GENERALIZED PROXIMITY FUNCTION COMPARISONSHUBERT LJ.1978; BRIT. J. MATH. STATIST. PSYCHOL.; GBR; DA. 1978; VOL. 31; NO 2; PP. 179-192; BIBL. 28 REF.Article

ANALYZING PROXIMITY MATRICES: THE ASSESSMENT OF INTERNAL VARIATION IN COMBINATORIAL STRUCTUREHUBERT LJ.1980; J. MATH. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 21; NO 3; PP. 247-264; BIBL. 34 REF.Article

COMPARISON OF SEQUENCESHUBERT LJ.1979; PSYCHOL. BULL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 86; NO 5; PP. 1098-1106; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

MATCHING MODELS IN THE ANALYSIS OF CROSS-CLASSIFICATIONSHUBERT LJ.1979; PSYCHOMETRIKA; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 44; NO 1; PP. 21-41; BIBL. 42 REF.Article

CONFIRMATORY INFERENCE AND GEOMETRIC MODELSHUBERT LJ; SUBKOVIAK MJ.1979; PSYCHOL. BULL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 86; NO 2; PP. 361-370; BIBL. 27 REF.Article

THE COMPARISON AND FITTING OF GIVEN CLASSIFICATION SCHEMES.HUBERT LJ; BAKER FB.1977; J. MATH. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 16; NO 3; PP. 233-253; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

PHYSICAL FEATURES OF THE FRASER LAKE IGNEOUS COMPLEX, MANITOBA.HUBERT LJ; PARSLOW GR.1976; IN: GEOL. ASSOC. CANADA. ANNU. MEET. 29. MINERAL. ASSOC. CANADA. ANNU. MEET. 21; EDMONTON; 1976; TORONTO; GEOL. MINERAL. ASSOC.; DA. 1976; VOL. 1; PP. 73; RESUMEConference Paper

COMPARING RECTANGULAR DATA MATRICES = COMPARAISON DES MATRICES DE DONNEES RECTANGULAIRESHUBERT LJ; GOLLEDGE RG.1982; ENVIRON. PLANN. A; ISSN 0308-518X; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 14; NO 8; PP. 1087-1095; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

APPLICATION OF PREDICTION ANALYSIS TO DEVELOPMENT PRIORITYFROMAN T; HUBERT LJ.1980; PSYCHOL. BULL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 87; NO 1; PP. 136-146; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

INFERENCE MODELS FOR CATEGORICAL CLUSTERING.HUBERT LJ; LEVIN JR.1977; PSYCHOL. BULL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 84; NO 5; PP. 878-887; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

MEASURING THE POWER OF HIERARCHICAL CLUSTER ANALYSIS.BAKER FB; HUBERT LJ.1975; J. AMER. STATIST. ASS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 70; NO 349; PP. 31-38; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

A HEURISTIC METHOD FOR THE COMPARISON OF RELATED STRUCTURESHUBERT LJ; GOLLEDGE RG.1981; J. MATH. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-2496; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 23; NO 3; PP. 214-226; BIBL. 36 REF.Article

EVALUATING PRIORITY EFFECTS IN FREE RECALL.HUBERT LJ; LEVIN JR.1978; BRIT. J. MATH. STATIST. PSYCHOL.; G.B.; DA. 1978; VOL. 31; NO 1; PP. 11-18; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

A NOTE ON ANALYSING THE MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD MATRIX: AN APPLICATION OF A GENERALIZED PROXIMITY FUNCTION COMPARISONHUBERT LJ; BAKER FB.1979; BRIT. J. MATH. STATIST. PSYCHOL.; GBR; DA. 1979; VOL. 32; NO 2; PP. 179-184; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

APPLICATIONS OF COMBINATORIAL PROGRAMMING TO DATA ANALYSIS: THE TRAVELING SALESMAN AND RELATED PROBLEMS.HUBERT LJ; BAKER FB.1978; PSYCHOMETRIKA; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 43; NO 1; PP. 81-91; BIBL. 2 P. 1/2Article

APPLICATIONS OF COMBINATORIAL PROGRAMMING TO DATA ANALYSIS: SERIATION USING ASYMMETRIC PROXIMITY MEASURES.BAKER FB; HUBERT LJ.1977; BRIT. J. MATH. STATIST. PSYCHOL.; G.B.; DA. 1977; VOL. 30; NO 2; PP. 154-164; BIBL. 29 REF.Article

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE PROCEDURES BASED ON A PROXIMITY MEASURE BETWEEN SUBJECTSHUBERT LJ; GOLLEDGE RG; COSTANZO CM et al.1982; PSYCHOL. BULL.; ISSN 0033-2909; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 91; NO 2; PP. 424-430; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

UNIDIMENSIONAL SERIATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR EVALUATING CRIMINAL JUSTICE DATAHUBERT LJ; KENNY T; GOLLEDGE RG et al.1981; ENVIRON. PLANN. A; ISSN 0308-518X; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 13; NO 3; PP. 309-320; BIBL. 20 REF.Article