SPEECH PRODUCTION: CONTRIBUTION OF SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE.SHATTUCK SR; LACKNER JR.1975; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 40; NO 3; PP. 931-936; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

NECESSITY AND CONTINGENCY IN REASONING.VAN DUYNE PC.1976; ACTA PSYCHOL.; PAYS-BAS; DA. 1976; VOL. 40; NO 2; PP. 85-101; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

LA CREATIVITE LEXICALE.GUILBERT L.1975; PARIS; LAROUSSE; DA. 1975; PP. 1-285; BIBL. 4 P. 1/2; ISBN 2030703400; (LANG. ET LANGAGE)Book

ETUDE DES STRATEGIES DE PRODUCTION D'ENONCES A PARTIR D'UNE SUITE DE LEXEMESSEGUI J; CHAUVAUT N.1974; ANNEE PSYCHOL.; FR.; DA. 1974; VOL. 74; NO 2; PP. 455-472; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 9REF.Article

A LINEAR-TIME MODEL OF LANGUAGE PRODUCTION: SOME PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONSMCDONALD DD.1980; ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS. ANNUAL MEETING. 18. PARASESSION ON TOPICS IN INTERACTIVE DISCOURSE/1980-06-19/PHILADELPHIA PA; USA; S.L.: ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; DA. 1980; PP. 55-57; BIBL. 9 REF.Conference Paper

TOWARD A MODEL OF TEXT COMPREHENSION AND PRODUCTIONKINTSCH W; VAN DIJK TA.1978; PSYCHOL. REV.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 85; NO 5; PP. 363-394; BIBL. 2 P.Article

PROCEDURAL SEMANTICS.JOHNSON LAIRD PN.1977; COGNITION; NETHERL.; DA. 1977; VOL. 5; NO 3; PP. 189-214; ABS. FR.; BIBL. 2 P.Article

DEVELOPMENT OF THE VOICING CONTRAST: A COMPARISON OF VOICE ONSET TIME IN STOP PERCEPTION AND PRODUCTION.ZLATIN MA; KOENIGSKNECHT RA.1976; J. SPEECH HEARG RES.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 19; NO 1; PP. 93-111; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

LES MOYENS LINGUISTIQUES AU SERVICE DE L'EXPRESSIVITE.FOURQUET J.1976; J. PSYCHOL. NORM. PATHOL.; FR.; DA. 1976; VOL. 73; NO 3-4; PP. 261-271Article

SPEECH PRODUCTION: EVIDENCE FOR SYNTACTICALLY AND PHONOLOGICALLY DETERMINED UNITS = PRODUCTION DU DISCOURS: EVIDENCE POUR DES UNITES DETERMINEES SYNTACTIQUEMENT ET PHONOLOGIQUEMENTLACKNER JR; LEVINE KB.1975; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 17; NO 1; PP. 107-113; BIBL. 21REFArticle

VOICE ONSET TIME, FRICATION, AND ASPIRATION IN WORD-INITIAL CONSONANT CLUSTERS.KLATT DH.1975; J. SPEETH HEARG RES.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 18; NO 4; PP. 686-706; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

PREFERENCES POUR DIFFERENTES CONSTRUCTIONS SYNTAXIQUES EXPRIMANT LA SUCCESSION TEMPORELLE.VANDENPLAS HOLPER C.1975; REV. PSYCHOL. SCI. EDUC.; BELG.; DA. 1975; VOL. 10; NO 1; PP. 49-70; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

HESITATION AND SEMANTIC PLANNING IN SPEECHBUTTERWORTH B.1975; J. PSYCHOLINGUIST. RES.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 4; NO 1; PP. 75-87; BIBL. 17REF.Article

LES CHOIX LEXICAUX DANS L'ELABORATION DE L'ENONCE: QUELQUES ORIENTATIONS DE RECHERCHE.COSTERMANS J.1975; REV. PSYCHOL. SCI. EDUC.; BELG.; DA. 1975; VOL. 10; NO 1; PP. 25-48; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

THE PERCEPTION OF STOP CONSONANT VOICING BY SPANISH-ENGLISH BILINGUALS.WILLIAMS L.1977; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 21; NO 4; PP. 289-297; BIBL. 30 REF.Article

THEMATIZATION AND INTONATION IN THE ORGANIZATION OF SENTENCES.GOODENOUGH TREPAGNIER C; SMITH F.1977; LANGUAGE AND SPEECH; G.B.; DA. 1977; VOL. 20; NO 2; PP. 99-107; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

OUTPUT EDITING FOR LEXICAL STATUS IN ARTIFICIALLY ELICITED SLIPS ON THE TONGUE.BAARS BJ; MOTLEY MT; MACKAY DG et al.1975; J. VERB. LEARNG VERB. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 14; NO 4; PP. 382-391; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

THE IMPORTANCE OF INPUT DATA IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION STUDIES.WAGNER GOUGH J; HATCH E.1975; LANGUAGE LEARNG; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 25; NO 2; PP. 297-308; BIBL. 1 P.Article

ARTICULATORY INCONSISTENCIES IN THE SPEECH OF NORMAL CHILDREN.GALLAGHER TM; SHRINER TH.1975; J. SPEECH HEARG RES.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 18; NO 1; PP. 168-175; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF NONLINGUISTIC KNOWLEDGE ON LANGUAGE PRODUCTIONHARRIS RJ.1974; J. PSYCHOLINGUIST. RES.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 3; NO 4; PP. 303-310; BIBL. 19REF.Article

FEATURE PROCESSING IN THE PERCEPTION AND PRODUCTION OF SPEECHCOOPER WE; LAURITSEN MR.1974; NATURE; G.B.; DA. 1974; VOL. 252; NO 5479; PP. 121-123; BIBL. 22REF.Article

LE PROCES D'ENONCIATION DANS LE TEXTE LIBRE: ESSAI D'ELABORATION D'UNE GRILLE DE LECTURE TEXTUELLECLANCHE P.1974; BULL. PSYCHOL.; FR.; DA. 1974; VOL. 28; NO 318; PP. 811-820; BIBL. 22REFArticle

ON THE COMPREHENSION AND PRODUCTION OF PRONOUNSMACKAY DG; FULKERSON DC.1979; J. VERB. LEARNG VERB. BEHAV.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 18; NO 6; PP. 661-673; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

TEACHING NAMING OF COIN VALUES-COMPREHENSION BEFORE PRODUCTION VERSUS PRODUCTION ALONE.MILLER MA; CUVO AJ; BORAKOVE LS et al.1977; J. APPL. BEHAV. ANAL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 10; NO 4; PP. 735-736Article

CHOICE OF DEFINITE VERSUS INDEFINITE ARTICLE AS A FUNCTION OF SENTENCE VOICE AND REVERSIBILITY.WRIGHT P; GLUCKSBERG S.1976; QUART. J. EXPER. PSYCHOL.; G.B.; DA. 1976; VOL. 28; NO 4; PP. 561-570; BIBL. 18 REF.Article