INADEQUATE DATA IN, ATTRACTIVE THEORY OUTHUMPHREYS LG.1982; J. EDUC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-0663; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 74; NO 3; PP. 424-426; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

THE STATISTICS OF FAILURE TO REPLICATE: A COMMENT ON BURIEL'S (1978) CONCLUSIONSHUMPHREYS LG.1980; J. EDUC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 72; NO 1; PP. 71-75; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CORRELATIONS IN A SINGLE SAMPLE: A CORRECTION AND AMPLIFICATIONHUMPHREYS LG.1978; PSYCHOL. REP.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 43; NO 2; PP. 657-658; BIBL. 1 REF.Article

STRATEGY TRAINING HAS NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON RACE DIFFERENCES IN NONVERBAL REASONING.HUMPHREYS LG.1976; J. EDUC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 68; NO 2; PP. 128-129; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

STATISTICAL SUBSTITUTES FOR EXPERIMENTAL CONTROLHUMPHREYS LG.1974; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 35; NO 1; PP. 336-338; BIBL. 3REF.Article

DOING RESEARCH THE HARD WAY: SUBSTITUTING ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE FOR A PROBLEM IN CORRELATIONAL ANALYSISHUMPHREYS LG.1978; J. EDUC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 70; NO 6; PP. 873-876; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

PREDICTABILITY OF EMPLOYEE THEFT: IMPORTANCE OF THE BASE RATE.HUMPHREYS LG.1977; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 62; NO 4; PP. 514-516; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

TO UNDERSTAND REGRESSION FROM PARENT TO OFFSPRING, THINK STATISTICALLYHUMPHREYS LG.1978; PSYCHOL. BULL.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 85; NO 6; PP. 1317-1322; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

ANALYSIS OF DATA FROM PRE- AND POSTTEST DESIGNS: A COMMENT.HUMPHREYS LG.1976; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 38; NO 2; PP. 639-642; BIBL. 1 REF.Article

PSEUDO-ORTHOGONAL AND OTHER ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE DESIGNS INVOLVING INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES VARIABLES = ANALYSE PSEUDO-ORTHOGONALE ET AUTRE DES MODELES DE VARIANCE IMPLIQUANT DES VARIABLES LIEES AUX DIFFERENCES INDIVIDUELLESHUMPHREYS LG; FLEISHMAN A.1974; J. EDUC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 66; NO 4; PP. 464-472; BIBL. 11REF.Article

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCES AND COVARIANCES IS MISLEADING AS A GUIDE TO A COMMON FACTOR MODELHUMPHREYS LG; PARK RK.1981; INTELLIGENCE (NORWOOD); ISSN 0160-2896; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 5; NO 2; PP. 157-163; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

A SIMPLEX PROCESS MODEL FOR DESCRIBING DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CROSS-LAGGED CORRELATIONSHUMPHREYS LG; PARSONS CK.1979; PSYCHOL. BULL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 86; NO 2; PP. 325-334; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

PARTIALING OUT INTELLIGENCE: A METHODOLOGICAL AND SUBSTANTIVE CONTRIBUTION.HUMPHREYS LG; PARSONS CK.1977; J. EDUC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 69; NO 3; PP. 212-216; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

CAUSES OF RACIAL AND SOCIOECONOMIC DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE TESTS.HUMPHREYS LG; FLEISHMAN AI; PANG CHIEH LIN et al.1977; J. RES. PERSONALITY; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 11; NO 2; PP. 191-208; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

THE SEX BY RACE INTERACTION IN COGNITIVE MEASURES.HUMPHREYS LG; PANG CHIEH LIN; FLEISHMAN A et al.1976; J. RES. PERSONALITY; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 10; NO 1; PP. 42-58; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

EDUCATIONAL USES OF TESTS WITH DISADVANTAGED STUDENTSCLEARY TA; HUMPHREYS LG; KENDRICK SA et al.1975; AMER. PSYCHOLOGIST; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 30; NO 1; PP. 15-41; BIBL. 34REF.Article