RANDOMIZATION BY CLUSTER: SAMPLE SIZE REQUIREMENTS AND ANALYSISDONNER A; BIRKETT N; BUCK C et al.1981; AM. J. EPIDEMIOL.; ISSN 0002-9262; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 114; NO 6; PP. 906-914; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

RESTRICTED RANDOMIZATION DESIGNS IN CLINICAL TRIALSSIMON R.1979; BIOMETRICS; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 35; NO 2; PP. 503-512; ABS. FRE; BIBL. 33 REF.Article

ON THE RISK-EQUIVALENCE OF TWO METHODS OF RANDOMIZATION IN STATISTICS.KIRSCHNER HP.1976; J. MULTIVAR. ANAL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 6; NO 1; PP. 159-166; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

SULLA TEORIA DELLE DECISIONI CON CASUALIZZAZIONE AUSILIARIA. = SUR LA THEORIE DES DECISIONS AVEC RANDOMISATION AUXILIAIREIANNOTTA P; PESARIN F.1977; STATISTICA; ITAL.; DA. 1977; VOL. 37; NO 4; PP. 515-524; ABS. ANGL. FR.; BIBL. 1 P.Article

SULL' USO DI QUESITI CHE TUTELANO COMPLETAMENTE LA RISERVATEZZA DELL'INFORMAZIONE. = SUR LES TECHNIQUES D'ENQUETES PAR RANDOMISATIONMARBACH G.1975; METRON; ITAL.; DA. 1975 PARU 1978; VOL. 33; NO 3-4; PP. 309-334; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 3 P.Article

RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS IN NEUROSURGERYHAINES SJ.1983; NEUROSURGERY; ISSN 0148-396X; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 12; NO 3; PP. 259-264; BIBL. 51 REF.Article

AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF CLUSTER RANDOMIZATIONDONNER A.1982; INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY; ISSN 0300-5771; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 11; NO 3; PP. 283-286; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

CLINICAL TRIALS: RANDOMIZATION BEFORE CONSENTARMSTRONG PW; WATTS DG.1981; BIOMEDICINE; ISSN 0300-0893; FRA; DA. 1981; VOL. 34; NO 2; PP. 65-66; ABS. FRE; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

RANDOMISTERTE ZESTEN UND PROZESSE MIT UNABHAENGIGEN ZURVAECHSEN = INSTANTS ET PROCESSUS RANDOMISES AVEC INCREMENTS INDEPENDANTSDOEHLER R.1979; WISSENSCHAFFL. Z. TECH. HOCHSCH. KARL-MARX-STADT; DDR; DA. 1979; VOL. 21; NO 5; PP. 627-631; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

RANDOMIZATION. PRO AND CONTRABUNKE H; BUNKE O.1978; MATH. OPER.-FORSCH. STATIST., STATIST.; DDR; DA. 1978; VOL. 9; NO 4; PP. 607-623; BIBL. 43 REF.Article

A METHOD FOR CONSTRUCTING VALID RESTRICTED RANDOMIZATION SCHEMES USING THE THEORY OF D-OPTIMAL DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTSWHITE LV; WELCH WJ.1981; J.R. STAT. SOC., B; ISSN 0035-9246; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 43; NO 2; PP. 167-172; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

THE FOUNDATIONS OF SURVEY SAMPLING: A REVIEW.SMITH TMF.1976; J. R. STATIST. SOC., A; G.B.; DA. 1976; VOL. 139; NO 2; PP. 183-204; BIBL. 1 P.Article

A NEW DISCRETE QUANTITATIVE RANDOMIZED RESPONSE MODEL.LIU PT; CHOW LP.1976; J. AMER. STATIST. ASS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 71; NO 353; PP. 72-73; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

ERGEBNISSE DER THERAPIE DER AKUTEN PANKREATITIS MIT UND OHNE PROTEINASENINHIBITOREN. EINE PROSPEKTIVE STUDIE = RESULTATS DU TRAITEMENT DE LA PANCREATITE AIGUE AVEC ET SANS INHIBITEURS DES PROTEASES. UNE ETUDE PROSPECTIVEKIRSCH A; WERNER U; WECKNER W et al.1975; DTSCHE GESUNDH.-WES.; DTSCH.; DA. 1975; VOL. 30; NO 23; PP. 1096-1101; ABS. RUSSE ANGL.; BIBL. 21REF.Article

RANDOMIZATION TEST FOR FACTORIAL DESIGNSWU SC; WILLIAMS JS.1972; IN: COMPUT. SCI. STAT. 5TH ANNU. SYMP. INTERFACE. STILLWATER, OKLA, 1971. PROC.; S.L.; OKLAHOMA STATE UNIV.; DA. 1972; PP. 158-162; BIBL. 6 REF.Conference Paper

ESTIMATION IN RANDOMISED RESPONSE TRIALSGODAMBE VP.1980; INTERNATION. STATIST. REV.; GBR; DA. 1980; VOL. 48; NO 1; PP. 29-32; ABS. FRE; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

NOTES SUR LES TECHNIQUES DE REPONSES RANDOMISEESSUZUKI T; TAKAHASI K; SAKASEGANA H et al.1976; PROC. INST. STATIST. MATH.; JAP.; DA. 1976; VOL. 24; NO 1; PP. 1-13; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

SCRAMBLED RANDOMIZED RESPONSE METHODS FOR OBTAINING SENSITIVE QUANTITATIVE DATAEICHHORN BH; HAYRE LS.1983; JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE; ISSN 0378-3758; NLD; DA. 1983; VOL. 7; NO 4; PP. 307-316; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

DISTRIBUTION DES PRODUITS DE PROCESSUS MULTIPLES ET DISTRIBUTION CONTAGIEUSE DE NEYMANGALKIN V YA; UFIMTSEV MV.1982; VESTN. MASK. UNIV., SER. 15: VYCISL. MAT. KIBERN.; ISSN 509701; SUN; DA. 1982; NO 2; PP. 41-51; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

CLINICAL STUDIES. VIII: THE LIMITATIONS OF THE CANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALFREIREICH E; GEHAM EA.1979; METHODS CANCER RES.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 17; PP. 277-310; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

A COMPARISON OF THREE RANDOMIZED RESPONSE MODELS FOR QUANTITATIVE DATA.POLLOCK KH; BEK Y.1976; J. AMER. STATIST. ASS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 71; NO 356; PP. 884-886; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL OF STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING MEDICATION COMPLIANCE IN PRIMARY HYPERTENSION. = ETUDE CLINIQUE RANDOMISEE DES STRATEGIES POUR AMELIORER LE RESPECT DU TRAITEMENT DANS L'HYPERTENSION PRIMAIRESACKETT DL; HAYNES RB; GIBSON ES et al.1975; LANCET; G.B.; DA. 1975; NO 7918; PP. 1205-1207; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

ON PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS OF SINGLE-LINKAGE DENDROGRAMSFRANK O; SVENSSON K.1981; J. STAT. COMPUT. SIMUL.; ISSN 0094-9655; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 12; NO 2; PP. 121-131; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

SAMPLING THE RANDOMIZATION DISTRIBUTIONWALTERS DE.1981; STATISTICIAN; ISSN 0039-0526; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 30; NO 4; PP. 289-295; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: R. A. FISHER AND SOME MODERN RIVALSPEARCE SC.1979; STATISTICIAN; GBR; DA. 1979; VOL. 28; NO 3; PP. 153-161; BIBL. 15 REF.Article