FEEDBACK AND TASK PREDICTABILITY AS DETERMINANTS OF PERFORMANCE IN MULTIPLE CUE PROBABILITY LEARNING TASKS.SCHMITT N; COYLE BW; KING L et al.1976; ORGANIZ. BEHAV. HUM. PERFORM.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 16; NO 2; PP. 388-402; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

CONFIGURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING IN TWO-CUE PROBABILITY LEARNINGEDGELL SE.1978; ORGANIZ. BEHAV. HUM. PERFORM.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 22; NO 3; PP. 404-416; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

TYPES OF TASK INFORMATION FEEDBACK IN MULTIPLE-CUE PROBABILITY LEARNING.SCHMITT N; COYLE BW; SAARI BB et al.1977; ORGANIZ. BEHAV. HUM. PERFORM.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 18; NO 2; PP. 316-328; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

NOTE ON HYPOTHESIS TESTING IN PROBABILISTIC INFERENCE TASKSBREHMER B.1979; SCAND. J. PSYCHOL.; SWE; DA. 1979; VOL. 20; NO 3; PP. 155-158; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

CUE MEASUREMENT SCALE AND FUNCTIONAL HYPOTHESIS TESTING IN CUE PROBABILITY LEARNINGSNIEZEK JA; NAYLOR JC.1978; ORGANIZ. BEHAV. HUM. PERFORM.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 22; NO 3; PP. 366-374; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

LE COMPORTEMENT D'UTILISATION D'INDICES CHEZ LE JEUNE ENFANT DANS L'APPRENTISSAGE DE PROBABILITES A INDICES MULTIPLESDOI M.1977; JAP. J. PSYCHOL.; JAP.; DA. 1977; VOL. 48; NO 1; PP. 14-24; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

EFFECT OF CUE VALIDITY ON LEARNING OF COMPLEX RULES IN PROBABILISTIC INFERENCE TASKSBREHMER B.1980; ACTA PHYSIOL.; NLD; DA. 1980; VOL. 44; NO 2; PP. 201-210; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF STIMULUS PROBABILITY ON ENCODING BY MENTALLY RETARTED AND NONRETARDED PERSONSMAISTO AA; SIPE S.1980; AMER. J. MENTAL DEFIC.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 84; NO 6; PP. 577-581; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

MCPL; A PROGRAM FOR DESCRIBING PERFORMANCE IN MULTIPLE-CUE PROBABILITY LEARNINGDICKINSON TL; COOKSEY RW.1981; BEHAV. RES. METHODS INSTRUM.; ISSN 0005-7878; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 13; NO 1; PP. 60; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

REVERSAL OF ORDER OF INFORMATION IN A MULTIPLE-CUE PROBABILITY LEARNING TASKHOLZWORTH RJ.1980; J. GEN. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 102; NO 2; PP. 211-223; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

FEEDBACK EFFECTS IN A METRIC MULTIPLE-CUE PROBABILITY LEARNING TASK.HOLZWORTH RJ; DOHERTY ME.1976; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 8; NO 1; PP. 1-3; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

LEARNING CONDITIONAL FREQUENCES IN A PROBABILITY LEARNING TASKPITZ GF; ENGLERT JA; HAXBY K et al.1981; ACTA PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0001-6918; NLD; DA. 1981; VOL. 47; NO 3; PP. 229-243; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

PROBABILITY LEARNING IN CHILDREN AS A FUNCTION OF AGE AND REINFORCEMENT PROCEDUREWINEFIELD AH.1980; J. GENET. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-1325; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 137; NO 1; PP. 79-90; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

VISUAL PROBABILITY LEARNING OF INSTITUTIONALIZED PROFOUNDLY RETARDED ADULT MALESHARRIS LP.1980; AMER. J. MENTAL DEFIC.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 84; NO 4; PP. 415-418; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF A TASK-IRRELEVANT STIMULUS DIMENSION ON ASYMPTOTIC RESPONSE PROBABILITY IN CHILDREN.VOGELMANN S; ULLMANN LP.1977; BULL. PSYCHOM. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 10; NO 2; PP. 111-114; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

LONG-TERM FEEDBACK AND DIFFERENTIAL FEEDBACK EFFECTS IN NONMETRIC MULTIPLE-CUE PROBABILITY LEARNING.CASTELLAN NJ JR; SWAINE M.1977; BEHAV. SCI.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 22; NO 2; PP. 116-128; BIBL. 1 P.Article

SOME FUNCTIONS OF MEMORY IN PROBABILITY LEARNING AND CHOICE BEHAVIOR.ESTES WK.1976; PSYCHOL. LEARNG MOTIVAT.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 10; PP. 1-45; BIBL. 1 P.Article

THE INFLUENCE OF FORMAL SUBSTANTIVE AND CONTEXTUAL TASK PROPERTIES ON THE RELATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF DIFFERENT FORMS OF FEEDBACK IN MULTIPLE-CUE PROBABILITY LEARNING TASKSADELMAN L.1981; ORGAN. BEHAV. HUM. PERFORM.; ISSN 0030-5073; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 27; NO 3; PP. 423-442; BIBL. 2 P.Article

EFFECTS OF INFORMATION-PRESENTATION MODE AND TASK COMPLEXITY ON THE LEARNING OF PROBABILISTIC INFERENCE TASKSHAGAFORS R; BREHMER B.1980; SCAND. J. PSYCHOL.; SWE; DA. 1980; VOL. 21; NO 2; PP. 109-113; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

HIGHER ORDER CONFIGURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING IN NONMETRIC MULTIPLECUE PROBABILITY LEARNINGEDGELL SE.1980; ORGANIZ. BEHAV. HUM. PERFORM.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 25; NO 1; PP. 1-14; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

LEARNING A TWO-USE INFERENCE TASK WHEN ONE OF THE USE-CRITERION RELATIONS IS KNOWNLINDBERG LA; BREHMER B.1980; SCAND. J. PSYCHOL.; SWE; DA. 1980; VOL. 21; NO 2; PP. 115-118; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

LENGTH OF THE POSTFEEDBACK INTERVAL AND LEARNING OF PROBABILISTIC INFERENCE TASKSBREHMER B; KUYLENSTIERNA J.1979; SCAND. J. PSYCHOL.; SWE; DA. 1979; VOL. 20; NO 3; PP. 151-154; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

TRANSFER IN SINGLE-CUE PROBABILITY LEARNING.LINDBERG LA; BREHMER B.1976; ORGANIZ. BEHAV. HUM. PERFORM.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 16; NO 1; PP. 177-192; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF INFORMATION PRESENTATION MODE AND BEARNING PARADIAM ON THE LEARNING OF PROBABILISTIC INFERENCE TASKS UNDER DIFFERENT LEVELS OF MEMORY STRAINHAGAFORS R; BREHMER B.1980; SCAND. J. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0036-5564; SWE; DA. 1980; VOL. 21; NO 4; PP. 249-255; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

LEARNING COMPLEX RULES IN PROBALISTIC INFERENCE TASKS.BREHMER B.1976; SCAND. J. PSYCHOL.; SWED.; DA. 1976; VOL. 17; NO 4; PP. 309-312; BIBL. 5 REF.Article