QUALIFICATIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS OF IMAGES OF CONCEALED OBJECTS: A REPLY TO KERR AND NEISSERKEENAN JM.1983; JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY. LEARNING, MEMORY, AND COGNITION; ISSN 0278-7393; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 9; NO 2; PP. 222-230; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

MEMORY FOR IMAGES OF CONCEALED OBJECTS: A REEXAMINATION OF NEISSER AND KERRKEENAN JM; MOORE RE.1979; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., HUM. LEARNG MEM.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 5; NO 4; PP. 374-385; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

PRAGMATICS IN MEMORY: A STUDY OF NATURAL CONVERSATION.KEENAN JM; MACWHINNEY B; MAYHEW D et al.1977; J. VERB. LEARNG VERB. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 16; NO 5; PP. 549-560; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

THE ROLE OF AROUSAL IN MEMORY FOR CONVERSATIONMACWHINNEY B; KEENAN JM; REINKE P et al.1982; MEM. COGNIT.; ISSN 0090-502X; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 10; NO 4; PP. 308-317; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

COMPREHENSION AND RECALL OF TEXT AS A FUNCTION OF CONTENT VARIABLESKINTSCH W; KOZMINSKY E; STREBY WJ et al.1975; J. VERB. LEARNG. VERB. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 14; NO 2; PP. 196-214; BIBL. 19REFArticle