DENSITY OF REINFORCEMENT. I. EFFECT ON INSTRUMENTAL RESPONSE VIGOR = LA DENSITE DU RENFORCEMENT. I. EFFET SUR LA VIGUEUR DE LA REPONSE INSTRUMENTALESPELT PF; CROWLEY CE.1973; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 32; NO 2; PP. 383-390; BIBL. 11REF.Article

INTERACTION OF FREQUENCY AND MAGNITUDE OF REINFORCEMENT ON CONCURRENT PERFORMANCES = INTERACTION DE LA FREQUENCE ET DE L'INTENSITE DU RENFORCEMENT SUR DES PERFORMANCES CONCURRENTESTODOROV JC.1973; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 19; NO 3; PP. 451-458; BIBL. 14REF.Article

REINFORCEMENT AND RESPONSE RATE INTERACTION IN MULTIPLE RANDOM-INTERVAL AVOIDANCE SCHEDULES = INTERACTION DU RENFORCEMENT ET DE LA FREQUENCE DE REPONSES DANS DES PLANS MULTIPLES D'EVITEMENT A INTERVALLES FIXES AU HASARDDE VILLIERS PA.1972; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 18; NO 3; PP. 499-507; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

IMPLEMENTATION OF VARIABLE SCHEDULE, SELF-REINFORCEMENT PROCEDURES.DORSEL TN.1977; BEHAV. THERAPY; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 8; NO 3; PP. 489-491; BIBL. 1 REF.Article

FREQUENCY OF REINFORCEMENT AS A DETERMINANT OF EXTINCTION-INDUCED AGGRESSION DURING ERRORLESS DISCRIMINATION LEARNINGRILLING M; CAPLAN HJ.1975; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 23; NO 1; PP. 121-129; BIBL. 17REF.Article

SCHEDULE-INDUCED DRINKING AS A FUNCTION OF PERCENTAGE REINFORCEMENTALLEN JD; PORTER JH; ARAZIE R et al.1975; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 23; NO 2; PP. 223-232; BIBL. 20REF.Article

SIGNALLED AND UNSIGNALLED PERCENTAGE REINFORCEMENT OF PERFORMANCE UNDER A CHAINED SCHEDULE.BRANCH MN.1977; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 27; NO 1; PP. 71-83; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

EFFECTS OF INFORMATIONAL INPUT ON THE SOCIAL DEPRIVATION-SATIATION EFFECT = LES EFFETS DE L'APPORT D'INFORMATION SUR L'EFFET DE PRIVATION-SATIATION SOCIALBABAD EY.1973; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 27; NO 1; PP. 1-5; BIBL. 12REF.Article

MATCHING IN A NETWORK.HERRNSTEIN RJ; LOVELAND DH.1976; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 26; NO 2; PP. 143-153; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

BEHAVIOR OF HUMANS IN VARIABLE-INTERVAL SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT.BRADSHAW CM; SZABADI E; BEVAN P et al.1976; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 26; NO 2; PP. 135-141; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

INTRACTABLE PROPERTIES OF RESPONDING UNDER A FIXED-INTERVAL SCHEDULEGENTRY GD; MARR MJ.1982; J. EXP. ANAL. BEHAV.; ISSN 0022-5002; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 37; NO 2; PP. 233-241; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE CONTRAST EFFECTS AS A FUNCTION OF SHIFTS IN PERCENTAGE OF REWARDSEYBERT JA.1979; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 13; NO 1; PP. 19-22; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

EFFECT OF PUNISHMENT ON HUMAN VARIABLE-INTERVAL PERFORMANCE.BRADSHAW CM; SZABADI E; BEVAN P et al.1977; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 27; NO 2; PP. 275-279; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

PUNISHMENT OF OBSERVING BY A STIMULUS ASSOCIATED WITH THE LOWER OF TWO REINFORCEMENT FREQUENCIES.JWAIDEH AR; MULVANEY DE.1976; LEARNG AND MOTIVAT.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 7; NO 2; PP. 211-222; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

PERFORMANCE OF HUMANS IN VARIABLE-INTERVAL AVOIDANCE SCHEDULES PROGRAMMED SINGLY, AND CONCURRENTLY WITH VARIABLE-INTERVAL SCHEDULES OF POSITIVE REINFORCEMENTRUDDLE HV; BRADSHAW CM; SZABADI E et al.1981; Q. J. EXP. PSYCHOL., B, COMP. PHYSIOL. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0272-4995; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 33; NO 4; PP. 213-226; BIBL. 2 P.Article

THE EFFECT OF SIGNALED REINFORCEMENT AVAILABILITY ON CONCURRENT PERFORMANCES IN HUMANSBRADSHAW CM; SZABADI E; BEVAN P et al.1979; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 32; NO 1; PP. 65-74; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

SCHEDULE-INDUCED DRINKING AS A FUNCTION OF INTERREINFORCEMENT INTERVAL IN THE RHESUS MONKEY.ALLEN JD; KENSHALO DR JR.1976; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 26; NO 2; PP. 257-267; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

SENSORY SUPERSTITION ON MULTIPLE INTERVAL SCHEDULESSTARR BC; STADDON JER.1982; J. EXP. ANAL. BEHAV.; ISSN 0022-5002; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 37; NO 2; PP. 267-280; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

THE CONTRIBUTION OF AN ADDED COUNTER TO A FIXED-RATIO SCHEDULEFERSTER CB; PEELE DB.1980; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 34; NO 1; PP. 93-105; BIBL. 26 REF.Article

RESPONSE REQUIREMENTS AS CONSTRAINTS ON OUTPUTZEILER MD; BUCHMAN IB.1979; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 32; NO 1; PP. 29-49; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF DIFFERENTIAL PUNISHMENT OF TEMPORALLY SPACED RESPONDINGPISACRETA R; PAUL C.1982; PSYCHOL. REC.; ISSN 0033-2933; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 32; NO 2; PP. 269-279; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RESPONSE RATE AND REINFORCEMENT FREQUENCY IN VARIABLE-INTERVAL SCHEDULES. III: THE EFFECT OF D-AMPHETAMINEBRADSHAW CM; RUDDLE HV; SZABADI E et al.1981; J. EXP. ANAL. BEHAV.; ISSN 0022-5002; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 36; NO 1; PP. 29-39; BIBL. 30 REF.Article

EFFECT OF FREQUENCY AND PROBABILITY OF REWARD ON CHOICE.GREY DA.1978; PSYCHOL. REP.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 42; NO 2; PP. 543-549; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

SECOND-ORDER SCHEDULES OF TOKEN REINFORCEMENT: COMPARISONS OF PERFORMANCE UNDER FIXED-RATION AND VARIABLE-RATIO EXCHANGE SCHEDULESWEBBE FM; MALAGODI EF.1978; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 30; NO 2; PP. 219-224; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

MATCHING IN MULTIPLE SCHEDULES USING LONG COMPONENT DURATIONS.BRADSHAW CM; CZABADI E; BEVAN P et al.1977; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 41; NO 3 PART. 1; PP. 728-730; BIBL. 6 REF.Article