QUALITAETSSICHERUNG BEI DER MAMMOGRAPHIE II = CONTROLE DE QUALITE A LA MAMMOGRAPHIE. IIFRIEDRICH M.1980; ROEFO, FORTSCHR. GEB. ROENTGENSTR. NUKLEARMED.; ISSN 0340-1618; DEU; DA. 1980; VOL. 134; NO 3; PP. 242-250; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 56 REF.Article

Processing of mammographic films: technical and clinical considerationsTABAR, L; HAUS, A. G.Radiology. 1989, Vol 173, Num 1, pp 65-69, issn 0033-8419, 5 p.Conference Paper

Tomosynthèse: luxe ou nécessité = Tomosynthesis: luxury or necessity?TAOUREL, P; MERIGEAUD, S; AUBERT, E et al.Journal de radiologie (Paris). 2009, Vol 90, Num 12, pp 1813-1821, issn 0221-0363, 9 p.Article

Recommendation for ShortInterval Follow-Up Examinations After a Probably Benign Assessment: Is Clinical Practice Consistent With BI-RADS Guidance?AIELLO BOWLES, Erin J; SICKLES, Edward A; MIGLIORETTI, Diana L et al.American journal of roentgenology (1976). 2010, Vol 194, Num 4, pp 1152-1159, issn 0361-803X, 8 p.Article

MONTE CARLO SIMULATION STUDIES OF BACKSCATTER FACTORS IN MAMMOGRAPHYHEANG PING CHAN; KUNIO DOI.1981; RADIOLOGY; ISSN 0033-8419; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 139; NO 1; PP. 195-199; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

DAS FIBROADENOLIPOM (HAMARTOM) DER MAMMA = LE FIBROADENOLIPOME (HAMARTOME) DU SEINSKAANE P.1981; ROEFOE, FORTSCHR. GEB. ROENTGENSTR. NUKLEARMED.; ISSN 0340-1618; DEU; DA. 1981; VOL. 135; NO 6; PP. 747-748; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

An investigation into the effects of suboptimal viewing conditions in screen-film mammographyROBSON, K. J.British journal of radiology. 2008, Vol 81, Num 963, pp 219-231, issn 0007-1285, 13 p.Article

Digital mammographyPISANO, Etta D; YAFFE, Martin J.Radiology. 2005, Vol 234, Num 2, pp 353-362, issn 0033-8419, 10 p.Article

Digital Mammogram Enhancement Based on ROI Enhancement and Background SuppressionPENS, Renbin; VARSHNEY, Pramod K; HAO CHEN et al.Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering. 2008, pp 69141D.1-69141D.11, issn 0277-786X, isbn 978-0-8194-7098-0Conference Paper

HISTOLOGICAL LOCALISATION OF MAMMOGRAPHIC ABNORMALITIES IN BREAST BIOPSY SPECIMENSSTAMP GWH; MCDICKEN IW; WHITEHOUSE GH et al.1982; JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY; ISSN 0021-9746; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 35; NO 10; PP. 1163-1166; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

MAGNIFICATION MAMMOGRAPHY: EVALUATION OF SCREEN-FILM AND XERORADIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUESHAUS AG; PAULUS DD; DODD GD et al.1979; RADIOLOGY; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 133; NO 1; PP. 223-226; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

RECIPROCITY LAW FAILURE WITH FILM/SCREEN COMBINATIONS FOR MAMMOGRAPHY.SEELENTAG WW; PANZER W.1978; BRIT. J. RADIOL.; GBR; DA. 1978; VOL. 51; NO 607; PP. 529-531; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

FILM MAMMOGRAPHY: NEW LOW RADIATION TECHNOLOGY.CHANG CHJ; SIBALA JL; MARTIN NL et al.1976; RADIOLOGY; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 121; NO 1; PP. 215-217; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

ONE-VIEW MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING.LIBSHITZ HI; FETOUH S; ISLEY J et al.1976; RADIOLOGY; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 120; NO 3; PP. 719-722; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

Computer aided diagnosis for breast masses detection on a telemammography systemMENDEZ, Arturo J; SOUTO, Miguel; TAHOCES, Pablo G et al.Computerized medical imaging and graphics. 2003, Vol 27, Num 6, pp 497-502, issn 0895-6111, 6 p.Article

Les incidences complémentaires en mammographie = Additional mammographic projectionsCAMBIER, Luc.Imagerie de la femme. 2006, Vol 16, Num 1, pp 4-12, 9 p.Article

Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia: a study of the mammographic and sonographic featuresCELLIERS, L; WONG, D. D; BOURKE, A et al.Clinical radiology. 2010, Vol 65, Num 2, pp 145-149, issn 0009-9260, 5 p.Article

The effect of Premium View post-processing software on digital mammographic reportingGOLDSTRAW, E. J; CASTELLANO, I; ASHLEY, S et al.British journal of radiology. 2010, Vol 83, Num 986, pp 122-128, issn 0007-1285, 7 p.Article

Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation : Gaze-tracking studyKUNDEL, Harold L; NODINE, Calvin F; CONANT, Emily F et al.Radiology. 2007, Vol 242, Num 2, pp 396-402, issn 0033-8419, 7 p.Article

Mammographic film-processor temperature, development time, and chemistry: effect on dose, contrast, and noiseKIMME-SMITH, C; ROTHSCHILD, P. A; BASSETT, L. W et al.American journal of roentgenology (1976). 1989, Vol 152, Num 1, pp 35-40, issn 0361-803X, 6 p.Article

Proceedings/3rd. Symposium mammographicum, London, September 12-13, 1985British journal of radiology. 1986, Vol 59, Num 702, pp 631-642, issn 0007-1285Conference Proceedings

Tungsten anode tubes with K-edge filters for mammography = Tubes à anode en tungstène avec filtres «K-edge» en mammographieBEAMAN, S; LILLICRAP, S. C; PRICE, J. L et al.British journal of radiology. 1983, Vol 56, Num 670, pp 721-727, issn 0007-1285Article

Mammographic Screening and OverdiagnosisKOPANS, Daniel B; SMITH, Robert A; DUFFY, Stephen W et al.Radiology. 2011, Vol 260, Num 3, pp 616-620, issn 0033-8419, 5 p.Article

Community-based mammography practice: Services, charges, and interpretation methodsHENDRICK, R. Edward; CUTTER, Gary R; ELMORE, Joann G et al.American journal of roentgenology (1976). 2005, Vol 184, Num 2, pp 433-438, issn 0361-803X, 6 p.Article

La mammographie dans le dépistage précoce du cancer du sein = Mammography and breast cancer institute screeningLEFRANC, J. P; BLONDON, J.Gynécologie (Paris. 1973). 1984, Vol 35, Num 1, pp 23-30, issn 0301-2204Article