TOWARD A MODEL OF TEXT COMPREHENSION AND PRODUCTIONKINTSCH W; VAN DIJK TA.1978; PSYCHOL. REV.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 85; NO 5; PP. 363-394; BIBL. 2 P.Article

PROCEDURAL SEMANTICS.JOHNSON LAIRD PN.1977; COGNITION; NETHERL.; DA. 1977; VOL. 5; NO 3; PP. 189-214; ABS. FR.; BIBL. 2 P.Article

ON THE COMPREHENSION AND PRODUCTION OF PRONOUNSMACKAY DG; FULKERSON DC.1979; J. VERB. LEARNG VERB. BEHAV.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 18; NO 6; PP. 661-673; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

TEACHING NAMING OF COIN VALUES-COMPREHENSION BEFORE PRODUCTION VERSUS PRODUCTION ALONE.MILLER MA; CUVO AJ; BORAKOVE LS et al.1977; J. APPL. BEHAV. ANAL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 10; NO 4; PP. 735-736Article

WORD ORDER IN EARLY TWO AND THREE WORD UTTERANCES: DOES PRODUCTION PRECEDE COMPREHENSION.CHAPMAN RS; MILLER JF.1975; J. SPEECH HEARG RES.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 18; NO 2; PP. 355-371; BIBL. 1 P.Article

AN IMPLEMENTATION OF PHRASE STRUCTURES IN ALGOLHOUSDEN RJW.1972; SOFTWARE-PRACT. EXPER.; G.B.; DA. 1972; VOL. 2; NO 3; PP. 231-240; BIBL. 8 REF.Serial Issue

CONTEXT IN READING AND LISTENING: A COMPARISON OF CHILDREN'S ERRORS IN CLOZE TESTS = LE CONTEXTE DANS LA LECTURE ET L'ECOUTE: UNE COMPARAISON DES ERREURS A DES TESTS DE PHRASE A COMPLETER CHEZ L'ENFANTNEVILLE MH; PUGH AK.1974; BRIT. J. EDUC. PSYCHOL.; G.B.; DA. 1974; VOL. 44; NO 3; PP. 224-232; BIBL. 1P.Article

VERIFYING THE ASSERTIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF LANGUAGESINGER M.1981; J. VERB. LEARN. VERB. BEHAV.; ISSN 0022-5371; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 20; NO 1; PP. 46-60; BIBL. 39 REF.Article

SENTENCE PROCESSING: EVIDENCE AGAINST THE SERIAL, INDEPENDENT STAGE ASSUMPTIONVAZQUEZ CA.1981; J. PSYCHOLINGUIST. RES.; ISSN 0090-6905; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 10; NO 4; PP. 363-374; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

GENERALIZATION AND TRANSFER BETWEEN COMPREHENSION AND PRODUCTION: A COMPARISON OF RETARDED AND NONRETARDED PERSONSCUVO AJ; RIVA MT.1980; J. APPL. BEHAV. ANAL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 13; NO 2; PP. 315-331; BIBL. 2 P.Article

LA PRODUCTION D'OPPOSITIONS TEMPORELLES CHEZ L'ADULTE.PAROT LOCATELLI F.1977; ANNEE PSYCHOL.; FR.; DA. 1977; VOL. 77; NO 1; PP. 137-147; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

MIND YOUR P'S AND Q'S: THE ROLE OF CONTENT AND CONTEXT IN SOME USES OF AND, OR, AND IF.FILLENBAUM S.1977; PSYCHOL. LEARNG MOTIVAT.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 11; PP. 41-100; BIBL. 3 P.Article

COMPREHENSION AND PRODUCTION OF STANDARD AND BLACK ENGLISH BY LOWER-CLASS BLACK CHILDREN.GAY J; TWENEY RD.1976; DEVELOP. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 12; NO 3; PP. 262-268; BIBL. 24 REF.Article

CONTENT AND CONTEXT IN EARLY LEXICAL DEVELOPMENTSNYDER LS; BATES E; BRETHERTON I et al.1981; J. CHILD LANG.; ISSN 0305-0009; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 8; NO 3; PP. 565-582; BIBL. 28 REF.Article

THE EFFECT OF HIERARCHICAL CUES ON THE LEARNING OF CONCEPTS FROM PROSE MATERIALSEGGEN PD; KAUCHAK DP; KIRK S et al.1978; J. EXPER. EDUC.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 46; NO 4; PP. 7-11; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

STRATEGIES DE TRAITEMENT DES PHRASES RELATIVES: QUELQUES CONSIDERATIONS D'ORDRE GENETIQUE.AMY G; VION M.1976; BULL. PSYCHOL.; FR.; DA. 1976; NO SPEC.; PP. 295-303; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

Partitive and pseudopartitive structures in temporal adverbialsCSIRMAZ, Aniko.Linguistic review. 2014, Vol 31, Num 1, pp 1-39, issn 0167-6318, 39 p.Article

CONTEXT EFFECTS IN SENTENCE COMPREHENSION: A REPLY TO DOLL AND LAPINSKIDOOLING DJ; CHRISTIAANSEN RE.1975; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 5; NO 3; PP. 261-262; BIBL. 11REFArticle

SPEECH PRODUCTION: CONTRIBUTION OF SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE.SHATTUCK SR; LACKNER JR.1975; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 40; NO 3; PP. 931-936; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

THE COMPREHENSIBILITY OF PRINTED INSTRUCTIONS AND THE FLOW CHART ALTERNATIVEKAMMANN R.1975; HUM. FACTORS; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 17; NO 2; PP. 183-191; BIBL. 12REFArticle

MEASURING TRANSIENT MEMORY LOAD.WANNER E; SHINER S.1976; J. VERB. LEARNG VERB. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 15; NO 2; PP. 159-167; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

PERCEPTUAL CLOSURE AND CLOZE PERFORMANCE: A REPLICATION WITH OLDER SUBJECTS = LA CLOTURE PERCEPTIVE ET LA PERFORMANCE OBTENUE DANS DES PHRASES A COMPLETER: UNE REPRISE EXPERIMENTALE AVEC DES SUJETS AGESOHNMACHT FW; FLEMING JT.1972; J. GEN. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 87; NO 2; PP. 225-229; BIBL. 8REF.Article

DURATION AS A CUE TO THE PERCEPTION OF A PHRASE BOUNDARYSCOTT DR.1982; J. ACOUST. SOC. AM.; ISSN 0001-4966; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 71; NO 4; PP. 996-1007; BIBL. 46 REF.Article

QUELQUES ASPECTS DE LA COMPREHENSION DU LANGAGE: MEMOIRE SEMANTIQUE ET COMPREHENSION.DUBOIS D.1976; BULL. PSYCHOL.; FR.; DA. 1976; NO SPEC.; PP. 307-313; BIBL. 1 P.Article

Phrases nominales énonciatives et phrases verbalesSTAHL, G.Revue philosophique de la France et de l'étranger. 1991, Num 3, pp 329-334, issn 0035-3833Article