kw.\*:("Pitch(acoustics)")
Results 1 to 25 of 1213
Selection :
Prosodic predictors of upcoming positive or negative content in spoken messagesSWERTS, Marc; HIRSCHBERG, Julia.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2010, Vol 128, Num 3, pp 1337-1345, issn 0001-4966, 9 p.Article
On the binding of successive sounds: Perceiving shifts in nonperceived pitchesDEMANY, Laurent; RAMOS, Christophe.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2005, Vol 117, Num 2, pp 833-841, issn 0001-4966, 9 p.Article
A nonmusical paradigm for identifying absolute pitch possessorsROSS, David A; OLSON, Ingrid R; MARKS, Lawrence E et al.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2004, Vol 116, Num 3, pp 1793-1799, issn 0001-4966, 7 p.Article
Prosodic evaluation of accent distributions in spoken news bulletins of Flemish newsreadersSWERTS, Marc; MARSI, Erwin.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2012, Vol 132, Num 4, pp 2616-2624, issn 0001-4966, 9 p., 1Article
Separability of prosodic phrase boundary and phonemic informationaNAKAI, Satsuki; TURK, Alice E.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2011, Vol 129, Num 2, pp 966-976, issn 0001-4966, 11 p.Article
Developmental changes in the perception of pitch contour : Distinguishing up from downSTALINSKI, Stephanie M; SCHELLENBERG, E. Glenn; TREHUB, Sandra E et al.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2008, Vol 124, Num 3, pp 1759-1763, issn 0001-4966, 5 p., 1Article
Dominance region for pitch : Effects of duration and dichotic presentationGOCKEL, Hedwig; CARLYON, Robert P; PLACK, Christopher J et al.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2005, Vol 117, Num 3, pp 1326-1336, issn 0001-4966, 11 p., 1Article
Comparative performance evaluation of different pitch estimation methods for noisy speechPALIWAL, K. K.Acoustics letters. 1983, Vol 6, Num 11, pp 164-166, issn 0140-1599Article
Pitch vulnerability in sensorineural hearing impairmentLARKIN, W. D.Audiology. 1983, Vol 22, Num 5, pp 480-493, issn 0020-6091Article
Tinnitus pitch: a comparison of three measurement methodsTYLER, R. S; CONRAD-ARMES, D.British journal of audiology. 1983, Vol 17, Num 2, pp 101-107, issn 0300-5364Article
Prosodic peak estimation under segmental perturbationsKOCHANSKI, Greg.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2010, Vol 127, Num 2, pp 862-873, issn 0001-4966, 12 p.Article
A note about insensitivity to pitch-change directionMATHIAS, Samuel R; BAILEY, Peter J; SEMAL, Catherine et al.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2011, Vol 130, Num 4, issn 0001-4966, EL129-EL134, 1Article
Can dichotic pitches form two streams?AKEROYD, Michael A; CARLYON, Robert P; DEEKS, John M et al.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2005, Vol 118, Num 2, pp 977-981, issn 0001-4966, 5 p.Article
The pitch of glissandi: effects of musical ability, gender, and listening conditionsPINEK, B; CAVE, C.Acta acustica (Les Ulis). 1994, Vol 2, Num 1, pp 59-63, issn 1022-4793Article
Phase effects on the perceived elevation of complex tonesHARTMANN, William M; BEST, Virginia; LEUNG, Johahn et al.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2010, Vol 127, Num 5, pp 3060-3072, issn 0001-4966, 13 p.Article
Dead regions and pitch perceptionHUSS, Martina; MOORE, Brian C. J.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2005, Vol 117, Num 6, pp 3841-3852, issn 0001-4966, 12 p.Article
Pitch discrimination interference : The role of pitch pulse asynchronyGOCKEL, Hedwig; CARLYON, Robert P; MOORE, Brian C. J et al.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2005, Vol 117, Num 6, pp 3860-3866, issn 0001-4966, 7 p.Article
On the nature of absolute pitchZAKAY, D; ROZINER, I; BEN-ARZI, S et al.Archiv für Psychologie. 1984, Vol 136, Num 2, pp 163-166, issn 0066-6475Article
Enhancing a tone by shifting its frequency or intensityERVITI, Mayalen; SEMAL, Catherine; DEMANY, Laurent et al.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2011, Vol 129, Num 6, pp 3837-3845, issn 0001-4966, 9 p.Article
The role of peripheral resolvability in pitch-sequence processingCOUSINEAU, Marion; DEMANY, Laurent; PRESSNITZER, Daniel et al.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2010, Vol 128, Num 5, issn 0001-4966, 3499701.1-3499701.6Article
Greater sensitivity to prosodic goodness in non-native than in native listeners (L)CUTLER, Anne.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2009, Vol 125, Num 6, pp 3522-3525, issn 0001-4966, 4 p.Article
Reduced contribution of a nonsimultaneous mistuned harmonic to residue pitch : The role of harmonic number (L)GOCKEL, Hedwig E; CARLYON, Robert P; PLACK, Christopher J et al.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2009, Vol 125, Num 1, pp 15-18, issn 0001-4966, 4 p.Article
Focus, prosodic context, and phonological feature specification : Patterns of variation in fricative productionSILBERT, Noah; DE JONG, Kenneth.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2008, Vol 123, Num 5, pp 2769-2779, issn 0001-4966, 11 p., 1Article
Frequency discrimination of complex tones; assessing the role of component resolvability and temporal fine structureMOORE, Brian C. J; GLASBERG, Brian R; FLANAGAN, Helen J et al.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2006, Vol 119, Num 1, pp 480-490, issn 0001-4966, 11 p.Article
A perceptual learning investigation of the pitch elicited by amplitude-modulated noiseFITZGERALD, Matthew B; WRIGHT, Beverly A.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2005, Vol 118, Num 6, pp 3794-3803, issn 0001-4966, 10 p.Article