EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF SOME PROCESS VARIABLES IN PEER TUTORIAL LEARNINGEHLY SW; BRATTON B.1981; PSYCHOL. REC.; ISSN 0033-2933; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 31; NO 4; PP. 537-541; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

L'ENSEIGNEMENT MUTUEL, TECHNIQUE PERSONNALISANTE DANS L'ENSEIGNEMENT PROFESSIONNELANCIAUX ML; COLLARD L; FINN A et al.1981; REV. PSYCHOL. APPL.; ISSN 0035-1709; FRA; DA. 1981; VOL. 31; NO 4; PP. 261-273; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

PEER-TUTORING OUTCOMES AS INFLUENCED BY THE EQUITY AND TYPE OF ROLE ASSIGNMENT.ROSEN S; POWELL ER; SCHUBOT DB et al.1977; J. EDUC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 69; NO 3; PP. 244-252; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

USING PEERS IN DRILL-TYPE INSTRUCTION.HOWELL KW.1978; J. EXPER. BIOL.; GBR; DA. 1978; VOL. 46; NO 3; PP. 52-56; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF STUDENT TEAMS AND PEER TUTORING ON ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND TIME ON-TASKSLAVIN RE.1980; J EX E, J. EXP. EDUC.; ISSN 0022-0973; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 48; NO 4; PP. 252-257; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

PEER VERSUS PROFESSIONAL MODELS FOR STUDY SKILLS TRAININGFREMOUW WJ; FEINDLER EL.1978; J. COUNSELG PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 25; NO 6; PP. 576-580; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

INCREASED PEER-TEACHING WITH GROUP-ORIENTED CONTINGENCIES FOR ARITHMETIC PERFORMANCE IN BEHAVIOR-DISORDERED ADOLESCENTS.MCCARTY T; GRIFFIN S; APOLLONI T et al.1977; J. APPL. BEHAV. ANAL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 10; NO 2; PP. 313Article

STUDENT-EVALUATION OF PEER-GROUP MICROTEACHING AS PREPARATION FOR STUDENT TEACHINGCLIFFORD RT; JORSTAD HL; LANGE DL et al.1977; MOD. LANGUAGE J.; USA; DA. 1977; VOL. 41; NO 5-6; PP. 229-236; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

TEACHING ELEMENTARY SPELLING TO A RETARDED RESIDENT BY ANOTHER RETARDED RESIDENTMULVANEY DE; FITZHUGH LC; WAGNER BR et al.1980; PERCEPT. MOT. SKILLS; ISSN 0031-5125; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 51; NO 2; PP. 523-526; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

PEER TUTORING AMONG ELEMENTARY STUDENTS: EDUCATIONAL BENEFITS TO THE TUTOR.DINEEN JP; CLARK HB; RISLEY TR et al.1977; J. APPL. BEHAV. ANAL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 10; NO 2; PP. 231-238; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

CROSS-AGE TUTORING: EFFECTS ON TULOR'S ATTRIBUTESYOGEU A; RONEN.1982; J. EDUC. RES. (WASH.); ISSN 0022-0671; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 75; NO 5; PP. 261-268; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF ROLE AND ASSIGNMENT RATIONALE ON ATTITUDES FORMED DURING PEER TUTORINGBIERMAN KL; FURMAN W.1981; J. EDUC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-0663; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 73; NO 1; PP. 33-40; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

INTERDEPENDENCE IN THE CLASSROOM: A FIELD STUDY.BLANEY NT; STEPHAN C; ROSENFIELD D et al.1977; J. EDUC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 69; NO 2; PP. 121-128; BIBL. 26 REF.Article

REVERSAL PEER TUTORING EFFECTS OF POWERLESSNESS IN ADOLESCENTSCHANDLER TA.1980; ADOLESCENCE; ISSN 0001-8449; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 15; NO 59; PP. 715-722; BIBL. 2 P.Article

EFFECTS OF VOLUNTARY AND SEMIVOLUNTARY PEER-MONITORING PROGRAMS ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE.BEAMAN AL; DIENER E; FRASER SC et al.1977; J. EDUC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 69; NO 2; PP. 109-114; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

PEER TUTORING WITH OR WITHOUT HOME-BASED REINFORCEMENT, FOR READING REMEDIATIONTROVATO J; BUCHER B.1980; J. APPL. BEHAV. ANAL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 13; NO 1; PP. 129-141; BIBL. 29 REF.Article

LOCUS OF CONTROL AND TUTOR'S INSTRUCTIONAL STYLE AS DETERMINANTS OF CROSS-AGE TUTORING EFFECTIVENESS.MEDWAY FJ; BARON RM.1977; CONTEMPOR. EDUC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 2; NO 3; PP. 298-310; BIBL. 1 P.Article

TWO, THREE, OR FOUR HEADS ARE BETTER THAN ONE: MODIFICATION OF COLLEGE PERFORMANCE BY PEER MONITORING.FRASER SC; DIENER E; BEAMAN AL et al.1977; J. EDUC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 69; NO 2; PP. 101-108; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

The effects of reward on Tutor's behaviors in a cross-age tutoring contextSZYNAL-BROWN, C; MORGAN, R. R.Journal of experimental child psychology (Print). 1983, Vol 36, Num 2, pp 196-208, issn 0022-0965Article

SEX, STATUS, AND LIKING OF TUTOR AND LEARNER AS PREDICTORS OF TUTORIAL OUTCOMES.EHLY SW; LARSEN SC.1977; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 45; NO 1; PP. 335-336; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

THE STRATEGIES AND EFFICACY OF CHILD VERSUS ADULT TEACHERSELLIS S; ROGOFF B.1982; CHILD DEV.; ISSN 0009-3920; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 53; NO 3; PP. 730-735; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

COMPETENCE AND TUTORIAL ROLE AS STATUS VARIABLES AFFECTING PEER-TUTORING OUTCOMES IN PUBLIC SCHOOL SETTINGSROSEN S; POWELL ER; SCHUBOT DV et al.1978; J. EDUC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 70; NO 4; PP. 602-612; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

THE DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALE FOR ASSESSMENT OF TEACHERS' ATTITUDES TOWARD SMALL-GROUP TEACHINGDAROM E; SHARAN S; HERTZ LAZAROWITZ R et al.1978; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEASUR.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 38; NO 4; PP. 1233-1239; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

Long-term outcomes of the ¡VIVA! Peer Tutor Project: use of MedlinePlus by former peer tutors and the adults they taughtOLNEY, Cynthia; HANSEN, Lucille; VICKMAN, Ann et al.Journal of the Medical Library Association. 2011, Vol 99, Num 4, pp 317-320, issn 1536-5050, 4 p.Article

The nature of student interactions during peer tutoring with and without prior training and experienceFUCHS, L. S; FUCHS, D; BENTZ, J et al.American educational research journal. 1994, Vol 31, Num 1, pp 75-103, issn 0002-8312Article