ACCURACY OF THE POLYGRAPH TECHNIQUE WITH AND WITHOUT CARD TEST STIMULATION.SENESE L.1976; J. POLICE SCI. ADMINISTR.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 4; NO 3; PP. 274-276; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

EXTRAVERSION AND THE DETECTION OF DECEPTION: COMMENTS ON THE PAPER BY BRADLEY AND JANISSEGUDJONSSON GH.1982; PERS. INDIVID. DIFFER.; ISSN 0191-8869; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 3; NO 2; PP. 215-216; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

HUMANS AS LIE DETECTORS: SOME SECOND THOUGHTSKRAUT R; DEPAULO BM; ZUCKERMAN M et al.1980; J. COMMUN.; ISSN 0021-9916; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 30; NO 4; PP. 209-218; BIBL. DISSEM.Article

PROBLEMES CHOISIS DES ETUDES EXPERIMENTALES SUR LA "DETECTION DU MENSONGE"WIDACKI J; MOTYKA M; ZELECHOWSKA RZEPKA U et al.1977; PRZEGL. PSYCHOL.; POLSKA; DA. 1977; VOL. 20; NO 3; PP. 483-489; ABS. ANGL. RUSSE; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

STATISTICAL VERSUS CLINICAL LIE DETECTIONSZUCKO JJ; KLEINMUNTZ B.1981; AM. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0003-066X; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 36; NO 5; PP. 488-496; BIBL. 41 REF.Article

THE PSYCHOPATH AND THE LIE DETECTOR.LYKKEN DT.1978; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 15; NO 2; PP. 137-142; BIBL. 24 REF.Article

CHARACTERISTICS OF HIGH LIE SCORERS.KIRTON M.1977; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 40; NO 1; PP. 279-280; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

THE EFFECT OF SELECTED VARIABLES ON INTERPRETATION OF POLYGRAPH RECORDS.HORVATH F.1977; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 62; NO 2; PP. 127-136; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

A METHOD FOR EVALUATING THE USE OF THE POLYGRAPH IN A REAL-LIFE SITUATIONGINTON A; DAIE N; ELAAD E et al.1982; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0021-9010; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 67; NO 2; PP. 131-137; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

VERBAL AND NONVERBAL CUES IN THE PERCEPTION OF LYING.KRAUT RE.1978; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 36; NO 4; PP. 380-391; BIBL. 1 P.Article

DECISION THEORY APPROACH TO THE PROBLEM OF POLYGRAPH INTERROGATION.LIEBLICH I; BEN SKAKHAR G; KUGELMASS S et al.1978; J. APPL. PHYSIOL.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 63; NO 4; PP. 489-498; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF LEVEL OF SOCIALIZATION ON ELECTRODERMAL DETECTION OF DECEPTIONWAID WM; ORNE MT; WILSON SK et al.1979; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 16; NO 1; PP. 15-22; BIBL. 27 REF.Article

THE USE AND MISUSE OF HYPNOSIS IN COURTORNE MT.1979; INTERNATION. J. CLIN. EXPER. HYPNOS.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 27; NO 4; PP. 311-341; ABS. GER/FRE/SPA; BIBL. 2 P.Article

THE EFFICACY OF THE PSYCHOLOGICAL STRESS EVALUATOR IN DETECTING DECEPTIONTIMM HW.1983; JOURNAL OF POLICE SCIENCE AND ADMINISTRATION; ISSN 0090-9084; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 11; NO 1; PP. 62-68; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

DEVELOPMENT OF A LIE SCALE FOR THE CHILD ABUSE POTENTIAL INVENTORYMILNER JS.1982; PSYCHOL. REP.; ISSN 0033-2941; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 50; NO 3; PART. 1; PP. 871-874; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

GUILTY KNOWELEDGE VERSUS INNOCENT ASSOCIATIONS: EFFECTS OF TRAIT ANXIETY AND STIMULUS CONTEXT ON SKIN CONDUCTANCEGIESEN M; ROLLISON MA.1980; J. RES. PERSONALITY; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 14; NO 1; PP. 1-11; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

PHYSIOLOGICAL DETECTION OF DECEPTION: MEASUREMENT OF RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS DURING COUNTERMEASURE MANEUVERSDAWSON ME.1980; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 17; NO 1; PP. 8-17; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

THE TRUTH-DECEPTION ATTRIBUTION: EFFECTS OF FAMILIARITY ON THE ABILITY OF OBSERVERS TO DETECT DECEPTIONBRANDT DR; MILLER GR; HOCKING JE et al.1980; HUM. COMMUN. RES.; ISSN 0360-3989; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 6; NO 2; PP. 99-110; BIBL. 31 REF.Article

FBI GUIDELINES FOR USE OF HYPNOSISAULT RL JR.1979; INTERNATION. J. CLIN. EXPER. HYPNOS.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 27; NO 4; PP. 449-451; ABS. GER/FRE/SPAArticle

PSYCHOLOGICAL STRESS EVALUATOR: TWO TESTS OF A VOCAL MEASUREBRENNER M; BRANSCOMB HH; SCHWARTZ GE et al.1979; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 16; NO 4; PP. 351-357; BIBL. 2 P.Article

THE USE IN COURT OF HYPNOTICALLY ENHANCED TESTIMONYWORTHINGTON TS.1979; INTERNATION. J. CLIN. EXPER. HYPNOS.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 27; NO 4; PP. 402-416; ABS. GER/FRE/SPA; BIBL. 27 REF.Article

THE EYSENCK PERSONALITY INVENTORY LIE SCALE - SOME FURTHER AUSTRALIAN DATA.PRYKE MM; HARPER JF.1977; J. PERSONALITY ASSESS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 41; NO 6; PP. 632-634; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

DETECTING DECEPTION: THE RELATIONSHIP OF AVAILABLE INFORMATION TO JUDGMENTAL ACCURACY IN INITIAL ENCOUNTERSBAUCHNER JE; KAPLAN EA; MILLER GR et al.1980; HUM. COMMUN. RES.; ISSN 0360-3989; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 6; NO 3; PP. 253-264; BIBL. 31 REF.Article

DEFENDING THE MENTALLY ILL: THE INSANITY DEFENSE AND THE ROLE OF FORENSIC HYPNOSISKLINE MV.1979; INTERNATION. J. CLIN. EXPER. HYPNOS.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 27; NO 4; PP. 374-401; ABS. FRE/GER/SPA; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

DETECTION OF TEST CHEATING BEHAVIORHYNES K; GIVNER N; PATIL K et al.1978; PSYCHOL. REP.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 42; NO 3; PP. 1070; BIBL. 1 REF.Article