IMPACT OF QUESTIONNAIRE LENGTH, FOLLOW-UP METHODS, AND GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION ON RESPONSE RATE TO A MAIL SURVEYSHETH JN; ROSCOE AM JR.1975; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 60; NO 2; PP. 252-254; BIBL. 8REFArticle

Personalization of mail surveys: too much of a good thing?RUCKER, M; HUGHES, R; THOMPSON, R et al.Educational and psychological measurement. 1984, Vol 44, Num 4, pp 893-905, issn 0013-1644Article

Effects of preliminary contacts on volunteering in mail surveys: another viewKERIN, R. A.Perceptual and motor skills. 1983, Vol 53, Num 3, issn 0031-5125, 1282Article

Career development in four professions: an empirical studyANDERSON, D. S; WESTERN, J. S; STACEY, B. G et al.Psychological reports. 1983, Vol 53, Num 3, pp 1263-1270, issn 0033-2941Article

Faculty response rates to a request for information for a study of salaryDAMBROT, F; ADDLEY-NEMETH, M; MARTIN, S et al.Psychological reports. 1984, Vol 54, Num 3, pp 883-886, issn 0033-2941Article

ON GENERALIZING ABOUT THE NEED FOR FOLLOW-UP EFFORTS IN MAIL RECREATION SURVEYSCHRISTENSEN JE.1982; J. LEIS. RES.; ISSN 0022-2216; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 14; NO 3; PP. 263-265; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

Response bias in mail surveys: further evidenceJOBBER, D.Psychological reports. 1984, Vol 54, Num 3, pp 891-894, issn 0033-2941Article

Effect of questionnaire layout and size and issue-involvement on response rates in mail surveysJANSEN, J. H.Perceptual and motor skills. 1985, Vol 61, Num 1, pp 139-142, issn 0031-5125Article

Class-of-mail and the effects of monetary gratuity on the response rates of mailed questionnairesHOPKINS, K. D; PODOLAK, J.The Journal of experimental education. 1983, Vol 51, Num 4, pp 169-170, issn 0022-0973Article

The use of mailed questionnaires to conduct survey researchKALMAN, T. P.Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis. 1988, Vol 16, Num 4, pp 513-524, issn 0090-3604Article

MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE RATE AND CORPORATE SIZECOTTON CC; WONDER BD.1982; PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS; ISSN 0033-2941; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 51; NO 3; PP. 1218; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

RESPONSE TO POSTAL QUESTIONNAIRE: THE EFFECTS OF ENQUIRY ABOUT EARNINGSSHEIKH K.1982; REV. INT. PSYCHOL. APPL.; ISSN 0035-340X; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 31; NO 3; PP. 345-349; ABS. FRE; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

THE EFFECT OF PERCEIVED CONSENSUS AND IMPLIED THREAT UPON RESPONSES TO MAIL SURVEYSBLASS T; LEICHTMAN SR; BROWN RA et al.1981; J. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-4545; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 113; NO 2; PP. 213-216; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

THE USE OF A DESCRIPTIVE COVER LETTER AND SECRETARY PRE-LETTER TO INCREASE RESPONSE RATE IN A MAILED SURVEYFURST LG; BLITCHINGTON WP.1979; PERSONNEL PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 32; NO 1; PP. 155-159; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

PERSONALIZATION, RESPONDENT ANONYMITY, AND RESPONSE DISTORTION IN MAIL SURVEYS.KERIN RA; PETERSON RA.1977; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 62; NO 1; PP. 86-89; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

EFFECT OF ETHNICITY OF SIGNATURE ON THE RATE OF RETURN AND CONTENT OF A MAIL QUESTIONNAIRE.FRIEDMAN HH; GOLDSTEIN L.1975; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 60; NO 6; PP. 770-771; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF SAMPLING, FOLLOW-UP LETTERS, AND COMMITMENT TO PARTICIPATION ON MAIL ATTITUDE SURVEY RESPONSEHINRICHS JR.1975; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 60; NO 2; PP. 249-251; BIBL. 6REFArticle

COMMENTS ON THE IMPORTANCE OF LATE RESPONDENT AND NON-RESPONDENT DATA FROM MAIL SURVEYSBROWN TL; DAWSON CP; HUSTIN DL et al.1981; J. LEIS. RES.; ISSN 0022-2216; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 13; NO 1; PP. 76-79; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

A RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON THE IMPORTANCE OF LATE RESPONDENT AND NON RESPONDENT DATA FROM MAIL SURVEYSWELLMAN JD; HAWK EG; ROGGENBUCK JW et al.1981; J. LEIS. RES.; ISSN 0022-2216; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 13; NO 1; PP. 80-82Article

VERZERRUNGEN BEI POSTALISCHEN BEFRAGUNGEN: DAS PROBLEM DER NICHTANTWORTER = DISTORSION DANS LES ENQUETES POSTALES: LE PROBLEME DE CELUI QUI NE REPOND PASBINDER J; SIEBER M; ANGST J et al.1979; Z. EXPER. ANGEW. PSYCHOL.; DEU; DA. 1979; VOL. 26; NO 1; PP. 53-71; ABS. ENG/FRE; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

IQ SCORE AND MAILED QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSEMACEK AJ; MILES GH.1975; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 60; NO 2; PP. 258-259; BIBL. 6REFArticle

EFFECTS OF PRAISE AND SMALL REQUESTS ON RECEPTIVITY TO DIRECT-MAIL APPEALSSWINYARD WR; RAY ML.1979; J. SOC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 108; NO 2; PP. 177-184; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF PRELIMINARY CONTACTS ON VOLUNTEERING IN MAIL SURVEYSNEDERHOF AJ.1982; PERCEPT. MOT. SKILLS; ISSN 0031-5125; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 54; NO 3; PART. 2; PP. 1333-1334; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

ERGEBNISSE EINER EMPIRISCHEN UNTERSUCHUNG ZUR REPRAESENTATIVITAET POSTALISCHER BEFRAGUNGEN = DONNEES D'UNE ETUDE EMPIRIQUE SUR LA REPRESENTATIVITE DES ENQUETES POSTALESEICHNER K; HABERMEHL W.1982; KOELN. Z. SOZIOL. SOZIALPSYCHOL.; ISSN 0023-2653; DEU; DA. 1982-03; VOL. 34; PP. 117-126; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

RESPONSE CHARACTERISTICS IN A MAIL SURVEYSTUMPF SA; HRACH BEDROSIAN.1980; PSYCHOL. REP.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 46; NO 3; PART. 1; PP. 863-869; BIBL. 13 REF.Article