kw.\*:("REACTION TIME")
Results 1 to 25 of 7019
Selection :
VARIABLE CRITERION ANALYSIS OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND STIMULUS SIMILARITY IN CHOICE REACTION TIMEGRICE GR; SPIKER VA; NULLMEYER R et al.1979; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 25; NO 5; PP. 353-370; BIBL. 13 REF.Article
CAPACITY SHARING AND REFRACTORINESS IN SUCCESSIVE REACTIONS.KAFRY D; KAHNEMAN D.1977; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 44; NO 1; PP. 327-335; BIBL. 8 REF.Article
DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF SIMPLE AND CHOICE REACTION AFTER CLOSED HEAD INJURY.VAN ZOMEREN AH; DEELMAN BG.1976; CLIN. NEUROL. NEUROSURG.; NETHERL.; DA. 1976; VOL. 79; NO 2; PP. 81-90; BIBL. 18 REF.Article
STERNBERGS ADDITIVE FACTOR METHOD AND UNDERLYING PSYCHOLOGICAL PROCESSES: SOME THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONSPIETERS JPM.1983; PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN; ISSN 0033-2909; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 93; NO 3; PP. 411-426; BIBL. 45 REF.Article
CARACTERISTIQUES DE FORMATION DE REPONSE SENSORI-MOTRICE A LA LUMIERE ET A L'OBSCURITE D'APRES DES DONNEES D'INDICES STATISTIQUES DE TEMPS DE LATENCELOSKUTOVA TD.1983; FIZIOLOGIJA CELOVEKA; ISSN 505919; SUN; DA. 1983; VOL. 9; NO 4; PP. 584-592; BIBL. 29 REF.Article
LATENCY-PROBABILITY FUNCTIONS AS BASES FOR EVALUATING COMPETING ACCOUNTS OF THE SENSORY DECISION PROCESSWEATHERBURN D.1978; PSYCHOL. BULL.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 85; NO 6; PP. 1344-1347; BIBL. 13 REF.Article
OPERATOR'S ACTIVITIES AT CRT TERMINALS: A BEHAVIOURAL APPROACHDELVOLVE N; QUEINNEC Y.1983; ERGONOMICS; ISSN 0014-0139; GBR; DA. 1983; VOL. 26; NO 4; PP. 329-340; ABS. FRE/GER/JAP; BIBL. 2 P.Article
REACTION TIMES OF DOWN'S SYNDROME AND OTHER MENTALLY RETARDED INDIVIDUALSMACKAY DN; BANKEAD I.1983; PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS; ISSN 0031-5125; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 56; NO 1; PP. 266; BIBL. 3 REF.Article
A TEST OF THE FIXED-POINT PROPERTY OF THE TWO-STATE MODEL FOR SIMPLE REACTION TIMEOKAMOTO Y.1982; JAPANESE PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH; ISSN 0021-5368; JPN; DA. 1982; VOL. 24; NO 4; PP. 222-224; BIBL. 3 REF.Article
COMPARISON OF MONOSYNAPTIC TENDON REFLEXES DURING PREPARATION FOR BALLISTIC OR RAMP MOVEMENTBONNET M.1981; ELECTROENCEPHALOGR. CLIN. NEUROPHYSIOL.; ISSN 0013-4694; NLD; DA. 1981; VOL. 51; NO 4; PP. 353-362; ABS. FRE; BIBL. 19 REF.Article
OCULOMOTOR REACTION TIME IN DEMENTIA REFLECTS DEGREE OF CEREBRAL DYSFUNCTIONPIROZZOLO FJ; HANSCH EC.1981; SCIENCE; ISSN 0036-8075; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 214; NO 4518; PP. 349-351; BIBL. 21 REF.Article
INSTRUCTION BIAS AND SIMPLE REACTION TIMEBARTELS M; BECK J; CLAYSON D et al.1979; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 48; NO 3 PART. 1; PP. 774; BIBL. 6 REF.Article
MEASURING REACTION TIME WITH MILLISECOND ACCURACY USING THE TRS-80 MICROCOMPUTEROWINGS RA; FIEDLER CH.1979; BEHAV. RES. METHODS INSTRUMENT.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 11; NO 6; PP. 589-591; BIBL. 7 REF.Article
LES LIENS ENTRE LES PARAMETRES PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIQUES ET L'ASSURANCE PROFESSIONNELLE CHEZ LES MECANOGRAPHESAMINEV GA; KADIROV M KH.1978; VOPR. PSIKHOL.; SUN; DA. 1978; NO 4; PP. 128-132; BIBL. 9 REF.Article
DISTRIBUTIONS OF SIMPLE RT WITH SINGLE AND DOUBLE STIMULI.MEIJERS LMM; EIJKMAN EGJ.1977; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 22; NO 1; PP. 41-48; BIBL. 22 REF.Article
NEGATIVE AND POSITIVE INCENTIVE CONTRAST IN HUMANS WITH MALES VS FEMALES, MONETARY REINFORCEMENT, AND REACTION TIME.WEINSTEIN L.1977; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 9; NO 4; PP. 297-299; BIBL. 4 REF.Article
THE RELIABILITY OF REACTION TIME DETERMINATIONS.HAMSHER K DE S; BENTON AL.1977; CORTEX; ITALY; DA. 1977; VOL. 13; NO 3; PP. 306-310; BIBL. 12 REF.Article
BEHAVIORAL EFFECTS IN MONKEYS EXPOSED TO EXTREMELY LOW FREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS.DE LORGE JO; GRISSETT JD.1977; INTERNATION. J. BIOMETEOROL.; NETHERL.; DA. 1977; VOL. 21; NO 4; PP. 357-365; BIBL. 2 P.Article
QUICK CALCULATION OF HYDROCARBON CRACKING TIMES.ZANKER A.1976; PROCESS ENGNG; G.B.; DA. 1976-10; PP. 90-91; BIBL. 2 REF.Article
LES CHANGEMENTS DANS LES TEMPS DE REACTION DEPENDANT DE LA STRUCTURE DE LA SITUATIONNOSAL CS.1976; PRZEGL. PSYCHOL.; POLSKA; DA. 1976; VOL. 19; NO 4; PP. 465-478; ABS. ANGL. RUSSE; BIBL. 13 REF.Article
REACTIETIJDMETING IN DE KLINISCHE NEUROPSYCHOLOGIE. = MESURE DU TEMPS DE REACTION DANS LA NEUROPSYCHOLOGIE CLINIQUEVAN ZOMEREN AH; DEELMAN BG.1976; NEDERL. T. PSYCHOL.; NEDERL.; DA. 1976; VOL. 31; NO 7; PP. 377-391; BIBL. 19 REF.Article
EFFECTS OF PERCEPTUAL AND COGNITIVE DIFFICULTY ON P3 AND RT IN YOUNG AND OLD ADULTSFORD JM; PFEFFERBAUM A; TINKLENBERG JR et al.1982; ELECTROENCEPHALOGR. CLIN. NEUROPHYSIOL.; ISSN 0013-4694; NLD; DA. 1982; VOL. 54; NO 3; PP. 311-321; ABS. FRE; BIBL. 17 REF.Article
PROBABILISTIC ASSIGNMENTS OF SENTENCE RELATIONS ON THE BASIS OF DIFFERENTIALLY WEIGHTED INTERPRETIVE CUESFRANKEL DG; ARBEL T.1982; JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH; ISSN 0090-6905; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 11; NO 5; PP. 447-464; BIBL. 24 REF.Article
RADAR-MEASURED REACTION TIMES OF UNALTERED DRIVES TO BRAKE SIGNALSSIVAK M; OLSON PL; FARMER KM et al.1982; PERCEPT MOT. SKILLS; ISSN 0031-5125; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 55; NO 2; PP. 594; BIBL. 2 REF.Article
EFFECTS OF UNCERTAINTIES OF TIME AND OCCURRENCE ON REACTION TIME OF MENTALLY HANDICAPPED STUDENTSSURBURG PR.1981; PERCEPT. MOT. SKILLS; ISSN 0031-5125; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 53; NO 2; PP. 355-360; BIBL. 25 REF.Article