THE EFFECTS OF A SALIENT SELF-SCHEMA ON THE EVALUATION OF PROATTITUDINAL EDITORIALS: TOP-DOWN VERSUS BOTTOM-UP MESSAGE PROCESSINGCACIOPPO JT; PETTY RE; SIDERA JA et al.1982; J. EXP. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-1031; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 18; NO 4; PP. 324-338; BIBL. 2 P.Article

ASPECTS OF PERSUASION IN PSYCHODRAMAELLA MAE SHEARON.1978; GROUP PSYCHOTHERAPY PSYCHODRAMA SOCIOMETRY; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 31; PP. 96-108; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

WRITING AND REVISING PERSUASIVE DOCUMENTS: COGNITIVE DEMANDSGLYNN SM; BRITTON BK; MUTH KD et al.1982; J. EDUC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-0663; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 74; NO 4; PP. 557-567; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

IMPLICATIONS OF PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION RESEARCH FOR THE MODIFICATION OF SELF-STATEMENTSCRAIGHEAD LW; CRAIGHEAD WE.1980; COGN. THER. RES.; ISSN 0147-5916; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 4; NO 2; PP. 117-134; BIBL. 2 P.Article

PREDICTORS OF RESISTANCE TO PERSUASION: PROPENSITY OF PERSUASIVE ATTACK, PRETREATMENT LANGUAGE INTENSITY, AND EXPECTED DELAY OF ATTACK.MILLER MD; BURGOON M.1977; J. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 95; NO 1; PP. 105-110; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

GRAMMATICAL VARIATIONS IN PERSUASION: EFFECTIVENESS OF FOUR FORMS OF REQUEST IN DOOR-TO-DOOR SOLICITATIONS FOR FUNDSCANTOR JR.1979; COMMUNIC. MONOGR.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 46; NO 4; PP. 296-305; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

COMMUNICATION MODALITY AS A DETERMINANT OF MESSAGE PERSUASIVENESS AND MESSAGE COMPREHENSIBILITY.CHAIKEN S; EAGLY AH.1976; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 34; NO 4; PP. 605-614; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

SELF-EFFICACY EXPECTANCY AND OUTCOME EXPECTANCY: THEIR RELATIONSHIP AND THEIR EFFECTS ON BEHAVIORAL INTENTIONSMADDUX JE; SHERER M; ROGERS RW et al.1982; COGN. THER. RES.; ISSN 0147-5916; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 6; NO 2; PP. 207-211; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

CONFORMITY BEHAVIOR AND PERSUASIBILITY: A BIBLIOGRAPHYFURNHAM A.1978; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 47; NO 3 PART. 2; PP. 1281-1282; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

EMPIRICAL TESTS OF THE ABSOLUTE, SLEEPER EFFECT PREDICTED FROM THE DISCOUNTING CUE HYPOTHESIS.GRUDER CL; COOK TD; HENNIGAN KM et al.1978; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 36; NO 10; PP. 1061-1074; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

LES CHEMINS DE LA PERSUASION.KAPFERER JN.1978; PARIS; GAUTHIER-VILLARS; DA. 1978; PP. 1-349; BIBL. DISSEM.; ISBN 2040101853; (SER. REF.)Book

PASCAL VS. DESCARTES: A CLASH OVER RHETORIC IN THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY.JAMIESON KM.1976; COMMUNIC. MONOGR.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 43; NO 1; PP. 44-50; BIBL. DISSEM.Article

AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF A ROLE ENACTMENT MODEL OF PERSUASION.BODAKEN EM.1976; HUM. COMMUNIC. RES.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 2; NO 4; PP. 330-337; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

WHO SPEAKS FOR THE PRESIDENT. PROBLEMS OF CONTROL IN PRESIDENTIAL COMMUNICATIONSEYMOUR URE C.1980; COMMUNICATION; ISSN 0305-4233; GBR; DA. 1980; VOL. 5; NO 2; PP. 267-274; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION ON ACCEPTANCE OF A COURSE ON POPULATION DYNAMICS.JANAK PANDEY; KHAN ME.1976; J. SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 100; NO 2; PP. 319-320; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

THE PSYCHOLOGICAL BURDEN OF PROOF: ON THE EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPEMENT OF RICHARD WHATELY'S THEORY OF PRESUMPTION.SPROULE JM.1976; COMMUNIC. MONOGR.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 43; NO 2; PP. 115-129Article

EFFECTS OF RHETORICAL QUESTIONS ON PERSUASION: A COGNITIVE RESPONSE ANALYSISPETTY RE; CACIOPPO JT; HEESACKER M et al.1981; J. PERS. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-3514; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 40; NO 3; PP. 432-440; BIBL. 28 REF.Article

THE LIMITS OF PERSUASION: ANTI-SMOKING ACTIVITIES IN THE USSRDEBER RB.1981; CAN. J. PUBLIC HEALTH; ISSN 0008-4263; CAN; DA. 1981; VOL. 72; NO 2; PP. 118-126; ABS. FRE; BIBL. 38 REF.Article

EXTREME DISAGREEMENT AND THE EXPRESSION OF ATTITUDINAL FREEDOMSMITH MJ.1979; COMMUNIC. MONOGR.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 46; NO 2; PP. 112-118; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

PERSUASIBILITY OF WOMEN: CONVENTIONAL WISDEM RE-EXAMINEDKEMPE LJ; MALONEY P; DAMBROT FH et al.1978; PSYCHOL. WOMEN QUART.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 3; NO 2; PP. 198-202; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

SEX DIFFERENCES IN INFLUENCEABILITY.EAGLY AH.1978; PSYCHOL. BULL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 85; NO 1; PP. 86-116; BIBL. 6 P. 1/2Article

THE PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION MODEL: A THEORETICAL APPROACH FOR ATTITUDE CHANGE IN SCIENCE EDUCATIONSHRIGHLEY RL.1978; J. RES. SCI. TEACHG; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 15; NO 5; PP. 335-341; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

A PROPOS DE L'ETUDE GENETIQUE DE L'UN DES ASPECTS DE L'INTELLIGENCE SOCIALE: RECHERCHES EXPERIMENTALES SUR L'ARGUMENTATION ET LA PERSUASION CHEZ L'ENFANTBEAUDICHON J; DUCROUX N; LAMALLE J et al.1978; BULL. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0007-4403; FRA; DA. 1978-1979; VOL. 32; NO 340; PP. 577-591; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

COUNTERARGUING AND SELECTIVE EXPOSURE TO PERSUASION.WELLINS R; MCGINNIES E.1977; J. SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 103; NO 1; PP. 115-127; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

SOME CONDITIONS THAT EFFECT ADMISSIONS OF ATTITUDE CHANGE.BRAVER SL; LINDER DE; CORWIN TT et al.1977; J. EXPER. SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 13; NO 6; PP. 565-576; BIBL. 19 REF.Article