AUDITORY FREQUENCY SELECTIVITY IN NORMAL AND PRESBYCUSIC SUBJECTSMARGOLIS RH; GOLDBERG SM.1980; J. SPEECH HEAR. RES.; ISSN 0022-4685; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 23; NO 3; PP. 603-613; BIBL. 1 P.Article

STATIC AND DYNAMIC ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE MEASUREMENTS IN INFANT EARS = MESURE DE L'IMPEDANCE ACOUSTIQUE STATIQUE ET DYNAMIQUE DANS LES OREILLES DE NOURRISSONSMARGOLIS RH; POPELKA GR.1975; J. SPEECH HEARG RES.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 18; NO 3; PP. 435-443; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

A COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS FOR PREDICTING HEARING LOSS FROM ACOUSTIC REFLEX THRESHOLDS.MARGOLIS RH; FOX CM.1977; J. SPEECH HEARG RES.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 20; NO 2; PP. 241-253; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

THE MEASUREMENT OF CRITICAL MASKING BANDS. = MESURE DES BANDES DE MASQUAGE CRITIQUESMARGOLIS RH; SMALL AM.1975; J. SPEECH HEARG RES.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 18; NO 3; PP. 571-587; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

TYMPANOMETRIC ASYMMETRY.MARGOLIS RH; SMITH P.1977; J. SPEECH HEARG RES.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 20; NO 3; PP. 437-446; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

LOUDNESS AND THE ACOUSTIC REFLEX = FORCE D'UN BRUIT ET REFLEXE ACOUSTIQUEMARGOLIS RH; POPELKA GR.1975; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 58; NO 6; PP. 1330-1332; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

MASKING WITH NARROW-BAND FM NOISEMARGOLIS RH; SMALL AM JR.1974; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 56; NO 2; PP. 692-694; BIBL. 12REF.Article

THE EFFECTS OF EXPERIMENTALLY-PRODUCED MIDDLE EAR LESIONS ON TYMPANOMETRY IN CATSMARGOLIS RH; OSGUTHORPE JD; POPELKA GR et al.1978; ACTA OTO-LARYNGOL.; SWE; DA. 1978; VOL. 86; NO 5-6; PP. 428-436; ABS. GER; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

A TECHNIQUE FOR DETECTING THE IPSILATERAL ACOUSTIC REFLEXMARGOLIS RH; WILSON RH; VAN CAMP KJ et al.1982; J. ACOUST. SOC. AM.; ISSN 0001-4966; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 72; NO 1; PP. 278-280; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

ACOUSTIC-REFLEX THRESHOLDS FOR NOISE STIMULIMARGOLIS RH; DUBNO JR; WILSON RH et al.1980; J. ACOUST. SOC. AM.; ISSN 0001-4966; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 68; NO 3; PP. 892-895; BIBL. 12 REF.Article