Processing of mammographic films: technical and clinical considerationsTABAR, L; HAUS, A. G.Radiology. 1989, Vol 173, Num 1, pp 65-69, issn 0033-8419, 5 p.Conference Paper

An investigation into the effects of suboptimal viewing conditions in screen-film mammographyROBSON, K. J.British journal of radiology. 2008, Vol 81, Num 963, pp 219-231, issn 0007-1285, 13 p.Article

Digital mammographyPISANO, Etta D; YAFFE, Martin J.Radiology. 2005, Vol 234, Num 2, pp 353-362, issn 0033-8419, 10 p.Article

Digital Mammogram Enhancement Based on ROI Enhancement and Background SuppressionPENS, Renbin; VARSHNEY, Pramod K; HAO CHEN et al.Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering. 2008, pp 69141D.1-69141D.11, issn 0277-786X, isbn 978-0-8194-7098-0Conference Paper

Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia: a study of the mammographic and sonographic featuresCELLIERS, L; WONG, D. D; BOURKE, A et al.Clinical radiology. 2010, Vol 65, Num 2, pp 145-149, issn 0009-9260, 5 p.Article

The effect of Premium View post-processing software on digital mammographic reportingGOLDSTRAW, E. J; CASTELLANO, I; ASHLEY, S et al.British journal of radiology. 2010, Vol 83, Num 986, pp 122-128, issn 0007-1285, 7 p.Article

Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation : Gaze-tracking studyKUNDEL, Harold L; NODINE, Calvin F; CONANT, Emily F et al.Radiology. 2007, Vol 242, Num 2, pp 396-402, issn 0033-8419, 7 p.Article

Mammographic film-processor temperature, development time, and chemistry: effect on dose, contrast, and noiseKIMME-SMITH, C; ROTHSCHILD, P. A; BASSETT, L. W et al.American journal of roentgenology (1976). 1989, Vol 152, Num 1, pp 35-40, issn 0361-803X, 6 p.Article

Proceedings/3rd. Symposium mammographicum, London, September 12-13, 1985British journal of radiology. 1986, Vol 59, Num 702, pp 631-642, issn 0007-1285Conference Proceedings

Mammographic Screening and OverdiagnosisKOPANS, Daniel B; SMITH, Robert A; DUFFY, Stephen W et al.Radiology. 2011, Vol 260, Num 3, pp 616-620, issn 0033-8419, 5 p.Article

Community-based mammography practice: Services, charges, and interpretation methodsHENDRICK, R. Edward; CUTTER, Gary R; ELMORE, Joann G et al.American journal of roentgenology (1976). 2005, Vol 184, Num 2, pp 433-438, issn 0361-803X, 6 p.Article

Physician Workload in MammographySMITH-BINDMAN, Rebecca; MIGLIORETTI, Diana L; ROSENBERG, Robert et al.American journal of roentgenology (1976). 2008, Vol 190, Num 2, pp 526-532, issn 0361-803X, 7 p.Article

A knowledge-based approach to CADx of mammographic massesELTER, Matthias; HAFSSLMEYER, Erik.Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering. 2008, pp 69150L.1-69150L.8, issn 0277-786X, isbn 978-0-8194-7099-7Conference Paper

Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammogramsSKAANE, Per; KSHIRSAGAR, Ashwini; STAPLETON, Sandra et al.American journal of roentgenology (1976). 2007, Vol 188, Num 2, pp 377-384, issn 0361-803X, 8 p.Article

Bias in the medical journals : A commentaryKOPANS, Daniel B.American journal of roentgenology (1976). 2005, Vol 185, Num 1, pp 176-182, issn 0361-803X, 7 p.Article

Current realities of delivering mammography services in the community : Do challenges with staffing and scheduling exist?D'ORSI, Carl; TU, Shin-Ping; ELMORE, Joann G et al.Radiology. 2005, Vol 235, Num 2, pp 391-395, issn 0033-8419, 5 p.Article

Free-response receiver operating characteristic evaluation of lossy JPEG2000 and object-based set partitioning in hierarchical trees compression of digitized mammogramsPENEDO, Monica; SOUTO, Miguel; FAJARDO, Laurie L et al.Radiology. 2005, Vol 237, Num 2, pp 450-457, issn 0033-8419, 8 p.Article

The cost-effectiveness of mammography screening : evidence from a microsimulation model for New Zeland = Analyse coût efficacité de la mammographie : résultats obtenus à partir d'un modèle de microsimulation en Nouvelle ZélandeSZETO, K.L; DEVLIN, N.J.HEALTH POLICY. 1996, Vol 38, Num 2, pp 101-115Article

Suture calcification mimicking recurrence in the irradiasted breast: a potential pitfall in mammographic evaluationDAVIS, S. P; STOMPER, P. C; WEIDNER, N et al.Radiology. 1989, Vol 172, Num 1, pp 247-248, issn 0033-8419, 2 p.Article

Why women resist screening mammography: patient-related barriersRIMER, B. K; KASPER KEINTZ, M; KESSLER, H. B et al.Radiology. 1989, Vol 172, Num 1, pp 243-246, issn 0033-8419, 4 p.Conference Paper

The evolution of mammographyBASSETT, L. W; GOLD, R. H.American journal of roentgenology (1976). 1988, Vol 150, Num 3, pp 493-498, issn 0361-803XArticle

Computer aids to mammographic diagnosisGALE, A. G; ROEBUCK, E. J; RILEY, P et al.British journal of radiology. 1987, Vol 60, Num 717, pp 887-891, issn 0007-1285Article

Programme de dépistage du cancer du sein en France : résultats 2010, évolutions depuis 2006LASTIER, D; ROGEL, A; SALINES, E et al.2013, 26 p., isbn 978-2-11-131148-0Book

Mammography with Synchrotron Radiation: First Clinical Experience with Phase-Detection TechniqueCASTELLI, Edoardo; TONUTTI, Maura; QUAI, Elisa et al.Radiology. 2011, Vol 259, Num 3, pp 684-694, issn 0033-8419, 11 p.Article

Spectrum of Diseases Presenting as Architectural Distortion on Mammography: Multimodality Radiologic Imaging with Pathologic CorrelationSHAHEEN, Rola; SCHIMMELPENNINCK, Catrien A; STODDART, Lanu et al.Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR. 2011, Vol 32, Num 4, pp 351-362, issn 0887-2171, 12 p.Article