Modification of the triangle-taste-test model to allow for nonforced guessingCASH, W. S.Biometrics. 1983, Vol 39, Num 1, pp 251-255, issn 0006-341XArticle

EFFECTS OF INTERPRETER CREDIBILITY AND DISCREPANCY LEVEL OF RESULTS ON RESPONSES TO TEST RESULTS = EFFETS DE LA CREDIBILITE DE CELUI QUI INTERPRETE ET DU NIVEAU DE CONTRADICTION QUANT AUX RESULTATS SUR LES REPONSES AUX RESULTATS PSYCHOMETRIQUESBINDERMAN RM; FRETZ BR; SCOTT NA et al.1972; J. COUNSELG PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 19; NO 5; PP. 399-403; BIBL. 6REF.Article

FATTORI STRUTTURALI E FATTORI CARATTEROLOGICI NELLE INTERPRETAZIONI DI MOVIMENTO DI CONFIGURAZIONI STATICHE = FACTEURS STRUCTURAUX ET FACTEURS CARACTERIOLOGIQUES DANS LES INTERPRETATIONS DE MOUVEMENTS DE CONFIGURATIONS STATIQUESSEDMAK D.1972; RIV. PSICOL.; ITAL.; DA. 1972; VOL. 66; NO 3-4; PP. 143-151; BIBL. 3REF.Article

Choice and Interpretation of Statistical Tests Used When Competing Risks Are PresentDIGNAM, James J; KOCHERGINSKY, Maria N.Journal of clinical oncology. 2008, Vol 26, Num 24, pp 4027-4034, issn 0732-183X, 8 p.Article

L'hémogramme = Blood countTRACHLI, A; MADANI, A; ZAFAD, S et al.Espérance médicale. 2000, Vol 7, Num 59, pp 123-127Article

Interpretation of nonstress testsHAGE, M. L.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1985, Vol 153, Num 5, pp 490-495, issn 0002-9378Article

RATING THE RATINGS: ASSESSING THE PSYCHOMETRIC QUALITY OF RATING DATASAAL FE; DOWNEY RG; LAHEY MA et al.1980; PSYCHOL. BULL.; ISSN 0033-2909; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 88; NO 2; PP. 413-428; BIBL. 2 P.Article

ACCURACY OF TEST-SCORE-DIFFERENCE DECISIONS AND THE JAGGED-PROFILE EFFECTCLAWAR HJ; HOPKINS TF.1975; J. EXPER. EDUC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 43; NO 3; PP. 40-45; BIBL. 4REFArticle

DEVELOPMENT OF AN EMPIRICAL INTERPRETIVE SYSTEM FOR THE MMPI: SOME AFTER-THE-FACT OBSERVATIONS = ELABORATION D'UN SYSTEME D'INTERPRETATION EMPIRIQUE DU MMPI: OBSERVATIONS EMPIRIQUESGYNTHER MD; ALTMAN H; SLETTEN IW et al.1973; J. CLIN. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 29; NO 2; PP. 232-234; BIBL. 9REF.Article

LE LANGAGE DE L'ABSTENTIONPASSERON JC.1982; CONSOMMATION; ISSN 0010-6593; FRA; DA. 1982; VOL. 29; NO 4; PP. 3-11Article

UNA NUOVA FORMULA PER STIMARE IL COEFFICIENTE DI FEDELTA' DI UN TEST, E VALORE TEORICO DEL COEFFICIENTE DI FEDELTA' = NOUVELLE FORMULE POUR ESTIMER LE COEFFICIENT DE FIDELITE D'UN TEST, ET VALEUR THEORIQUE DU COEFFICIENT DE FIDELITETROTTA A.1981; BOLLETTINO DI PSICOLOGIA APPLICATA; ISSN 0006-6761; ITA; DA. 1981; NO 159-160; PP. 203-222; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

NOTE ON INTERPRETING PROFILES OF MCCARTHY SCALE INDEXES.KAUFMAN AS.1975; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 41; NO 1; PP. 262; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

LES REACTIONS CUTANEES TUBERCULINIQUES TECHNIQUES ET INTERPRETATIONHERMANT A; MEDELLI J; MUIR JF et al.1982; REVUE MEDICALE DE PICARDIE; ISSN 0301-116X; FRA; DA. 1982; VOL. 10; NO 7; PP. 278-280; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

CHANGE AND ERROR OF MEASUREMENTLUND T.1981; SCAND. J. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0036-5564; SWE; DA. 1981; VOL. 22; NO 1; PP. 47-49; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

SOME DISTURBING CHARACTERISTICS OF THE LPC SCORE = QUELQUES CARACTERISTIQUES PERTURBATRICES DU SCORE AU LEAST PREFERRED COWORKERSTINSON JE; TRACY L.1974; PERSONNEL PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 27; NO 3; PP. 477-485; BIBL. 8REF.Article

THEORIE DU DISCERNEMENT DES IMAGES ET LA REVOLUTION DE PROBLEME DE CLASSIFICATION EN CLINIQUE A L'AIDE DES METHODES MEDICO-PSYCHOLOGIQUESTONKONOGIJ IM; IOVLEV BV.1976; ZH. NEVROPATOL. PSIKHIATR. S.S. KORSAKOVA; S.S.S.R.; DA. 1976; VOL. 76; NO 12; PP. 1821-1825; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

LENGTH OF PERSONALITY INVENTORY AND THE EVALUATION OF A GENERALIZED PERSONALITY INTERPRETATION = LA LONGUEUR DU TEST DE LA PERSONNALITE ET L'EVALUATION D'UNE INTERPRETATION GENERALISEE DE LA PERSONNALITEMERRENS MR; RICHARDS WS.1973; J. PERSONALITY ASSESS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 37; NO 1; PP. 83-85; BIBL. 9REF.Article

A FORTRAN COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR Q SORTS CALCULATIONS.DUNLAP WR.1978; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEASUR.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 38; NO 1; PP. 195-196; BIBL. 1 REF.Article

COMPARISON OF TWO OBJECTIVE SCORING SYSTEMS FOR THE TAT = COMPARAISON DE 2 SYSTEMES DE NOTATION OBJECTIFS POUR LE TATFOGELGREN LA.1974; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 39; NO 1PART1; PP. 255-260; BIBL. 9REF.Article

THE USE OF CHANGE CORRECTED PERCENTAGE OF AGREEMENT TO INTERPRET THE RESULTS OF A DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS.WIEDEMANN CF; FENSTER CA.1978; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEASUR.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 38; NO 1; PP. 29-35; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

Propagation of Uncertainty in Bayesian Diagnostic Test InterpretationSRINIVASAN, Preethi; BRANDON WESTOVER, M; BIANCHI, Matt T et al.Southern medical journal (Birmingham, Ala. Print). 2012, Vol 105, Num 9, pp 452-459, issn 0038-4348, 8 p.Article

Les tests statistiques : Intérêt, principe et interprétations = Statistical tests: Value, principle, and interpretationMICHEL, R; OLLIVIER-GAY, L; SPIEGEL, A et al.Médecine tropicale. 2002, Vol 62, Num 5, pp 561-563, issn 0025-682X, 3 p.Article

Au coeur de l'incohérence, les alcooliques au Rorschach = In the heart of incohernece, alcoholics and the RorschachZARKA, Josette; MONJAUZE, Michèle.Bulletin de psychologie. 2002, Vol 55, Num 458, pp 177-184, issn 0007-4403Article

Come interpretare una differenza di risposta tra gruppo trattato e gruppo controllo = How to interpret a difference in results between the treated group and controlMARUBINI, E.Rivista italiana di nutrizione parenterale ed enterale. 1992, Vol 10, Num 2, pp 150-151, issn 0393-5582Article

An argument-based approach to validityKANE, M. T.Psychological bulletin. 1992, Vol 112, Num 3, pp 527-535, issn 0033-2909Article