EVALUATION OF THE MINITEK SYSTEM FOR IDENTIFICATION OF ENTEROBACTERIACEAEKIEHN TE; BRENNAN K; ELLNER PD et al.1974; APPL. MICROBIOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 28; NO 4; PP. 668-671; BIBL. 1 REF.Article

EVALUATION OF MODIFIED NEW YORK CITY CARBOHYDRATE MEDIUM FOR THE SPECIATION OF NEISSERIASIMMS DH; LUE YA.1982; SEX. TRANSM. DIS.; ISSN 0148-5717; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 9; NO 1; PP. 34-36; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

A SIMPLIFIED BIOCHEMICAL SYSTEM TO SCREEN SALMONELLA ISOLATES FROM POULTRY FOR SEROTYPING.COX NA; WILLIAMS JE.1976; POULTRY SCI.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 55; NO 5; PP. 1968-1971; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

MODIFICATION OF THE MINITEK MINIATURIZED DIFFERENTIATION SYSTEM FOR CHARACTERIZATION OF ANAEROBIC BACTERIA.STARGEL MD; THOMPSON FS; PHILLIPS SE et al.1976; J. CLIN. MICROBIOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 3; NO 3; PP. 291-301; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

BIOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND IDENTIFICATION OF ENTEROBACTERIACEAE ISOLATED FROM NEATSSTILES ME; LAI KING NG.1981; APPL. ENVIRON. MICROBIOL.; ISSN 0099-2240; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 41; NO 3; PP. 639-645; BIBL. 29 REF.Article

EVALUATION OF THE MINITEK SYSTEM FOR IDENTIFICATION OF NON FERMENTATIVE AND NONENTERIC FERMENTATIVE GRAM NEGATIVE BACTERIACHESTER B; CLEARY T.1980; J. CLIN. MICROB.; ISSN 0095-1137; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 12; NO 4; PP. 509-516; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

EVALUATION OF 36 MINITEK TESTS AND A NEW APPROACH FOR IDENTIFICATION OF NONFERMENTERSYABUUCHI E; YAMANAKA K; OHYAMA A et al.1981; J. CLIN. MICROBIOL.; ISSN 0095-1137; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 13; NO 3; PP. 572-587; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

COMPARISON OF THE MINITEK SYSTEM WITH CONVENTIONAL METHODS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF NONFERMENTATIVE AND OXIDASE-POSITIVE FERMENTATIVE GRAM-NEGATIVE BACILLIWELLSTOOD NUESSE S.1979; J. CLIN. MICROBIOL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 9; NO 4; PP. 511-516; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

COMPARISON OF API AND MINITEK TO CENTER FOR DISEASE CONTROL METHODS FOR THE BIOCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ANAEROBES.HANSEN SL; STEWART BJ.1976; J. CLIN. MICROBIOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 4; NO 3; PP. 227-231; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

COMPARISON OF MICRO-ID AND MINITEK-SEROLOGY SYSTEMS FOR RAPID IDENTIFICATION OF SALMONELLACOX NA; BAILEY JS; THOMSON JE et al.1981; J. FOOD PROT.; ISSN 0362-028X; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 44; NO 6; PP. 442-444; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

VERGLEICH VON API-10S UND MINITEK MIT KONVENTIONELLER BUNTER REIHE = COMPARAISON DES SYSTEMES API-10S ET MINITEK ET DES TESTS BIOCHIMIQUES CONVENTIONNELSSTANEK G; HIRSCHL A; ROTTER M et al.1980; ZBL. BAKTERIOL. PARASITENKDE INFEKT.-KRANKH. HYG., 1, A; DEU; DA. 1980; VOL. 246; NO 1; PP. 67-73; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

FOUR METHODS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF GRAM-NEGATIVE NONFERMENTING RODS: ORGANISMS MORE COMMONLY ENCOUNTERED IN CLINICAL SPECIMENSAPPELBAUM PC; STAVITZ J; BENTZ MS et al.1980; J. CLIN. MICROBIOL.; ISSN 0095-1137; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 12; NO 2; PP. 271-278; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

Rapid identification of group JK and other corynebacteria with the Minitek systemSLIFKIN, M; GIL, G. M; ENGWALL, C et al.Journal of clinical microbiology (Print). 1986, Vol 24, Num 2, pp 177-180, issn 0095-1137Article

COMPARISON OF FOUR METHODS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF GRAM-NEGATIVE NON-FERMENTERS: ORGANISMS LESS COMMONLY ENCOUNTERED IN CLINICAL SPECIMENSAPPELBAUM PC; STAVITZ J; BENTZ MS et al.1981; MED. MICROBIOL. IMMUNOL.; ISSN 0300-8584; DEU; DA. 1981; VOL. 169; NO 3; PP. 163-168; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

MINITEK INOCULUM BROTH FOR TESTING INDOLE PRODUCTION BY ENTEROBACTERIACEAECOX NA; THOMSON JE; BAILEY JS et al.1981; J. FOOD PROT.; ISSN 0362-028X; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 44; NO 6; PP. 445-446; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

A COMPARISON OF FOUR COMMERCIAL SYSTEMS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF NONFERMENTATIVE GRAM-NEGATIVE BACILLIBURDASH NM; BANNISTER ER; MANOS JP et al.1980; AMER. J. CLIN. PATHOL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 73; NO 4; PP. 564-569; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

A RESEARCH NOTE: EVALUATION OF FOUR ONPG TESTS FOR ENTEROBACTERIACEAE FROM HUMAN, ANIMAL AND SELECTED FOOD SOURCES.COX NA; MERCURI AJ.1977; J. FOOD PROTECT.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 40; NO 10; PP. 709-711; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

COMPARISON OF MICRO-ID, A MODIFIED MINITEK SYSTEM, AND CONVENTIONAL METHODS FOR FOUR-HOUR IDENTIFICATION OF ENTEROBACTERIACAE DIRECTLY FROM BLOOD CULTURESWELLSTOOD S.1982; AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; ISSN 0002-9335; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 48; NO 9; PP. 769-773; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

Rapid identification of pathogenic Neisseria species and Branhamella catarrhalisHUGHES, B; PEZZLO, M. T; DE LA MAZA, L. M et al.Journal of clinical microbiology (Print). 1987, Vol 25, Num 11, pp 2223-2224, issn 0095-1137Article

Identification and susceptibility patterns of anaerobic bacteria isolated from clinical specimens during a one-year periodRODLOFF, A. C; GÖRTZ, G; PONNATH, H et al.Infection. 1984, Vol 12, Num 6, pp 395-401, issn 0300-8126Article

Comparative evaluation of five commercial systems for the rapid identification of pathogenic Neisseria speciesPHILIP, A; GARTON, G. C.Journal of clinical microbiology (Print). 1985, Vol 22, Num 1, pp 101-104, issn 0095-1137Article

Fluorescent monoclonal antibody compared with carbohydrate utilization for rapid identification of Neisseria gonorrhoeaeWELCH, W. D; CARTWRIGHT, G.Journal of clinical microbiology (Print). 1988, Vol 26, Num 2, pp 293-296, issn 0095-1137Article