A SINGLE-BULLET DUEL WITH UNCERTAIN INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE DUELISTSTERAOKA Y.1979; BULL. MATH. STATIST.; JPN; DA. 1979; VOL. 18; NO 3-4; PP. 69-83; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

AN ANALYTICAL MINEFIELD EVALUATION MODEL WITHOUT SPACE AVERAGES.MJELDE KM.1977; NAV. RES. LOGIST. QUART.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 24; NO 4; PP. 639-650; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

QUALITATIVE BEHAVIOUR OF SOLUTIONS TO SOME NON-LINEAR LANCHESTER-TYPE MODELS THAT CONSIDER PARALLEL ACQUISITION OF TARGETSTAYLOR JG.1982; INT. J. SYST. SCI.; ISSN 0020-7721; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 13; NO 7; PP. 709-731; BIBL. 34 REF.Article

THEORETICAL ANALYSIS ON THE GENERAL LINEAR MODEL FOR LANCHESTER-TYPE COMBAT BETWEEN TWO HOMOGENEOUS FORCESTAYLOR JG.1982; NAVAL RESEARCH LOGISTICS QUARTERLY; ISSN 0028-1441; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 29; NO 4; PP. 617-633; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

ANALYSIS OF THE FUNCTIONAL DEPENDENCE OF THE MODIFIED PARITY CONDITION PARAMETER ON ITS ARGUMENT FOR AN IMPORTANT CLASS OF LANCHESTER-TYPE EQUATIONS FOR MODERN WARFARETAYLOR JG.1982; INT. J. SYST. SCI.; ISSN 0020-7721; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 13; NO 2; PP. 115-136; BIBL. 1 P.Article

EVALUATION OF FORCE STRUCTURES UNDER UNCERTAINTYJOHNSON CR; LOANE EP.1980; NAV. RES. LOGIST. Q.; ISSN 0028-1441; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 27; NO 3; PP. 511-519; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

OPTIMAL TACTICS FOR CLOSE SUPPORT OPERATIONS. VI: SUMMARY OF NUMERICAL RESULTS = TACTIQUES OPTIMALES POUR LES OPERATIONS DE SOUTIEN RAPPROCHE. VI: RESUME DE RESULTATS NUMERIQUESKAGIWADA H; KALABA R; SPINGARN K et al.1980; J. OPTIMIZ. THEORY APPL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 30; NO 4; PP. 589-600; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

A WAR OF ATTRITION AND ATTACK WITH DECREASING RATES OF WEAPONS SUPPLYMJELDE KM.1980; CAH. CENTRE ET. RECH. OPERAT.; BEL; DA. 1980; VOL. 22; NO 1; PP. 111-123; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

SURVIVAL DISTRIBUTIONS IN CROSSING FIELDS CONTAINING CLUSTERS OF MINES WITH POSSIBLE DETECTION AND UNCERTAIN ACTIVATION OR KILLZACKS S.1979; NAV. RES. LOGIST. QUART.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 26; NO 3; PP. 423-435; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE FORCE RATIO AND THE INSTANTANEOUS CASUALTY-EXCHANGE RATIO FOR SOME LANCHESTER-TYPE MODELS OF WARFARE.TAYLOR JG.1976; NAV. RES. LOGIST. QUART.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 23; NO 2; PP. 345-352; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

A MEASURE OF EFFECTIVENESS FOR SENSORS AND STRATEGIES.ANTONIAK CE.1976; NAV. RES. LOGIST. QUART.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 23; NO 2; PP. 283-296; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

FORCE-ANNIHILATION CONDITIONS FOR VARIABLE-COEFFICIENT LANCHESTER-TYPE EQUATIONS OF MODERN WARFARE.TAYLOR JG; COMSTOCK C.1977; NAV. RES. LOGIST. QUART.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 24; NO 2; PP. 349-371; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

APPROXIMATE PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS FOR THE EXTREME SPREAD.TAYLOR MS; GRUBBS FE.1976; NAV. RES. LOGIST. QUART.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 22; NO 4; PP. 713-719; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

ANNIHILATION PREDICTION FOR LANCHESTER-TYPE MODELS OF MODERN WARFARETAYLOR JG; BROWN GG.1983; OPERATIONS RESEARCH; ISSN 0030-364X; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 31; NO 4; PP. 752-771; BIBL. 2 P.Article

ANALYSIS OF A LAYERED DEFENSE MODEL = ANALYSE D'UN MODELE DE DEFENSE EN COUCHESNUNN WR; GLASS DV; HSU IC et al.1982; OPER. RES.; ISSN 0030-364X; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 30; NO 3; PP. 595-599; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

STOCHASTIC DUELS WITH DISPLACEMENTS (SUPPRESSION) = DUELS STOCHASTIQUES AVEC DEPLACEMENTS (SUPPRESSION)WILLIAMS GT; ANCKER CJ JR.1981; NAV. RES. LOGIST. Q.; ISSN 0028-1441; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 28; NO 3; PP. 519-524; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

SYSTEMS DEFENSE GAMES: "COLONEL BLOTTO", COMMAND AND CONTROLSHUBIK M; WEBER RJ.1981; NAV. RES. LOGIST. Q.; ISSN 0028-1441; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 28; NO 2; PP. 281-287; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

LANCHESTER-TYPE EQUATIONS OF COMBAT WHICH ACCOUNT FOR MULTIPLE KILLING HITSMANGULIS V.1980; OPER. RES.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 28; NO 3; PART. 1; PP. 560-569; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF LANCHESTER-TYPE COMBAT BETWEEN TWO HOMOGENEOUS FORCES WITH SUPPORTING FIRESTAYLOR JG.1980; NAV. RES. LOGIST. Q.; ISSN 0028-1441; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 27; NO 1; PP. 109-121; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

PREDICTION OF ZERO POINTS OF SOLUTIONS TO LANCHESTER-TYPE DIFFERENTIAL COMBAT EQUATIONS FOR MODERN WARFARETAYLOR JG.1979; S.I.A.M.J. APPL. MATH.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 36; NO 3; PP. 438-456; BIBL. 24 REF.Article

AN OPERATIONAL CRITIQUE OF DETECTION LAWSKOOPMAN BO.1979; OPER. RES.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 27; NO 1; PP. 115-133; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

GEFECHTSGLEICHUNGEN ZUR BESCHREIBUNG VON SEEGEFECHTEN. = EQUATIONS DE COMBAT POUR LA DESCRIPTION DE COMBATS NAVALSDAHM U.1977; Z. OPER. RES.; DTSCH.; DA. 1977; VOL. 21; NO 2; PP. B37-B60; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

BOARD WARGAMES FOR DECISION MAKING RESEARCHCOOPER DF; KLEIN J.1980; EUROP. J. OPERAT. RES.; NLD; DA. 1980; VOL. 5; NO 1; PP. 36-41; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

DAMAGE CALCULATIONS FOR UNRELIABLE WARHEADSCURRAN RT; JACQUETTE SC; POLITZER JL et al.1979; NAV. RES. LOGIST. QUART.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 26; NO 3; PP. 545-549; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

Page / 9