THE EFFECTS OF ITEM CALIBRATION SAMPLE SIZE AND ITEM POOL SIZE ON AN ADAPTIVE TESTINGREE MH.1981; APPL. PSYCHOL. MEAS.; ISSN 0146-6216; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 5; NO 1; PP. 11-19; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN VARIATE VALUES AND RANKS IN SMALL SIZE SAMPLESO'BRIEN RM.1982; BR. J. MATH. STAT. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0007-1102; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 35; NO 1; PP. 106-112; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

A MODEL FOR COMPUTING THE SIZE OF A THERAPY GROUPSWEET AL.1981; IEEE TRANS. SYST. MAN CYBERN.; ISSN 0018-9472; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 11; NO 2; PP. 160-167; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

POWER OF THE MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE TESTSSTEUENS JP.1980; PSYCHOL. BULL.; ISSN 0033-2909; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 88; NO 3; PP. 728-737; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

LARGE GROUP BARGAINING IN A CHARACTERISTIC FUNCTION GAMEMURNIGHAN JK; ROTH AE.1978; J. CONFLICT RESOLUT.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 22; NO 2; PP. 299-317; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

THE EXERCISE OF EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIPBLAKE RR; MOUTON JS.1981; JELS, J. EXP. LEARN. SIMUL.; ISSN 0162-6574; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 3; NO 1; PP. 3-16; BIBL. 32 REF.Article

SMALL SAMPLE PROFILE ANALYSIS WITH MANY VARIABLESMAXWELL SE; ARVEY RD.1982; PSYCHOL. BULL.; ISSN 0033-2909; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 92; NO 3; PP. 778-785; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

APPLICATION OF LEARNING THEORY TO SMALL GROUP INSTRUCTION: AN INNOVATIVE PROGRAM FOR TREATMENT OF CHILDREN WITH SCOLIOSISGOODMAN G; SATTERFIELD MJ; YASUMURA K et al.1982; INT. J. REHABIL. RES.; ISSN 0342-5282; DEU; DA. 1982; VOL. 5; NO 4; PP. 523-527; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

TEN YEARS OF RESEARCH ON GROUP SIZE AND HELPINGLATANE B; NIDA S.1981; PSYCHOL. BULL.; ISSN 0033-2909; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 89; NO 2; PP. 308-324; BIBL. 2 P.Article

TESTING THE NORMAL APPROXIMATION AND MINIMAL SAMPLE SIZE REQUIREMENTS OF WEIGHTED KAPPA WHEN THE NUMBER OF CATEGORIES IS LARGECICCHETTI DV.1981; APPL. PSYCHOL. MEAS.; ISSN 0146-6216; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 5; NO 1; PP. 101-104; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

ALL ALONE IN FRONT OF ALL THOSE PEOPLE: STAYE FRIGHT AS A FUNCTION OF NUMBER AND TYPE OF CO-PERFORMERS AND AUDIENCEJACKSON JM; LATANE B.1981; J. PERS. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-3514; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 40; NO 1; PP. 73-85; BIBL. 30 REF.Article

THE EMERGENCE OF ORGANIZATION SETS IN THREE ECUMENICAL DISASTER RECOVERY ORGANIZATIONS: AN EMPIRICAL AND THEORETICAL EXPLORATIONROSS GA.1980; HUM. RELAT.; GBR; DA. 1980; VOL. 33; NO 1; PP. 23-39; BIBL. 29 REF.Article

DECREASED HELPFULNESS WITH INCREASED GROUP SIZE THROUGH LESSENING THE EFFECTS OF THE NEEDY INDIVIDUAL'S DEPENDENCY.BERKOWITZ L.1978; J. PERSONALITY; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 46; NO 2; PP. 299-310; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

PERFORMANCE OF A COMPOSITE AS A FUNCTION OF THE NUMBER OF JUDGES.LIBBY R; BLASHFIELD RK.1978; ORGANIZ. BEHAV. HUM. PERFORM.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 21; NO 2; PP. 121-129; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

GROUP SIZE AND SOCIETAL CONFLICT.STAVIG GR; BARNETT LD.1977; HUM. RELAT.; G.B.; DA. 1977; VOL. 30; NO 8; PP. 761-765; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

GROUP SIZE AND POPULATION DENSITY IN THE PROBALITY OF JOINING OR LEAVING FREE-FORMING GROUPS.CALSYN R; BECKER LJ.1976; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 39; NO 1; PP. 199-202; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

LARGE-SCALE SOCIAL SURVEYS: PERSPECTIVES, PROBLEMS, AND PROSPECTSFIENBERG SE; TANUR JM.1983; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; ISSN 0005-7940; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 28; NO 2; PP. 135-153; BIBL. 3 P.Article

AUTHORITY IN SMALL GROUPS: A LABORATORY TEST OF A MACHIAVELLIAN OBSERVATIONSPILLANE R.1983; BRITISH (THE) JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0144-6665; GBR; DA. 1983; VOL. 22; NO 1; PP. 51-59; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

STRUCTURAL DIMENSIONS OF SOCIAL SUPPORT GROUPSPILISUK M; PARKS SH.1980; J. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-3980; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 106; NO 2; PP. 157-177; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

IMPLICATIONS OF DEVELOPMENTAL THEORIES FOR COUNSELING ADOLESCENTS IN GROUPSBALL JD; MECK DS.1979; ADOLESCENCE; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 14; NO 55; PP. 529-534; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

PERCEIVED LEADERSHIP RANKINGS OF MALES AND FEMALES IN SMALL TASK GROUPSTINDALL JH; BOYLER L; CLINE P et al.1978; J. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 100; NO 1; PP. 13-20; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

THE CREATIVE PRODUCTION OF THE GROUP: EFFETS OF SMALL GROUP STRUCTUREGLOVER JA; CHAMBERS T.1978; SMALL GROUP BEHAV.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 9; NO 3; PP. 387-392; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

MINORITY INFLUENCE: EFFECTS OF SIZE, CONVERSION, AND SEXARBUTHNOT J; WAYNER M.1982; J. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-3980; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 111; PP. 285-295; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

AFTER DIVISION, BEFORE DECISION: GROUP FACTION SIZE AND PREDELIBERATION THININGKERR NL; WATTS BL.1982; SOC. PSYCHOL. Q.; ISSN 0190-2725; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 45; NO 4; PP. 198-205; BIBL. 2 P.Article

RATING SCALES: MEASURES OF CENTRAL TENDENCY AND SAMPLE SIZESGRIGG AO.1981; TRRL SUPPL. REP.; ISSN 0305-1315; GBR; DA. 1981; NO 647; 13 P.; BIBL. 16 REF.Serial Issue