THE EFFECTS OF ACTUAL BEHAVIOR VS. MERE LABELLING IN ATTRIBUTION OF SEX DIFFERENCESMURPHY BERMAN V; BERMAN JJ; SMITH C et al.1981; PSYCHOL. WOMEN Q.; ISSN 0361-6843; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 5; NO 5; PP. 728-736; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

GENDER AND SEX AS DETERMINANTS OF HIREABILITY OF APPLICANTS FOR GENDER-TYPED JOBSFRANCESCO AM; HAKEL MD.1981; PSYCHOL. WOMEN Q.; ISSN 0361-6843; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 5; NO 5; PP. 747-757; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

TOMBOYISM.HYDE JS; ROSENBERG BG; BEHRMAN JA et al.1977; PSYCHOL. WOMEN QUART.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 2; NO 1; PP. 73-75; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

PLAYROOM TOY PREFERENCES OF FIFTEEN MASCULINE AND FIFTEEN FEMININE BOYS = PREFERENCES CONCERNANT DES JOUETS PLACES DANS UNE SALLE DE JEU DE 15 GARCONS AYANT UN COMPORTEMENT FEMININ OU MASCULINGREEN R; FULLER M; RUTLEY BR et al.1972; BEHAV. THERAPY; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 3; NO 3; PP. 425-429; BIBL. 11REF.Article

EQUALITY AND GENITALITYKIRKPATRICK M.1982; AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOANALYSIS; ISSN 0002-9548; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 42; NO 2; PP. 99-107; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

GENDER, DESCRIPTIVE LANGUAGE AND SCIENTIFIC REPORTINGRICHARDSON JG; DAMRON E.1981; PERCEPT. MOT. SKILLS; ISSN 0031-5125; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 53; NO 2; PP. 483-489; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

ANOTHER LOOK AT SEX BIAS IN STUDENTS' EVALUATIONS OF PROFESSORS: DO WINNERS GET THE RECOGNITION THAT THEY HAVE BEEN GIVEN.KASCHAK E.1981; PSYCHOL. WOMEN Q.; ISSN 0361-6843; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 5; NO 5; PP. 767-772; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

FREUD AND THE WOMEN IN HIS WORLD.SPIEGEL R.1977; J. AMER. ACAD. PSYCHOANAL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 5; NO 3; PP. 377-402; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

ON THE UTILITY OF ALTERNATIVE PROCEDURES FOR ASSESSING PSYCHOLOGICAL ANDROGYNY.BEM SL.1977; J. CONSULTG CLIN. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 45; NO 2; PP. 196-205; BIBL. 29 REF.Article

MATCHING MUSIC WITH PAINTINGS BY KLEE = APPARIEMENT DE MUSIQUE ET DE PEINTURES DE K-LEEMINNIGERODE FA; CIANCIO DW; SBARBORO LA et al.1976; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 42; NO 1; PP. 269-270; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

ANDROGYNY AND OTHER MEASURES OF MASCULINITY-FEMINITY.WAKEFIELD JA JR; SASEK J; FRIEDMAN AF et al.1976; J. CONSULTG CLIN. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 44; NO 5; PP. 766-770; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

ATTITUDES TOWARD FEMINISM. FORTY YEARS LATER.DOYLE JA.1976; SEX ROLES; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 2; NO 4; PP. 399-400; BIBL. 1 REF.Article

MASCULINITY-FEMININITY IN CREATIVE COLLEGE WOMEN.SUTER B; DOMINO G.1975; J. PERSONALITY ASSESS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 39; NO 4; PP. 414-420; BIBL. 24 REF.Article

A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE ON ANDROGYNY: EVALUATION OF MASCULINE AND FEMININE PERSONALITY CHARACTERISTICSMAJOR B; CARNEVALE PJD; DEAUX K et al.1981; J. PERS. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-3514; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 41; NO 5; PP. 988-1001; BIBL. 2 P.Article

ANDROGYNY IN PSYCHOTHERAPY: BUT WILL IT SELL IN PEORIA.KENWORTHY JA.1979; PSYCHOL. WOMEN QUART.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 3; NO 3; PP. 231-240; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS AFFECTING CHANGE IN WOMEN'S ROLES AND STATUS: A CROSS-CULTURAL STUDYALMEIDA ACOSTA E; SANCHEZ DE ALMEIDA ME.1983; INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0020-7594; FRA; DA. 1983; VOL. 18; NO 1-2; PP. 3-35; ABS. FRE; BIBL. 2 P.Article

REMARKS ON SCORING ANDROGYNY AS A SINGLE CONTINUOUS VARIABLESTRAHAN RF.1981; PSYCHOL. REP.; ISSN 0033-2941; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 49; NO 3; PP. 887-890; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

REPRESENTATIONS MASCULINES DANS DIFFERENTES SITUATIONS DE RENCONTRES MIXTESDOISE W; WEINBERGER M.1972; BULL. PSYCHOL.; FR.; DA. 1972; VOL. 26; NO 10-11; PP. 649-657; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

THE FRANCK DRAWING COMPLETION TEST: A TOOL FOR RESEARCH IN SEX-ROLE IDENTIFICATIONHARKEY NJ.1982; J. PERS. ASSESS.; ISSN 0022-3891; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 46; NO 1; PP. 32-43; BIBL. 31 REF.Article

THE MULTIDIMENSIONAL ASPECTS OF MASCULINITY-FEMINITYBERNARD LC.1981; J. PERS. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-3514; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 41; NO 4; PP. 797-802; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

REAKTIONEN AUF EROTISCHE REIZE IN ABHAENGIGKEIT VOM BIOLOGISCHEN UND PSYCHOLOGISCHEN GESCHLECHT = REACTIONS AUX STIMULATIONS EROTIQUES PAR RAPPORT AU SEXE BIOLOGIQUE ET PSYCHOLOGIQUEKESSLER BH; SCHWICKERATH J.1981; PSYCHOL. BEITR.; ISSN 0033-3018; DEU; DA. 1981; VOL. 23; NO 3-4; PP. 421-433; ABS. ENG/FRE; BIBL. 2 P.Article

ROLE RELEVANT SEX TYPING AND OPPORTUNITY IN AGENTIC AND COMMUNAL DOMAINSHANSSON RO; O'CONNOR ME; JONES WH et al.1980; J. PERS.; ISSN 0022-3506; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 48; NO 4; PP. 419-434; BIBL. 2 P.Article

ANDROGYNY, SEX-TYPING, AND THE PERCEPTION OF MASCULINITY-FEMININITY IN HANDWRITINGS.LIPPA R.1977; J. RES. PERSONALITY; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 11; NO 1; PP. 21-37; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

PARENT BEHAVIORS RELATED TO MASCULINE, FEMININE, AND ANDROGYNOUS SEX ROLE ORIENTATIONS.KELLY JA; WORELL L.1976; J. CONSULTG CLIN. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 44; NO 5; PP. 843-851; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

SEX-ROLE PRESCRIPTIONS AND ATTITUDES OF PHYSICAL EDUCATORSHOFEREK MJ.1982; SEX ROLES; ISSN 0360-0025; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 8; NO 1; PP. 83-98; BIBL. 23 REF.Article