THE MASS DIFFERENCE OF THE MUON AND THE ELECTRONHOYLE F; NARLIKAR JV.1972; NATURE; G.B.; DA. 1972; VOL. 238; NO 5359; PP. 86-87; BIBL. 3 REF.Serial Issue

ELECTROMAGNETIC MASS SHIFT OF HADRONSKUNIMASA T.1972; PROGR. THEOR. PHYS.; JAP.; DA. 1972; VOL. 48; NO 6B; PP. 2391-2398; BIBL. 13 REF.Serial Issue

REAKTSIYA GAMMA +GAMMA ->PI +PI I EHLEKTROMAGNITNAYA RAZNOST PIONOV = REACTION GAMMA GAMMA ->PI PI ET DIFFERENCE ELECTROMAGNETIQUE POUR LES MASSES DES PIONSISAEV PS; KHLESKOV VI.1972; JINR-P2-6333; U.R.S.S.; DA. 1972; PP. (26 P.); ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 23 REF.; MICROFICHEReport

GAUGE THEORIES, CHIRAL INVARIANCE AND ELECTROMAGNETIC MASS DIFFERENCESBARDAKCI K.1973; NUCL. PHYS., B; NETHERL.; DA. 1973; VOL. 51; PP. 174-188; BIBL. 10 REF.Serial Issue

TOWARDS A UNIVERSAL MASS FORMULA FOR ELEMENTARY PARTICLESSIVARAM C; SINHA KP.1973; CURR. SCI.; INDIA; DA. 1973; VOL. 42; NO 1; PP. 4-6; BIBL. 5 REF.Serial Issue

SODIUM CORROSION AND MASS TRANSFER ANALYSIS WITH AN ION PROBE MASS SPECTROMETERBERKEY E; SWEENEY GG; HICKAM WM et al.1972; NUCL. TECHNOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 16; NO 1; PP. 263-277; BIBL. 18 REF.Serial Issue

DEEP INELASTIC CONTRIBUTION TO ELECTROMAGNETIC MASS DIFFERENCEOKUMURA Y.1972; PROGR. THEOR. PHYS.; JAP.; DA. 1972; VOL. 48; NO 2; PP. 490-498; BIBL. 10 REF.Serial Issue

PARTONS, ELECTROMAGNETIC MASS SHIFTS, AND THE APPROACH TO SCALINGWEISBERGER WI.1972; PHYS. REV., D; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 5; NO 10; PP. 2600-2609; BIBL. 24 REF.Serial Issue

THE K_L-K_S MASS DIFFERENCE IN A CHIRAL APPROACHRIAZUDDIN; FAYYAZUDDIN.1972; DNPL-P-124; G.B.; DA. 1972; PP. 1-6; BIBL. 5 REF.Report

NIVEAU MARIN A BARENTSBOURG EN TANT QU'INDICE DE L'INTRUSION DES EAUX DE L'ATLANTIQUE DANS LE BASSIN ARCTIQUEMANDEL SZ.1976; ARKTICH. ANTARKTICH. NAUCHNO-ISSLEDOVAT. INST., TRUDY, LENINGRAD; S.S.S.R.; DA. 1976; VOL. 319; PP. 129-136; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

TRANSPORT D'EAUX DU PACIFIQUE A TRAVERS LA PARTIE NORD DE LA MER DE BEHRINGTIGUNTSEV LA.1976; ARKTICH. ANTARKTICH. NAUCHNO-ISSLEDOVAT. INST., TRUDY, LENINGRAD; S.S.S.R.; DA. 1976; VOL. 319; PP. 164-174; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

HOW TO OBTAIN THE CORRECT NEUTRON-PROTON MASS DIFFERENCEYOSHII H.1972; NUCL. PHYS., B; NETHERL.; DA. 1972; VOL. 50; PP. 10-16; BIBL. 10 REF.Serial Issue

LA REALITE DE LA RELATION NON LINEAIRE ENTRE LES MASSES DU VIRIEL ET OBSERVEE POUR DES GROUPES DE GALAXIESOZERNOJ LM.1974; ASTR. CIRK., IZDAV. BJURO ASTR. SOOBSHCH. AKAD. NAUK S.S.S.R.; S.S.S.R.; DA. 1974; NO 844; PP. 4-7Article

PHENOMENOLOGICAL MASS OPERATOR FOR HADRONS. IITO D; FERREIRA PL.1972; LETTERE NUOVO CIMENTO; ITAL.; DA. 1972; VOL. 5; NO 15; PP. 998-1000; BIBL. 3 REF.Serial Issue

BINARY GALAXIES AND MASSIVE HALOS.TURNER EL.1976; COMMENTS ON ASTROPHYS.; G.B.; DA. 1976; VOL. 6; NO 5; PP. 127-132; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

DYNAMICAL MASSES AND MASS-TO-LIGHT RATIOS FOR GLOBULAR CLUSTERS.ILLINGWORTH G.1975; INTERNATION. ASTR. UN., SYMP.; NETHERL.; DA. 1975; NO 69; PP. 151-157; BIBL. 33 REF.; (DYN. STELLAR SYST. SYMP.; BESANCON; 1974)Conference Paper

SUBTRACTION PIECE IN THE COTTINGHAM FORMULA FOR THE P-N MASS DIFFERENCEMUTA T.1972; PROGR. THEOR. PHYS.; JAP.; DA. 1972; VOL. 48; NO 5; PP. 1596-1605; BIBL. 27 REF.Serial Issue

LA REACTION GAMMA +GAMMA ->PI +PI ET DIFFERENCE DE MASSE ELECTROMAGNETIQUE DES PIONSISAEV PS; KHLESKOV VI.1972; JADER. FIZ.; S.S.S.R.; DA. 1972; VOL. 16; NO 5; PP. 1012-1022; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 26 REF.Serial Issue

A MASS FORMULA FOR RESONANCES WITH IDENTICAL STRANGENESS, PARITY, ORDINARY AND ISOTOPIC SPINKALMAN CS; PATERA J.1972; LETTERE NUOVO CIMENTO; ITAL.; DA. 1972; VOL. 5; NO 1; PP. 78-80; BIBL. 2 REF.Serial Issue

SUR LA MODIFICATION DES SURFACES EQUIPOTENTIELLES DANS LES SYSTEMES BINAIRES DUS A LA PRESSION DU RAYONNEMENT DE SES COMPOSANTESZOREC J; NIEMELA V.1980; C.R. HEBD. SEANCES ACAD. SCI., SCI. B; ISSN 0302-8437; FRA; DA. 1980; VOL. 290; NO 4; PP. 67-70; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS WITH RESPECT TO COUPLING CONSTANTS: ELECTROMAGNETIC MASS DIFFERENCE OF HADRONSSOLN J.1972; PHYS. REV., D; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 6; NO 8; PP. 2276-2291; BIBL. DISSEM.Serial Issue

CONJECTURE ON THE APPROACH TO SCALING IN DEEP-INELASTIC ELECTRON SCATTERING AND SOME COMMENTS ON ELECTROMAGNETIC MASS DIFFERENCESWEST GB.1972; PHYS. REV., D; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 5; NO 8; PP. 1987-1991; BIBL. 18 REF.Serial Issue

MASSES AND MASS-TO-LIGHT RATIOS OF GALAXIESFABER SM; GALLAGHER JS.1979; ANNU. REV. ASTR. ASTROPHYS.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 17; PP. 135-187; BIBL. 4 P.Conference Paper

IS ACTIVE GRAVITATIONAL MASS EQUAL TO INERTIAL MASS.ENOSH M; KOVETZ A.1978; INTERNATION. J. THEOR. PHYS.; GBR; DA. 1978; VOL. 17; NO 7; PP. 549-555; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

LA FONCTION INITIALE DE MASSE DES ETOILES EST-ELLE MONOTONE.PISKUNOV A EH; TUTUKOV AV; YUNGEL'SON LR et al.1979; PIS'MA ASTR. ZH.; SUN; DA. 1979; VOL. 5; NO 2; PP. 81-85; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 26 REF.Article