INHIBITORY EFFECT OF BINOCULAR RIVALRY SUPPRESSION IS INDEPENDENT OF ORIENTATION.BLAKE R; LEMA SA.1978; VISION RES.; GBR; DA. 1978; VOL. 18; NO 5; PP. 541-544; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

COMPLEXITY OF CONTEXT AND ORIENTATION OF FIGURE IN THE CORRIDOR ILLUSIONFINEMAN MB.1981; PERCEPT. MOT. SKILLS; ISSN 0031-5125; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 53; NO 1; PP. 11-14; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

THE INTERFERENCE OF A BASELINE WITH CHILDREN'S ORIENTATION JUDGEMENT NEED NOT ENTIRELY MASK THEIR CONTEXTUAL RESPONSIVENESSFREEMAN NH; KELHAM SE.1981; Q. J. EXP. PSYCHOL., SECT. A, HUM. EXP. PSYCHOL.; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 33; NO 2; PP. 145-154; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

THE EFFECTS OF RETINAL ECCENTRICITY AND ORIENTATION ON PERCEIVED LENGTHTHOMPSON JG; FOWLER KA.1980; J. GEN. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-1309; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 103; NO 2; PP. 227-232; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

PERCEPTION OF ORIENTATION OF SHORT LINES: ITS DEPENDENCE ON LINE'S LENGHT AND INTENSITYZLATKOVA M; VASSILEV A.1978; ACTA PHYSIOL. PHARMACOL. BULG.; BGR; DA. 1978; VOL. 4; NO 3; PP. 79-84; ABS. RUS; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

HEMISPHERIC ASYMMETRY: THE EFFECT OF ORIENTATION ON SAME DIFFERENT COMPARISONHOCK HS; KRONSEDER C; SISSONS SK et al.1981; NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA; ISSN 0028-3932; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 19; NO 5; PP. 723-727; ABS. FRE/GER; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

LA REPRODUCTION GRAPHIQUE DE TRAJECTOIRES. PROBLEMES POSES PAR LA SYMETRIELURCAT L.1979; REV. PSYCHOL. APPL.; FRA; DA. 1979; VOL. 29; NO 4; PP. 383-404Article

ANISOTROPIES OF PERCEIVED CONTRAST AND DETECTION SPEEDESSOCK EA.1982; VIS RES. (OXF.); ISSN 0042-6989; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 22; NO 9; PP. 1185-1191; BIBL. 24 REF.Article

PREFERENCE FOR LATERAL DIRECTIONAL PROPERTIES: A REPLY TO GORDONFREIMUTH M; WAPNER S.1981; BR. J. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0007-1269; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 72; NO 3; PP. 321-322; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

INHIBITION OF FEATURE EXTRACTION WITH MULTIPLE INSTANCES OF THE TARGET FEATURE IN DIFFERENT ORIENTATIONSCHASTAIN G.1981; PSYCHOL. RES.; ISSN 0340-0727; DEU; DA. 1981; VOL. 43; NO 1; PP. 45-56; BIBL. 1 P.Article

ON HOW ADULTS IDENTIFY THE ORIENTATION OF A SHAPEBRAINE LG; RELYEA L; DAVIDMAN L et al.1981; PERCEPT. PSYCHOPHYS.; ISSN 0031-5117; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 29; NO 2; PP. 138-144; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN UPRIGHT AND ROTATED IMAGESROLDAN CE; PHILIPS WA.1980; Q. J. EXP. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0033-555X; GBR; DA. 1980; VOL. 32; NO 3; PP. 397-412; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

Displacement thresholds for coherent apparent motion in random dot-patternsRAMACHANDRAN, V. S; ANSTIS, S. M.Vision research (Oxford). 1983, Vol 23, Num 12, pp 1719-1724, issn 0042-6989Article

Displacement limits for spatial frequency filtered random-dot cinematograms in apparent motionCHANG, J. J; JULESZ, B.Vision research (Oxford). 1983, Vol 23, Num 12, pp 1379-1385, issn 0042-6989Article

ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY OF MEDIAL TERMINAL NUCLEUS OF ACCESSORY OPTIC SYSTEM IN THE CATGRASSE KL; CYNADER MS.1982; J. NEUROPHYSIOL.; ISSN 0022-3077; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 48; NO 2; PP. 490-504; BIBL. 48 REF.Article

THE ROLE OF MENTAL ROTATION IN LETTER PROCESSING BY CHILDREN AND ADULTSYOUNG JM; PALEF SR; LOGAN GD et al.1980; CAN. J. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0008-4255; CAN; DA. 1980; VOL. 34; NO 3; PP. 265-269; ABS. FRE; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

The recognition and representation of edge blur: evidence for spatial primitives in human visionWATT, R. J; MORGAN, M. J.Vision research (Oxford). 1983, Vol 23, Num 12, pp 1465-1477, issn 0042-6989Article

Bimodal receptive fields of cat retinal ganglion cellsTHIBOS, L. N; LEVICK, W. R.Vision research (Oxford). 1983, Vol 23, Num 12, pp 1561-1572, issn 0042-6989Article

Responses of striatal neurons in the behaving monkey. II: Visual processing in the caudal neostriatumCAAN, W; PERRETT, D. I; ROLLS, E. T et al.Brain research. 1984, Vol 290, Num 1, pp 53-65, issn 0006-8993Article

Long-term learning in Vernier acuity : effects of stimulus orientation, range and of feedbackFAHLE, M; EDELMAN, S.Vision research (Oxford). 1993, Vol 33, Num 3, pp 397-412, issn 0042-6989Article