TRENDS IN ACCURACY OF COUNTING BIRDSPRATER J.1979; BIRD STUDY; GBR; DA. 1979; VOL. 26; NO 3; PP. 198-200; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

PROPERTIES OF ONE-ZERO SCORES IN OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES OF PRIMATE SOCIAL BEHAVIOR: THE EFFECT OF ASSUMPTIONS ON EMPIRICAL ANALYSESRHINE RJ; LINVILLE AK.1980; PRIMATES; JPN; DA. 1980; VOL. 21; NO 1; PP. 111-122; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

PROBLEMS INHERENT IN OBTAINING THE ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE REACTIONDOTY SB.1980; J. HISTOCHEM. CYTOCHEM.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 28; NO 1; PP. 66-68; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

PACHOMETRY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN TOUCH AND OVERLAP MEASUREMENT METHODMOLINARI JF; BONDS T.1983; AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS; ISSN 0093-7002; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 60; NO 1; PP. 61-66; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

NIGHTJAR CENSUS METHODSCADBURY CJ.1981; BIRD STUDY; ISSN 0006-3657; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 28; PART. 1; PP. 1-4; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

STUDIES ON METHODS OF CENSURING THE NUMBERS OF BEES (HYMENOPTERA, APOIDEA)BANASZAK J.1980; POL. ECOL. STUD.; ISSN 0324-8763; POL; DA. 1980; VOL. 6; NO 2; PP. 355-365; ABS. POL; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

AN OBJECTIVE METHOD OF MEASURING THE VEGETATION STRUCTURE OF ANIMAL HABITATSFOX BJ.1979; AUSTRAL. WILDLIFE RES.; AUS; DA. 1979; VOL. 6; NO 3; PP. 297-303; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS FOR ESTIMATING THE NUMBERS OF COMMON RATS (RATTUS NORVEGICUS)TAYLOR KD; QUY RJ; GURNELL J et al.1981; MAMMALIA; ISSN 0025-1461; FRA; DA. 1981; VOL. 45; NO 4; PP. 403-413; ABS. FRE; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

THE SUITABILITY OF VARIOUS ADHESIVES AS MOUNTING MEDIA FOR SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY. I: EPOXIES, SPRAYS AND TAPESWITCOMB MJ.1981; J. MICROSC. (OXF.); ISSN 0022-2720; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 121; NO 3; PP. 289-308; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

THE DOMINANT FISH FAUNA IN THE NORTH SEA AND ITS DETERMINATIONJIMING Y.1982; J. FISH BIBL.; ISSN 0022-1112; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 20; NO 6; PP. 635-643; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

AN EVALUATION OF ACCURACY, PRECISION, AND SPEED OF SEVERAL ZOOPLANKTON SUBSAMPLING TECHNIQUESVAN GUELPEN L; MARKLE DF; DUGGAN DJ et al.1982; J. CONS.-CONS. INT. EXPLOR. MER; ISSN 0020-6466; DNK; DA. 1982; VOL. 40; NO 3; PP. 226-236; BIBL. 28 REF.Article

RADIO TRANSMITTERS FOR MOURNING DOVES. A COMPARISON OF ATTACHMENT TECHNIQUESPERRY MC; HAAS GH; CARPENTER JW et al.1981; J. WILDL. MANAGE.; ISSN 0022-541X; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 45; NO 2; PP. 524-527; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT METHODS OF GROWTH VALUES COMPUTATION ILLUSTRATED ON RUDD SCALES (PISCES: CYPRINIDAE)NOVAK J.1982; VESTN. CESK. SPOL. ZOOL.; ISSN 0042-4595; CSK; DA. 1982; VOL. 46; NO 1; PP. 25-32; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

METHODES DE DETERMINATION DE L'AGE DE MUGIL-SO-IUY BASILEWSKYSHVYDKIJ GV; VASIL'KOV VP; KRAVCHENKO TV et al.1981; BIOL. MOR., VLADIVOSTOK; ISSN 0134-3475; SUN; DA. 1981; NO 4; PP. 78-82; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

A NEW CORER FOR SAMPLING SAND AND MORAINE BOTTOM MEIOFAUNARAISANEN P; TIMOLA O; VALTONEN T et al.1981; ANN. ZOOL. FENN.; ISSN 0003-455X; FIN; DA. 1981; VOL. 18; NO 2; PP. 133-137; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

DEMONSTRATION OF SULFHYDRYL AND DISULFIDE GROUPS BY A FLUORESCENT MALEIMIDE PROCEDURECURTIS SK; COWDEN RR.1980; HISTOCHEMISTRY; DEU; DA. 1980; VOL. 68; NO 1; PP. 23-28; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

THE EFFECTS OF AGE AND WEAR ON COLOR BANDSANDERSON A.1980; J. FIELD ORNITHOL.; ISSN 0006-3630; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 51; NO 3; PP. 213-219; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

PRAMETERS OF AUDITORY FEEDBACKSCHORK EJ JR; PICK HL JR; GARBER SR et al.1982; JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH; ISSN 0022-4685; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 25; NO 3; PP. 473-475; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

MICROSPECTROPHOTOMETRIC STUDIES OF ROMANOWSKY STAINED BLOOD CELLS. II: COMPARISON OF THE PERFORMANCE OF TWO STANDARDIZED STAINSMARSHALL PN; GALBRAITH W; NAVARRO EF et al.1981; J. MICROSC. (OXF.); ISSN 0022-2720; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 124; NO 2; PP. 197-210; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

IDENTIFICATION AUDIOMETRY: COMPONENT EFFECTIVENESS AND RELATIONSHIP OF HEARING STATUS TO DEVELOPMENTAL FUNCTIONING WITH FOUR-YEAR-OLDSTHOMPSON RJ JR; GOTHARD DC; STURM JM et al.1979; J. AUD. RES.; ISSN 0021-9177; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 19; NO 3; PP. 209-215; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

MISUSE OF ORIENTATION STATISTICSCHILDS SB; BUCHLER ER.1982; CAN. J. ZOOL.; ISSN 0008-4301; CAN; DA. 1982; VOL. 60; NO 3; PP. 475-477; ABS. FRE; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

RELATIVE EFFICIENCY OF TWO SMALL MAMMAL TRAPSRANA BD.1982; ACTA OECOL., OECOL. APPL.; ISSN 0243-7678; FRA; DA. 1982; VOL. 3; NO 2; PP. 149-153; ABS. FRE; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

COMPARISON OF THE SAMPLING EFFICIENCY OF TWO VAN VEEN GRABSANDERSIN AB; SANDLER H.1981; FINN. MAR. RES.; ISSN 0357-1076; FIN; DA. 1981; NO 248; PP. 137-142; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR RECONSTRUCTING EVOLUTIONARY TREESASTOLFI P; KIDD KK; CAVALLI SFORZA LL et al.1981; SYST. ZOOL.; ISSN 0039-7989; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 30; NO 2; PP. 156-169; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

GUIDELINES FOR STATISTICAL USAGE IN AGE-ESTIMATION TECHNICSDAPSON RW.1980; J. WILDL. MANAGE.; ISSN 0022-541X; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 44; NO 3; PP. 541-548; BIBL. 8 REF.Article