COMPLETE ORDERS FROM INCOMPLETE DATA: INTERACTIVE ORDERING AND TAILORED TESTINGCLIFF N.1975; PSYCHOL. BULL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 82; NO 2; PP. 289-302; BIBL. 16REFArticle

LIKING OF THE FIRST DRUG EXPERIENCE: A COMPARISON OF TEN DRUGS IN OPIATE ADDICTSHAERTZEN CA; HOOKS NT JR; ROSS FE et al.1981; PSYCHOL. REP.; ISSN 0033-2941; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 48; NO 2; PP. 647-668; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

TIME-BASED AND COUNT-BASED MEASUREMENT OF PREFERENCE.BAUM WM.1976; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 26; NO 1; PP. 27-35; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

MATCH MAKING: ASSIGNMENTS BASED ON BILATERAL PREFERENCESGARDENFORS P.1975; BEHAV. SCI.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 20; NO 3; PP. 166-173; BIBL. 10REFArticle

SERIAL POSITION AND AFFECTMATLIN MW.1975; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 5; NO 6; PP. 489-491; BIBL. 6REF.Article

THE EFFECTS OF STIMULUS PREFERENCE ON HABITUATION OF LOOKING BEHAVIOR IN NORMAL AND RETARDED CHILDREN.HYMAN LM; DUFFY K; DICKIE JR et al.1975; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 6; NO 4A; PP. 355-357; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

PREFERENCE FOR FIXED-INTERVAL SCHEDULES: EFFECTS OF UNEQUAL INITIAL LINKS.DAVISON MC.1976; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 25; NO 3; PP. 371-376; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

THE VISUAL PREFERENCES OF CHILDREN. = PREFERENCES VISUELLES DES ENFANTSHUTT C; FORREST B; NEWTON J et al.1976; J. CHILD PSYCHOL. PSYCHIATRY; G.B.; DA. 1976; VOL. 17; NO 1; PP. 63-68; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

CONTRAST EFFECTS IN THE RESPONSE TO ARTLINDAUER MS; DINTRUFF DD.1975; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 40; NO 1; PP. 155-164; BIBL. 20REFArticle

RESEARCH NOTE: RETICLE COLOR PREFERENCE AS A FUNCTION OF LUMINANCE AND BACKGROUNDGROSSMAN JD.1975; HUM. FACTORS; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 17; NO 2; PP. 215-217; BIBL. 4REFArticle

BEHAVIORAL CONTRAST IN RATS WITH DIFFERENT REINFORCERS AND DIFFERENT RESPONSE TOPOGRAPHIES.BENINGER RJ; KENDALL SB.1975; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 24; NO 3; PP. 267-280; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

CONSTRUCTIVE, EXTENSIVE MEASUREMENT OF PREFERENCE TO PREDICT CHOICE BETWEEN SUMS OF OUTCOMESLEVI AM.1974; BEHAV. SCI.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 19; NO 5; PP. 326-335; BIBL. 18REF.Article

ENJOYMENT OF PERSPECTIVE TRANSFORMATIONS INDUCED BY MOVEMENT.NELSON TM.1976; CANAD. J. BEHAV. SCI.; CANADA; DA. 1976; VOL. 8; NO 3; PP. 287-297; ABS. FR.; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

ODOR INTENSITY AND PLEASANTNESS FOR A DIVERSE SET OF ODORANTS.MOSKOWITZ HR; DRAVNIEKS A; KLARMAN LA et al.1976; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 19; NO 2; PP. 122-128; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

THE PREFERENCE-FOR-SIGNALED-SHOCK PHENOMENON. FIFTY DAYS WITH SCRAMBLED SHOCK IN THE SHUTTLEBOX.BIEDERMAN GB; FUREDY JJ.1976; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 7; NO 2; PP. 129-132; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

CHANGES IN FIRST NAME POPULARITY ACROSS GRADESBUSSE TV; HELFRICH J.1975; J. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 89; NO 2; PP. 281-283; BIBL. 5REFArticle

CHOICE AND SELF-CONTROL IN CHILDREN: A TEST OF RACHLIN'S MODEL = CHOIX ET AUTO-CONTROLE CHEZ LES ENFANTS: UN TEST DU MODELE DE RACHLINBURNS DJ; POWERS RB.1975; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 5; NO 2; PP. 156-158; BIBL. 3REFArticle

RELATIVE AVERSIVENESS OF SIGNALED VS. UNSIGNALED AVOIDABLE AND ESCAPABLE SHOCK SITUATIONS IN HUMANS = AVERSION RELATIVE DES SITUATIONS D'EVITEMENT ET D'ECHAPPEMENT DE CHOCS SIGNALES ET NON SIGNALES CHEZ L'HOMMEBADIA P; CULBERTSON SA; HARSH J et al.1974; J. COMP. PHYSIOL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 87; NO 2; PP. 338-346; BIBL. 11REF.Article

SUCCESSIVE REVERSALS OF A DISCRIMINATED PREFERENCE FOR SIGNALED TAILSHOCKMILLER RR; DANIEL D; BERK AM et al.1974; ANIMAL LEARNG BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 2; NO 4; PP. 271-274; BIBL. 15REF.Article

JOINT INDEPENDENT RANDOM UTILITY MODELS WHERE ONE OF THE CHOICE STRUCTURES SATISFIES THE STRICT UTILITY MODELMARLEY AAJ.1981; J. MATH. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-2496; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 23; NO 3; PP. 257-272; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

CHOICE OF NON REINFORCEMENT FOLLOWING FORCED ALTERATION.HOLDING DH; BIRKIMER JC; DANIELS KR et al.1975; BRIT. J. PSYCHOL.; G.B.; DA. 1975; VOL. 66; NO 4; PP. 443-447; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

COLLECTION PREFERENCES OF CHILDREN.WALLS RT; MOXLEY RA JR; GULKUS SP et al.1975; CHILD DEVELOP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 46; NO 3; PP. 783-785; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

PSYCHOPHYSICAL PREFERENCE FOR HARMONIZED MUSICAL PASSAGES IN THE JUST AND EQUAL TEMPERED SYSTEMSO'KEEFFE V.1975; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 40; NO 1; PP. 192-194; BIBL. 7REFArticle

THE CORNEAL REFLECTION TECHNIQUE AND THE VISUAL PREFERENCE METHOD: SOURCES OF ERROR.SLATER AM; FINDLAY JM.1975; J. EXPER. CHILD PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 20; NO 2; PP. 240-247; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

THE DEVELOPMENT AND MODIFICATION OF OBJECTS PREFERENCES IN DOMESTIC WHITE LEGHORN CHICKS.EINSIEDEL AA JR.1975; DEVELOP. PSYCHOBIOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 8; NO 6; PP. 533-540; BIBL. 15 REF.Article