CORRELATION OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND NEPHROGRAPHY IN QUANTITATIVE COMPARISON OF UROGRAPHIC CONTRAST AGENTSWILSON BC; EVILL CA.1981; RADIOLOGY; ISSN 0033-8419; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 140; NO 1; PP. 127-134; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

METRIZAMIDE AS A NON-IONIC UROGRAPHIC AGENT. A COMPARISON WITH SODIUM IOTHALAMATE AND ITS DIMER = LE METRIZAMIDE COMME AGENT UROGRAPHIQUE NON IONIQUE. UNE COMPARAISON A L'IOTHALAMATE SODIQUE ET A SON DIMEREEVILL CA; BENNESS GT.1974; INVEST. RADIOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 9; NO 6; PP. 434-437; BIBL. 14REF.Article

SOLUTE EXCRETION DURING INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY: A COMPARISON OF SODIUM AND METHYLGLUCAMINE IOTHALAMATES. = EXCRETION DE SUBSTANCES DISSOUTES AU COURS DE L'UROGRAPHIE I.V.: COMPARAISON DES IOTHALAMATES DE NA ET DE METHYLGLUCAMINEEVILL CA; BENNESS GT.1975; INVEST. RADIOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 10; NO 2; PP. 148-153; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

COMPARISON OF IOPAMIDOL, IOXAGLATE, AND DIATRIZOATE DURING CORONARY ARTERIOGRAPHY IN DOGSTHOMSON KR; EVILL CA; FRITZSCHE J et al.1980; INVEST. RADIOL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 15; NO 3; PP. 234-241; BIBL. 18 REF.Article