HOMOGENIZING THE 2 X 2 CONTINGENCY TABLE: A METHOD FOR REMOVING DEPENDENCIES DUE TO SUBJECT AND ITEM DIFFERENCESFLEXSER AJ.1981; PSYCHOL. REV.; ISSN 0033-295X; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 88; NO 4; PP. 327-339; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

AN INTERACTIVE, SELF-INSTRUCTING FORTRAN PROGRAM FOR ONE- AND TWO-WAY ANALYSES OF VARIANCEFLEXSER AJ.1982; BEHAV. RES. METHODS INSTRUM.; ISSN 0005-7878; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 14; NO 3; PP. 350; BIBL. 1 REF.Article

LONG-TERM RECOGNITION LATENCIES UNDER REHEARSAL-CONTROLLED CONDITIONS: DO LIST-LENGTH EFFECTS DEPEND ON ACTIVE MEMORY.FLEXSER AJ.1978; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., HUM. LEARNG MEM.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 4; NO 1; PP. 47-54; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

FURTHER EVIDENCE REGARDING INSTRUCTIONAL EFFECTS ON FREQUENCY JUDGMENTS.FLEXSER AJ; BOWER GH.1975; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 6; NO 3; PP. 321-324; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

HOW FREQUENCY AFFECTS RECENCY JUDGEMENTS. A MODEL FOR RECENCY DISCRIMINATIONFLEXSER AJ; BOWER GH.1974; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 103; NO 4; PP. 706-716; BIBL. 13REF.Article

RETRIEVAL INDEPENDENCE IN RECOGNITION AND RECALL.FLEXSER AJ; TULVING E.1978; PSYCHOL. REV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 85; NO 3; PP. 153-171; BIBL. 31 REF.Article