THE ATTRIBUTION CUBE AND MORAL EVALUATIONSFORSYTH DR; POPE WR.1983; BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY; ISSN 0090-5054; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 21; NO 2; PP. 117-118; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

COGNITIVE REFERENCE POINTS IN JUDGMENTS OF SYMBOLIC MAGNITUDEHOLYOAK KJ; MAH WA.1982; COGNIT. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0010-0285; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 14; NO 3; PP. 328-352; BIBL. 3 P.Article

A CURRICULUM TO IMPROVE THINKING UNDER UNCERTAINTYBEYTH MAROM R; DEKEL S.1983; INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE; ISSN 0020-4277; NLD; DA. 1983; VOL. 12; NO 1; PP. 67-82; BIBL. 3 P.Article

EQUITY JUDGMENT: A REVISION OF ARISTOTELIAN VIEWSMELLERS BA.1982; J. EXP. PSYCHOL., GEN.; ISSN 0096-3445; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 111; NO 2; PP. 242-270; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

THE CORROBORATION TIME MEASURE: AN IMPLICIT CONFIDENCE JUDGEMENTNICOLSON R.1982; ACTA PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0001-6918; NLD; DA. 1982; VOL. 51; NO 1; PP. 27-39; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

VARIATION DE LA SENSIBILITE A L'INFLUENCE SOCIALE, SELON LES RAPPORTS DU SUJET A L'OBJET DE JUGEMENTGAFFIE B.1979; BULL. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0007-4403; FRA; DA. 1979-1980; VOL. 33; NO 346; PP. 840-849; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

IS THREE COMPASSION IN PRINCIPLED MORAL JUDGMENT.SIMMONS DD.1982; PSYCHOL. REP.; ISSN 0033-2941; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 50; NO 2; PP. 553-554; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

PSYCHOLOGICAL ISSUES RAISED IN THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT CASE PEOPLE VS. COLLINSKAPLAN RM; ATKINS CJ.1982; PSYCHOL. REP.; ISSN 0033-2941; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 50; NO 1; PP. 259-266; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

APPROCHE EXPERIMENTALE DU JUGEMENT: LE CAS DE L'EXPERT-CONSEILLER D'ORIENTATIONMULLET E.1982; ORIENTAT. SC. PROF.; ISSN 0249-6739; FRA; DA. 1982; VOL. 11; NO 2; PP. 157-167; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

EFFET DU JUGEMENT DE L'EXPERIMENTATEUR SUR LA SIGNIFICATION DE L'EXPERIENCE POUR UN SUJETALAPHILIPPE D.1980; BULL. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0007-4403; FRA; DA. 1980-1981; VOL. 34; NO 352; PP. 941-946; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

INFLUENCE OF INFERENTIAL SET, OUTCOME INTENT, AND OUTCOME SEVERITY ON CHILDREN'S MORAL JUDGMENTSFERGUSON TJ; RULE BG.1982; DEV. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0012-1649; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 18; NO 6; PP. 843-851; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

JUDGING SIMILARITY AMONG STRINGS DESCRIBED BY HIERARCHICAL TREESLOPES LL; JOHNSON MD.1982; ACTA PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0001-6918; NLD; DA. 1982; VOL. 51; NO 1; PP. 13-26; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

MEASURING THE IMPORTANCE OF CUES IN POLICY CAPTURINGLANE DM; MURPHY KR; MARQUES TE et al.1982; ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE; ISSN 0030-5073; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 30; NO 2; PP. 231-240; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

A TEST OF TASK INFLUENCES IN UNCERTAINTY MEASUREMENTHOWELL WC; KERKAR SP.1982; ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE; ISSN 0030-5073; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 30; NO 3; PP. 365-390; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH A SUCCESSFUL INSANITY PLEASTEADMAN HJ; KEITNER L; BRAFF J et al.1983; AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY; ISSN 0002-953X; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 140; NO 4; PP. 401-405; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

ATTRIBUTIONS OF RESPONSIBILITY BY SIMULATED JURORS: STAGE OF MORAL REASONING AND GUILT BY ASSOCIATIONARBUTHNOT J.1983; PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS; ISSN 0033-2941; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 52; NO 1; PP. 287-298; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF SALIENCE AND TIME PRESSURE ON RATINGS OF SOCIAL CAUSALITYSTRACK F; ERBER R; WICKLUND RA et al.1982; JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0022-1031; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 18; NO 6; PP. 581-594; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

RULES IN CHILDREN'S MORAL JUDGMENTS: INTEGRATION OF INTENT, DAMAGE, AND RATIONALE INFORMATIONLEON M.1982; DEV. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0012-1649; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 18; NO 6; PP. 835-842; BIBL. 28 REF.Article

REGRESSION ET AIDE AU JUGEMENTMULLET E.1982; REVUE DE PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE; ISSN 0035-1709; FRA; DA. 1982; VOL. 32; NO 4; PP. 227-246; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 2 P.Article

CALIBRATION OF AUDITORS' PROBABILISTIC JUDGMENTS: SOME EMPIRICAL EVIDENCETOMASSINI LA; SOLOMON I; ROMNEY MB et al.1982; ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE; ISSN 0030-5073; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 30; NO 3; PP. 391-406; BIBL. 2 P.Article

THE MAITLAND GRAVES DESIGN JUDGMENT TEST JUDGED BY 22 EXPERTSGOETZ KO; GOETZ K.1974; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 39; NO 1PART1; PP. 261-262; BIBL. 6REF.Article

CHILDREN'S DIFFERENTIATIONS AMONG POTENTIAL RECEPIENTS OF AIDEISENBERG N.1983; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; ISSN 0009-3920; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 54; NO 3; PP. 594-602; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

MORAL JUDGMENT AS A FUNCTION OF PEER GROUP INTERACTION = LE JUGEMENT MORAL COMME FONCTION DE L'INTERACTION DU GROUPE DE PAIRSMAITLAND KA; GOLDMAN JR.1974; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 30; NO 5; PP. 699-704; BIBL. 13REF.Article

SOCIAL JUDGMENT THEORY AND ACADEMIC ADVISEMENTJOHNSON WR; DOHERTY ME.1983; JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0022-0167; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 30; NO 2; PP. 271-274; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

INTERNORTH WINS SUIT AGAINST DOE1982; OIL GAS J.; ISSN 0030-1388; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 80; NO 40; PP. 35Article