ATTITUDE AND KNOWLEDGE EFFECTS IN PROSE PROCESSINGTYLER SW; VOSS JF.1982; JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR; ISSN 0022-5371; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 21; NO 5; PP. 524-538; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

CATEGORY SIZE AND FREE RECALLNELSON DI; MCEVOY CL; CASANUEVA DM et al.1982; AM. J. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0002-9556; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 95; NO 2; PP. 235-249; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

LA MEMOIRE EPISODIQUE EST-ELLE EMBOITEE DANS LA MEMOIRE SEMANTIQUE .LIEURY A.1979; ANNEE PSYCHOL.; FRA; DA. 1979; VOL. 79; NO 1; PP. 123-142; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

A TEST OF PARALLEL VERSUS SERIAL PROCESSING APPLIED TO MEMORY RETRIEVALROSS BH; ANDERSON JR.1981; J. MATH. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-2496; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 24; NO 3; PP. 183-223; BIBL. 31 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF INCENTIVE ON WED RECALLEYSENCK MW; EYSENCK MC.1982; Q. J. EXP. PSYCHOL., SECT. A, HUM. EXP. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0272-4987; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 34; NO 4; PP. 489-498; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

ELABORATIVE ENCODING AS AN EXPLANATION OF LEVELS OF PROCESSINGBRADSHAW GL; ANDERSON JR.1982; J. VERB. LEARN. VERB. BEHAV.; ISSN 0022-5371; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 21; NO 2; PP. 165-174; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

HOW SIMILAR IS IMMEDIATE MEMORY IN AMNESIC PATIENTS TO DELAYED MEMORY IN NORMAL SUBJECTS. A REPLICATION, EXTENSION AND REASSESSMENT OF THE AMNESIC CUEING EFFECTMAYES AR; MEUDELL PR.1981; NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA; ISSN 0028-3932; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 19; NO 5; PP. 647-654; ABS. FRE/GER; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

REMEMBERING THE RECALL OF CUED AND UNCUED WORDS: EFFECTS OF INITIAL ACCESSIBILITYKLEE H; GARDINER JM.1980; CAN. J. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0008-4255; CAN; DA. 1980; VOL. 34; NO 3; PP. 220-226; ABS. FRE; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

MEMORY FOR SENTENCES: THE SUBJECT SUPERIORITY EFFECTADAMS R; BERRY C.1981; Q. J. EXP. PSYCHOL., SECT. A, HUM. EXP. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0272-4987; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 33; NO 3; PP. 295-307; BIBL. 32 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF SEMANTIC AND PERCEPTUAL ORIENTING TASKS ON PRESCHOOL CHILDREN'S MEMORYPERLMUTTER M; SCHORK EJ; LEWIS D et al.1982; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; ISSN 0090-5054; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 19; NO 2; PP. 65-68; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

CONGRUITY AND ELABORATION IN FREE AND CUED RECALLHALL DM; GEIS MF.1980; J. EXP. PSYCHOL., HUM. LEARN. MEM.; ISSN 0096-1515; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 6; NO 6; PP. 778-784; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

A CONDITIONING ANALYSIS OF INFANT LONG-TERM MEMORYSULLIVAN MW; KENT ROVEE COLLIER C; TYNES DM et al.1979; CHILD. DEVELOP.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 50; NO 1; PP. 152-162; BIBL. 35 REF.Article

CUE VERSUS ITEM COMMONALITY IN INTERFERENCECERASO J; TIMMERMAN R; VELK R et al.1982; J. EXP. PSYCHOL., LEARN. MEM. CONG.; ISSN 504254; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 8; NO 4; PP. 289-296; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

VISUAL SHORT-TERM CUED RECALL MEMORY IN INFANCYBRODY LR.1982; CHILD DEV.; ISSN 0009-3920; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 52; NO 1; PP. 242-250; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

SENTENCE CUING AND THE EFFECTIVENESS OF BIZARRE IMAGERYWOLLEN KA; COX SD.1981; J. EXP. PSYCHOL., HUM. LEARN MEM.; ISSN 0096-1515; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 7; NO 5; PP. 386-392; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

CUED RECALL FOR FOUR-WORD CATEGORIES PRESENTED IN SEPARATE PAIRSWEIGEL GA; SCHENDEL JD; HALFF HM et al.1980; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 15; NO 5; PP. 361-364; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

EFFECT OF A RECOGNITION TEST ON SUBSEQUENT CUED-RECALL TESTBOWYER PA; HUMPHREYS MS.1979; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., HUM. LEARNG MEM.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 5; NO 4; PP. 348-359; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

CAUSAL COHERENCE AND MEMORY FOR EVENTS IN NARRATIVESBLACK JB; BERN H.1981; J. VERB. LEARN. VERB. BEHAV.; ISSN 0022-5371; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 20; NO 3; PP. 267-275; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

INSTRUMENT INTERFERENCES IN SENTENCE ENCODINGCORBETT AT; DOSHER BA.1978; J. VERB. LEARNG VERB. BEHAV.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 17; NO 4; PP. 479-491; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

WHEN RETRIEVAL CUEING FAILSWATKINS MJ; TULVING E.1978; BRIT. J. PSYCHOL.; GBR; DA. 1978; VOL. 69; NO 4; PP. 443-450; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

CONGRUENCY, SCORING METHOD, AND ENCODING SPECIFICITY IN CUED RECALLWOHL MK; IZAWA C.1980; J. GEN. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 102; NO 1; PP. 13-26; BIBL. 47 REF.Article

TYPE I REHEARSAL AND RECOGNITIONGLENBERG A; ADAMS F.1978; J. VERB. LEARNG VERB. BEHAV.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 17; NO 4; PP. 455-463; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

Relative efficacy of different encoding structures and judgment topics in a cued-recall taskALICKE, M. D; KLOTZ, M. L; SCHOPLER, J et al.Journal of research in personality (Print). 1985, Vol 19, Num 3, pp 261-270, issn 0092-6566Article

Illusions of Competence for Phonetically, Orthographically, and Semantically Similar Word PairsTIEDE, Heather L; LEBOE, Jason P.Canadian journal of experimental psychology. 2009, Vol 63, Num 4, pp 294-302, issn 1196-1961, 9 p.Article

Part-set cuing of false memoriesREYSEN, Matthew B; NAIRNE, James S.Psychonomic bulletin & review. 2002, Vol 9, Num 2, pp 389-393, issn 1069-9384Article