Pascal and Francis Bibliographic Databases

Help

Search results

Your search

kw.\*:("PUNITION")

Filter

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Document Type [dt]

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Publication Year[py]

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Discipline (document) [di]

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Language

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Author Country

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Origin

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Results 1 to 25 of 1685

  • Page / 68

Export

Selection :

  • and

PUNISHMENT: ITS SEVERITY AND CERTAINTY = PUNITION: SA SEVERITE ET SA CERTITUDEBAILEY WC; SMITH RW.1972; J. CRIM. LAW CRIMINOL. POLICE SCI.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 63; NO 4; PP. 530-539; BIBL. 57 REF.Article

PUNISHMENT OF HUMAN BEHAVIOR = PUNITION DE COMPORTEMENT HUMAINJOHNSTON JM.1972; AMER. PSYCHOLOGIST; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 27; NO 11; PP. 1033-1054; BIBL. 2P.1/2Article

SANCTIONS AND THE AGED WOMANROWE AR.1983; PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS; ISSN 0031-5125; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 56; NO 2; PP. 427-430; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

PUNTUALIZACIONES EN TORNO AL CASTIGO: UNA VISION OPERATIVE = VISION OPERANTE A PROPOS DE LA PUNITIONALONSO M.1982; REV. PSICOL. GEN. APL.; ISSN 0373-2002; ESP; DA. 1982; VOL. 37; NO 1; PP. 173-181; BIBL. 2 P.Article

TWO-CHOICE DISCRIMINATION LEARNING IN CHILDREN AS A FUNCTION OF PUNISHMENT MODALITY AND REINFORCEMENT COMBINATION = APPRENTISSAGE DE DISCRIMINATION A 2CHOIX CHEZ LES ENFANTS EN FONCTION DE LA MODALITE DE PUNITION ET DE LA COMBINAISON DE RENFORCEMENTRATLIFF RG.1972; J. EXPER. CHILD PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 14; NO 3; PP. 365-371; BIBL. 10REF.Article

A NEURAL THEORY OF PUNISHMENT AND AVOIDANCE, II: QUANTITATIVE THEORY = UNE THEORIE NEUROLOGIQUE DE LA PUNITION ET DE L'EVITEMENT II+ THEORIE QUANTITATIVEGROSSBERG S.1972; MATH. BIOSCI.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 15; NO 3-4; PP. 253-285; BIBL. 3P.Article

CRIMINAL SANCTIONS FOR CORPORATE ILLEGALITY.YODER SA.1978; J. CRIM. LAW CRIMINOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 69; NO 1; PP. 40-58; BIBL. 142 REF.Article

VIEWER'S MORAL SANCTION OF RETRIBUTION IN THE APPRECIATION OF DRAMATIC PRESENTATIONS.ZILLMANN D; BRYANT J.1975; J. EXPER. SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 11; NO 6; PP. 572-582; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

A GUTTMAN SCALE OF CHILDREN'S COERCIVE BEHAVIORSPATTERSON GR; DAWES RM.1975; J. CONSULTG CLIN. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 43; NO 4; PP. 594; BIBL. 5REF.Article

THE USE OF PUNISHMENT AS A TREATMENT MODALITY: A CASE REPORT = L'UTILISATION DE LA PUNITION COMME MODE DE TRAITEMENT. RAPPORT D'UN CASBRANDSMA JM; STEIN LI.1973; J. NERV. MENTAL DIS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 156; NO 1; PP. 30-37; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

A Compatibilist-Friendly Rejection of PrepunishmentROBINSON, Michael.Philosophia (Ramat Gan). 2010, Vol 38, Num 3, pp 589-594, issn 0048-3893, 6 p.Article

A GAME THEORETIC ANALYSIS OF THE COMPONENTS OF PUNISHMENTGRAY LN; MIRANNE AC III; WARD DA et al.1982; SOC. PSYCHOL. Q.; ISSN 0190-2725; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 45; NO 4; PP. 206-212; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

ATTITUDES TOWARD PUNISHMENT IN RELATION TO BELIEFS IN FREE WILL AND DETERMINISMVINEY W; WALDMAN DA; BARCHILON J et al.1982; HUMAN RELATIONS (NEW YORK); ISSN 0018-7267; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 35; NO 11; PP. 939-949; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

GENERALITY AND SIDE EFFECTS OF OVER CORRECTIONEPSTEIN LH; DOKE LA; SAJWAJ TE et al.1974; J. APPL. BEHAV. ANAL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 7; NO 3; PP. 385-390; BIBL. 7REF.Article

EXTRAVERSION AND ATTITUDE TOWARDS CAPITAL PUNISHMENTMCMELVIE SJ; DAOUSSIS L.1982; PERS. INDIVID. DIFFER.; ISSN 0191-8869; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 3; NO 3; PP. 341-342; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT POLICE ROLES ON ATTITUDES AND VALUES.CARLSON HM; SUTTON MS.1975; J. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 91; NO 1; PP. 57-64; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

LES SIGNIFICATIONS DE LA SANCTION A L'ECOLE PAR L'ETUDE DE SA REPRESENTATION CHEZ LES ENSEIGNANTSMEYER R.1974; BULL. PSYCHOL.; FR.; DA. 1974; VOL. 28; NO 314; PP. 315-320; BIBL. 26REFArticle

PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS AND EVALUATION OF CHILDREN'S TRANSGRESSIONS = L'ATTIRANCE PHYSIQUE ET L'EVALUATION DES DESOBEISSANCES CHEZ LES ENFANTSDION KK.1972; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 24; NO 2; PP. 207-213; BIBL. 6REF.Article

LA RECIDIVE DANS L'EVALUATION DES MESURES PENALESLANDREVILLE P.1982; DEVIANCE ET SOCIETE; ISSN 0378-7931; CHE; DA. 1982; VOL. 6; NO 4; PP. 375-388; BIBL. 29 REF.Article

ANESSING THE DETERRENCE DOCTRINE: A CHALLENGE FOR THE SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCEGIBBS SP.1979; AMER. BEHAV. SCIENTIST; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 22; NO 6; PP. 653-677; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF ALCOHOL ON PUNISHED AND UNPUNISHED RESPONDING OF SQUIRREL MONKEYSGLOWA JR; BARRETT JE.1976; PHARMACOL. BIOCHEM. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 4; NO 2; PP. 169-173; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

CHILDREN'S EVALUATIONS OF TEMPORALLY DISTANT OUTCOMESNISAN M.1975; J. GENET. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 126; NO 1; PP. 53-60; BIBL. 8REF.Article

PHYSICAL AGGRESSION AS A FUNCTION OF OBJECTIVE SELF-AWARENESS AND ATTITUDES TOWARD PUNISHMENT.CARVER CS.1975; J. EXPER. SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 11; NO 6; PP. 510-519; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

PUNISHMENT AND ALTERNATIVE RESPONSE TRAINING AS DETERMINANTS OF RESPONSE INHIBITION IN CHILDRENPERRY DG; PARKE RD.1975; GENET. PSYCHOL. MONOGR.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 91; NO 2; PP. 257-279; BIBL. 12REFArticle

CONTIGUOUS WITHDRAWAL CONDITIONING A MODEL FOR PUNISHMENTHARAWAY MM; MAPLES EG.1974; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 35; NO 1; PP. 223-226; BIBL. 6REF.Article

  • Page / 68