PUNISHMENT OF HUMAN BEHAVIOR = PUNITION DE COMPORTEMENT HUMAINJOHNSTON JM.1972; AMER. PSYCHOLOGIST; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 27; NO 11; PP. 1033-1054; BIBL. 2P.1/2Article

A NEURAL THEORY OF PUNISHMENT AND AVOIDANCE, II: QUANTITATIVE THEORY = UNE THEORIE NEUROLOGIQUE DE LA PUNITION ET DE L'EVITEMENT II+ THEORIE QUANTITATIVEGROSSBERG S.1972; MATH. BIOSCI.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 15; NO 3-4; PP. 253-285; BIBL. 3P.Article

CRIMINAL SANCTIONS FOR CORPORATE ILLEGALITY.YODER SA.1978; J. CRIM. LAW CRIMINOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 69; NO 1; PP. 40-58; BIBL. 142 REF.Article

VIEWER'S MORAL SANCTION OF RETRIBUTION IN THE APPRECIATION OF DRAMATIC PRESENTATIONS.ZILLMANN D; BRYANT J.1975; J. EXPER. SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 11; NO 6; PP. 572-582; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

A GUTTMAN SCALE OF CHILDREN'S COERCIVE BEHAVIORSPATTERSON GR; DAWES RM.1975; J. CONSULTG CLIN. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 43; NO 4; PP. 594; BIBL. 5REF.Article

THE USE OF PUNISHMENT AS A TREATMENT MODALITY: A CASE REPORT = L'UTILISATION DE LA PUNITION COMME MODE DE TRAITEMENT. RAPPORT D'UN CASBRANDSMA JM; STEIN LI.1973; J. NERV. MENTAL DIS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 156; NO 1; PP. 30-37; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

EXTRAVERSION AND ATTITUDE TOWARDS CAPITAL PUNISHMENTMCMELVIE SJ; DAOUSSIS L.1982; PERS. INDIVID. DIFFER.; ISSN 0191-8869; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 3; NO 3; PP. 341-342; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT POLICE ROLES ON ATTITUDES AND VALUES.CARLSON HM; SUTTON MS.1975; J. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 91; NO 1; PP. 57-64; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

LES SIGNIFICATIONS DE LA SANCTION A L'ECOLE PAR L'ETUDE DE SA REPRESENTATION CHEZ LES ENSEIGNANTSMEYER R.1974; BULL. PSYCHOL.; FR.; DA. 1974; VOL. 28; NO 314; PP. 315-320; BIBL. 26REFArticle

PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS AND EVALUATION OF CHILDREN'S TRANSGRESSIONS = L'ATTIRANCE PHYSIQUE ET L'EVALUATION DES DESOBEISSANCES CHEZ LES ENFANTSDION KK.1972; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 24; NO 2; PP. 207-213; BIBL. 6REF.Article

LA RECIDIVE DANS L'EVALUATION DES MESURES PENALESLANDREVILLE P.1982; DEVIANCE ET SOCIETE; ISSN 0378-7931; CHE; DA. 1982; VOL. 6; NO 4; PP. 375-388; BIBL. 29 REF.Article

ANESSING THE DETERRENCE DOCTRINE: A CHALLENGE FOR THE SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCEGIBBS SP.1979; AMER. BEHAV. SCIENTIST; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 22; NO 6; PP. 653-677; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF ALCOHOL ON PUNISHED AND UNPUNISHED RESPONDING OF SQUIRREL MONKEYSGLOWA JR; BARRETT JE.1976; PHARMACOL. BIOCHEM. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 4; NO 2; PP. 169-173; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

CHILDREN'S EVALUATIONS OF TEMPORALLY DISTANT OUTCOMESNISAN M.1975; J. GENET. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 126; NO 1; PP. 53-60; BIBL. 8REF.Article

PHYSICAL AGGRESSION AS A FUNCTION OF OBJECTIVE SELF-AWARENESS AND ATTITUDES TOWARD PUNISHMENT.CARVER CS.1975; J. EXPER. SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 11; NO 6; PP. 510-519; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

PUNISHMENT AND ALTERNATIVE RESPONSE TRAINING AS DETERMINANTS OF RESPONSE INHIBITION IN CHILDRENPERRY DG; PARKE RD.1975; GENET. PSYCHOL. MONOGR.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 91; NO 2; PP. 257-279; BIBL. 12REFArticle

CONTIGUOUS WITHDRAWAL CONDITIONING A MODEL FOR PUNISHMENTHARAWAY MM; MAPLES EG.1974; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 35; NO 1; PP. 223-226; BIBL. 6REF.Article

Current uses of corporal punishment in American public schoolsROSE, T. L.Journal of educational psychology. 1984, Vol 76, Num 3, pp 427-441, issn 0022-0663Article

FURTHER THOUGHTS ON PUNISHMENT IN ORGANIZATIONSSIMS HP JR.1980; ACAD. MANAG. REV.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 5; NO 1; PP. 133-138; BIBL. 2 P.Article

VICARIOUS PUNISHMENT: AN INVESTIGATION OF TIMING. = PUNITION VICARIANTE: UNE ETUDE DU TEMPSDI GIUSEPPE R.1975; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 36; NO 3; PP. 819-824; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

ETUDE DE L'ACTIVITE DES SUBSTANCES PSYCHOTROPES SUR LE COMPORTEMENT DE PUNITION DU PORC.DANTZER R.1975; J. PHARMACOL.; FR.; DA. 1975; VOL. 6; NO 3; PP. 323-340; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

EFFECTS OF TRAIT GUILT ON IMPRESSIONS OF CHARACTER AND PRESCRIPTIONS OF PUNISHMENT AND GUILTHEYING RH; MUNZ DC.1974; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 39; NO 1 PART. 2; PP. 371-376; BIBL. 7REF.Article

IN DEFENSE OF CORPORAL PUNISHMENTKILLORY JF.1974; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 35; NO 1 PART. 2; PP. 575-581; BIBL. 6REF.Article

THE EFFECTS OF ADULT MODELS AND DESCRIBED ALTERNATIVES ON CHILDREN'S CHOICE OF BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUESGELFAND DM; HARTMANN DP; LAMB AK et al.1974; CHILD DEVELOP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 45; NO 3; PP. 585-593; BIBL. 19REF.Article

USING GROUP CONTINGENCIES WITH PUNISHMENT AND POSITIVE REINFORCEMENT TO MODIFY AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIORS IN A HEAD START CLASSROOMBROWN D; RESCHLY D; SABERS D et al.1974; PSYCHOL. REC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 24; NO 2; PP. 491-496; BIBL. 15REF.Article