CHOOSING THE MOST POWERFUL PAIRWISE MULTIPLE COMPARISON PROCEDURE IN MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCERAMSEY PH.1980; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 65; NO 3; PP. 317-326; BIBL. 35 REF.Article

UPDATING RECOMMENDATIONS ABOUT PROPORTIONAL CELL FREQUENCIES IN THE 2^K ANALYSIS OF VARIANCERAMSEY PH.1980; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 50; NO 2; PP. 570; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

POWER OF UNIVARIATE PAIRWISE MULTIPLE COMPARISON PROCEDURESRAMSEY PH.1981; PSYCHOL. BULL.; ISSN 0033-2909; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 90; NO 2; PP. 352-366; BIBL. 29 REF.Article

PROPORTIONAL CELL FREQUENCIES IN THE 2 BY 2 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE.RAMSEY PH.1978; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 46; NO 1; PP. 179-183; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

POWER DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PAIRWISE MULTIPLE COMPARISONSRAMSEY PH; GABRIEL KR.1978; J. AMER. STATIST. ASS.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 73; NO 363; PP. 479-487; BIBL. 29 REF.Article

PATIENT COMPLIANCE WITH ADVICE AS A FUNCTION OF COMMUNICATOR EXPERTISE.LEVINE BA; MOSS KC; RAMSEY PH et al.1978; J. SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 104; NO 2; PP. 309-310; BIBL. 4 REF.Article