Pascal and Francis Bibliographic Databases

Help

Search results

Your search

kw.\*:("METHODOLOGICAL BIAS")

Filter

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Document Type [dt]

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Publication Year[py]

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Discipline (document) [di]

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Language

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Author Country

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Origin

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Results 1 to 25 of 2866

  • Page / 115
Export

Selection :

  • and

RESPONSE BIASES IN MULTIPLE-CHOICE TEST ITEM FILESMENTZER TL.1982; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEAS.; ISSN 0013-1644; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 42; NO 2; PP. 437-448; BIBL. 2 P.Article

FICTITIOUS DATA IN DRUG ABUSE RESEARCHINCIARDI JA.1981; INT. J. ADDICT.; ISSN 0020-773X; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 16; NO 2; PP. 377-380Article

VISIBILITY AND BIAS IN AVIAN FORAGING DATAWAGNER JL.1981; CONDOR; ISSN 0010-5422; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 83; NO 3; PP. 263-264; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

METHODISCHE PROBLEME DER LIFE-EVENT-FORSCHUNG = PROBLEMES METHODOLOGIQUES DE LA RECHERCHE DES EVENEMENTS DE LA VIEKATSCHNIG H.1980; NERVENARZT; DEU; DA. 1980; VOL. 51; NO 6; PP. 332-343; BIBL. 2 P.Article

INSTRUCTION BIAS AND SIMPLE REACTION TIMEBARTELS M; BECK J; CLAYSON D et al.1979; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 48; NO 3 PART. 1; PP. 774; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

MODELS FOR BIASES IN JUDJING SENSORY MAGNITUDEPOULTON EC.1979; PSYCHOL. BULL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 86; NO 4; PP. 777-803; BIBL. 2 P.Article

THE IMPACT OF SEVERELY DAMAGED CELLS IN CYTOGENETIC RESEARCHWHORTON EB JR; BEE DE; BEWGE MC et al.1979; MUTATION RES.; NLD; DA. 1979; VOL. 64; NO 2; PP. 87-89; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

A GENERAL EXPERIMENTWISE ERROR RATE FOR MULTIPLE SIGNIFICANCE TESTS.RULE SJ.1976; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 43; NO 3 PART. 2; PP. 1263-1277; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

LANGUAGE AND COGNITION. THE CHANGED SOCIAL CONTEXT OF TESTINGGORDON EW; TERRELL MD.1982; ANN. PROG. CHILD PSYCHIATRY CHILD DEV.; ISSN 0066-4030; USA; DA. 1982; PP. 291-299; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

UN UNUSUALLY POWERFULL RESPONSE-BIAS EFFECTSARGENT C.1982; PARAPSYCHOL. REV.; ISSN 0031-1804; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 13; NO 3; PP. 8-10; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

BIAS IN THE ESTIMATION OF HERITABILITY FROM TRUNCATED SAMPLES OF TWINSMARTIN NG; WILSON SR.1982; BEHAVIOR GENETICS; ISSN 0001-8244; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 12; NO 4; PP. 467-472; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

DIVERGENT AMPLIFICATION AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR: SOME METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONSLONDON ID; THORNGATE W.1981; PSYCHOL. REP.; ISSN 0033-2941; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 48; NO 1; PP. 203-228; BIBL. 5 P.Article

TEST BIAS: THE OTHER SIDE OF THE COINROSENBACH JH; MOWDER BA.1981; PSYCHOL. SCH.; ISSN 0033-3085; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 18; NO 4; PP. 450-454; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

USE OF ODDS OF PATERNITY COMPUTATIONS IN DETERMINING THE RELIABILITY OF SINGLE EXCLUSIONS IN PATERNITY TESTINGRANAJIT CHAKRABORTY; RYMAN N.1981; HUM. HERED.; ISSN 0001-5652; CHE; DA. 1981; VOL. 31; NO 6; PP. 363-369; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

ERROR OF MEASUREMENT AND STATISTICAL INFERENCE: SOME ANOMALIESWILLIAMS RH; ZIMMERMAN DW.1980; J. EXP. EDUC.; ISSN 0022-0973; USA; DA. 1980-1981; VOL. 49; NO 2; PP. 71-73; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

DOMAIN VALIDITY-WHY CARE.ROZEBOOM WW.1978; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEASUR.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 38; NO 1; PP. 81-88; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

ACCURACY IN SELF-PERCEPTION: THE "FALLACY OF PERSONAL VALIDATION".HAMPSON SE; GILMOUR R; HARRIS PL et al.1978; BRIT. J. SOC. CLIN. PSYCHOL.; GBR; DA. 1978; VOL. 17; NO 3; PP. 231-235; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

EXTREMITY AND "DON'T KNOW" SETS IN QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSE.INNES JM.1977; BRIT. J. SOC. CLIN. PSYCHOL.; G.B.; DA. 1977; VOL. 16; NO 1; PP. 9-12; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

ON EXPERIMENTER-LIMITED PROCESSES.KANTOWITZ BH; KNIGHT JL JR.1976; PSYCHOL. REV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 83; NO 6; PP. 502-507; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

DISCOVERING A GOOD AGENOVAK M.1983; INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGING AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT; ISSN 0091-4150; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 16; NO 3; PP. 231-239; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

THE UNBIASEDNESS OF THE MIRAGE CORRECTION PROCEDURE FOR BOUNDARY OVERLAPGREGOIRE TG.1982; FOREST SCIENCE; ISSN 0015-749X; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 28; NO 3; PP. 504-508; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

ALPHABETIC NOTATION BIAS IN BLIND TEST RESEARCHDEAN ML.1982; J. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-3980; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 111; PP. 269-271; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

SEX BIAS IN RESEARCH DESIGNGRADY KE.1981; PSYCHOL. WOMEN Q.; ISSN 0361-6843; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 5; NO 4; PP. 628-636; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

THE EFFECTS OF INSTRUCTIONS AND CALCULATION PROCEDURES ON OBSERVERS' ACCURACY, AGREEMENT, AND CALCULATION CORRECTNESSBOYKIN RA; NELSON RO.1981; J. APPL. BEHAV. ANAL.; ISSN 0021-8855; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 14; NO 4; PP. 479-489; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

THE IMPACT OF INTERVIEWER VARIABILITY IN AN EPIDEMIOLOGICAL SURVEYO'MUIRCHEARTAIGH CA; WIGGINS RD.1981; PSYCHOL. MED.; ISSN 0033-2917; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 11; NO 4; PP. 817-824; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

  • Page / 115