE SALIENCE OF THE SELF IN RESPONSES TO INEQUITYREIS HT; BURNS LB.1982; JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0022-1031; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 18; NO 5; PP. 464-475; BIBL. 2 P.Article

THE JUSTICE MOTIVE: SOME HYPOTHESES AS TO ITS ORIGINS AND FORMS.LERNER MJ.1977; J. PERSONALITY; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 45; NO 1; PP. 1-52; BIBL. 2 P.Article

CHEATING, INTENTION, AND PUNISHMENT FROM AN EQUITY THEORY PERSPECTIVE.SAVITSKY JC; BABL J.1976; J. RES. PERSONALITY; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 10; NO 1; PP. 128-136; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

ON JUSTICE AS EQUALITY.SAMPSON EE.1975; J. SOC. ISSUES; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 31; NO 3; PP. 45-64; BIBL. 2 P. 1/2Article

Equity considerations in public risks evaluationFISHBURN, P. C; STRAFFIN, P. D.Operations research. 1989, Vol 37, Num 2, pp 229-239, issn 0030-364X, 11 p.Article

EQUITY AND SATISFACTION AMONG THE ELDERLYCARP FM; CARP A; MILLSAP R et al.1982; INT. J. AGING HUM. DEV.; ISSN 0091-4150; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 15; NO 2; PP. 151-166; BIBL. 33 REF.Article

EQUITY AND DEPRESSION AMONG MARRIED COUPLESSCHAFER RB; KEITH PM.1980; SOC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 43; NO 4; PP. 430-435; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

CATASTROPHE MODELING OF EQUITY IN ORGANIZATIONSGUASTELLO SJ.1981; BEHAV. SCI.; ISSN 0005-7940; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 26; NO 1; PP. 63-74; BIBL. 55 REF.Article

SECRET AMBITIONS AND PUBLIC PERFORMANCES. THE EFFECTS OF ANONYMITY ON REWARD ALLOCATIONS MADE BY MEN AND WOMEN.KIDDER LH; BELLETTIRIE G; COHN ES et al.1977; J. EXPER. SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 13; NO 1; PP. 70-80; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

THE MYTH OF EQUALITY IN SCIENCE CLASSROOMSBUTLER KAHLE J; LAKES MK.1983; JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING; ISSN 0022-4308; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 20; NO 2; PP. 131-140; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

EVALUATING EQUITY IN THE MARITAL RELATIONSHIP: AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACHSCHUMM WR; KIRN JE.1982; PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS; ISSN 0033-2941; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 51; NO 3; PART. 1; PP. 759-762; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

PERCEPTIONS OF THE EQUITY AND EXCHANGE PROCESSES IN DYADIC SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPSHOLT RW.1982; PERCEPT. MOT. SKILLS; ISSN 0031-5125; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 54; NO 1; PP. 303-320; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

EQUITY AND THE PERFORMANCE OF MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL PLAYERS: AN EXTENSION OF LORD AND HOHENFELDDUCHON D; JAGO AG.1981; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0021-9010; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 66; NO 6; PP. 728-732; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

STRATEGIES OF CHANGE LEADING TO EQUITY BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN WITH SPECIFIC IMPLICATIONS FOR THE MILITARY ORGANIZATIONSHALIT B.1978; HUM. RELAT.; GBR; DA. 1978; VOL. 31; NO 4; PP. 309-324; BIBL. 8 REF.Article