ABBREVIATED FORMS OF THE STANFORD-BINET, L-M: RELIABILITY AND EFFECT ON CLASSIFICATION OF INSTITUTIONALIZED MENTALLY RETARDED ADULTSPANEK PE; HAACK R.1979; PSYCHOL. REP.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 45; NO 2; PP. 676-678; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

CONSEQUENCES OF USING THE 1972 STANFORD-BINET INTELLIGENCE SCALE NORMS.THOMPSON RJ JR.1977; PSYCHOL. IN THE SCH.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 14; NO 4; PP. 444-448; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

ADMINISTRATION OF DIGIT SPAN ON THE WECHSLER AND BINET: DIFFERENCES THAT MATTER.HAGEN RL; DWRHAM T; SHANNON D et al.1977; J. CLIN. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 33; NO 2; PP. 480-482; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

PERFORMANCE OF DOWN SYNDROME INDIVIDUALS ON THE STANFORD-BINET INTELLIGENCE SCALESILVERSTEIN AB; LEGUTKI G; FRIEDMAN SL et al.1982; AM. J. MENT. DEFIC.; ISSN 0002-9351; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 86; NO 5; PP. 548-551; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

A COMPARISON OF OBTAINED AND ADJUSTED MENTAL AGE SCORES ON THE STANFORD-BINETCHRISTIAN BT; SUTTON GW.1981; PSYCHOL. SCH.; ISSN 0033-3085; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 18; NO 4; PP. 420-421; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

METHODES PSYCHOTECHNIQUES D'EVALUATION D'UNE DEFICIENCE INTELLECTUELLE DE L'ENFANT. EVALUER QUOI. COMMENT.DAILY R.1978; MED. INFANT.; FR.; DA. 1978; VOL. 85; NO 3; PP. 301-308 (6P.); BIBL. 17 REF.Article

BINET ITEM DIFFICULTY THEN AND NOW.GARFKINKEL R; THORNDIKE RL.1976; CHILD DEVELOP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 47; NO 4; PP. 959-965; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

VALIDITY OF THE TERMAN-MERRILL ABBREVIATED VERSION OF THE STANFORD-BINET, FORM L-MDODGE R; PALMER T; YATER AC et al.1981; PSYCHOL. SCH.; ISSN 0033-3085; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 18; NO 3; PP. 293-296; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

PREDICTIVE VALIDITY OF THE REVISED STANFORD BINET INTELLIGENCE SCALE WITH TRAINABLE MENTALLY RETARDED STUDENTSTHIEL GW; REYNOLDS CR.1980; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEASUR.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 40; NO 2; PP. 509-512; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

THE ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED CHILDREN WITH THE WISC-R, BINET AND OTHER TESTS.RASKIN LM; BLOOM AS; KLEE SH et al.1978; J. CLIN. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 34; NO 1; PP. 111-114; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

INVESTIGATION OF THE WISC-R FOR USE WITH RETARDED CHILDREN: CORRELATION WITH THE 1972 STANFORD-BINET AND COMPARISON OF WISC AND WISC-R PROFILES.KAUFMAN AS; VAN HAGEN J.1977; PSYCHOL. IN THE SCH.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 14; NO 1; PP. 10-14; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

AN UNFOUNDED CONCLUSION IN M.W. SMITH'S ANALYSIS OF CULTURE BIAS IN THE STANFORD-BINET INTELLIGENCE SCALE.JENSEN AR.1977; J. GENET. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 130; NO 1; PP. 113-115; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

A VALIDATION OF THE LEITER INTERNATIONAL PERFORMANCE SCALE WITH KINDERGARTEN CHILDRENREEVE RR; FRENCH JL; HUNTER M et al.1983; JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0022-006X; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 51; NO 3; PP. 458-459; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

COMPARISON OF SCORES OF NORMAL CHILDREN ON THE W1SC-R AND STANFORD-BINET, FORM LM, 1972.SEWELL T; MANNI J.1977; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 45; NO 3 PART. 2; PP. 1057-1058; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF EXAMINER'S PRIOR KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECTS' ETHNICITY AND INTELLIGENCE ON THE SCORING OF RESPONSES TO THE STANFORD-BINET SCALEMISHRA SP.1983; PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS; ISSN 0033-3085; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 20; NO 2; PP. 133-136; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

REPLY TO A.R. JENSEN'S COMMENTS ON M.W. SMITH'S ANALYSIS OF CULTURE BIAS IN THE STANFORD-BINET INTELLIGENCE SCALE.SMITH MW.1977; J. GENET. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 130; NO 1; PP. 117-120; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

THE PROLONGED AVOIDANCE OF INTELLECTUAL BEHAVIORPOPPLESTONE JA; MCPHERSON MW.1974; PSYCHOL. REC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 24; NO 2; PP. 549-557; BIBL. 1P.Article

SCORING AGREEMENT ON THE STANFORD-BINET = L'ACCEPTATION DE LA NOTATION AU STANFORD-BINETSATTLER JM; RYAN JJ.1973; J. CLIN. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 29; NO 1; PP. 35-38; BIBL. 5REF.Article

1972 REVISION OF THE STANFORD-BINET: A FAREWELL TO THE MENTAL AGE.SALVIA J; YSSELDYKE JE; LEE M et al.1975; PSYCHOL. IN THE SCH.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 12; NO 4; PP. 421-422; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

Cognitive profiles associated with the fra(X) syndrome in males and femalesFREUND, L. S; REISS, A. L.American journal of medical genetics. 1991, Vol 38, Num 4, pp 542-547, issn 0148-7299Article

COMPARISON OF THE 1960 AND 1972 REVISIONS OF THE STANFORD BINET LM.HOLROYD RG; BICKLEY J.1976; J. YOUTH ADOLESC.; G.B.; DA. 1976; VOL. 5; NO 1; PP. 101-104; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

EXTRAPOLATED STANFORD-BINET IQS FOR MENTALLY RETARDED AND MENTALLY GIFTED INDIVIDUALSSILVERSTEIN AB.1980; PSYCHOL. REP.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 46; NO 3; PART. 1; PP. 900-902; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

RELATION BETWEEN ITPA AVERAGE DEVIATION AND STANFORD-BINET INTELLIGENCE SCORES.BURNS E.1976; PSYCHOL. IN THE SCH.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 13; NO 3; PP. 285-287; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

A COMPARISON OF THE STANFORD-BINET INTELLIGENCE SCALE AND THE MCCARTHY SCALES OF CHILDREN'S ABILITIES WITH PRESCHOOL CHILDRENGERKEN KC; HANCOCK KA; WADE TH et al.1978; PSYCHOL. IN THE SCH.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 15; NO 4; PP. 468-472; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

THE EFFECT OF APPEARANCE ON SELF-PERCEPTIONSKELLERMAN JM; LAIRD JD.1982; J. PERS.; ISSN 0022-3506; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 50; NO 3; PP. 296-315; BIBL. 2 P.Article