EFFECTS OF PUNISHMENT IN AN ALTERNATIVE RESPONSE CONTEXT AS A FUNCTION OF RELATIVE REINFORCEMENT RATE = EFFETS DE LA PUNITION AVEC PRESENCE D'UNE REPONSE ALTERNATIVE, FONCTION DU TAUX DE RENFORCEMENT RELATIFKATZ RC.1973; PHYSIOL. REC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 23; NO 1; PP. 65-74; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

IMITATION AS A FUNCTION OF RESPONSE COMMONALITY, SERIAL ORDER, AND VICARIOUS PUNISHMENTSPIEGLER MD.1973; J. EXPER. CHILD PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 15; NO 1; PP. 116-124; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

THE EFFECT OF ELECTRIC SHOCK UPON A NONLOCOMOTOR MEASURE OF EXPLORATION = L'EFFET DU CHOC ELECTRIQUE SUR UNE MESURE NON LOCOMOTRICE DE L'EXPLORATIONGILLEN B.1973; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 1; NO 2; PP. 121-122; BIBL. 14REF.Article

EFFECTS OF PUNISHING DIFFERENT BANDS OF IRTS ON DRL RESPONDING = EFFETS DU RENFORCEMENT NEGATIF DE CERTAINS INTERVALLES ENTRE LES REPONSES SUR LA REPONSE AUX PROGRAMMES DE RENFORCEMENT DIFFERENTIEL DES TAUX DE REPONSE A SUCCESSION RAPIDETOPPING JS; PICKERING JW.1972; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 31; NO 1; PP. 19-22; BIBL. 10REF.Article

SCHEDULES OF ELECTRIC SHOCK PRESENTATION IN THE BEHAVIORAL CONTROL OF IMPRINTED DUCKLINGS = SCHEMAS DE LA PRESENTATION DE CHOC ELECTRIQUE DANS LE CAS DU CONTROLE COMPORTEMENTAL DE CANETONS AYANT SUBI UNE EMPREINTEBARRETT JE.1972; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 18; NO 2; PP. 305-321; BIBL. 26REF.Article

SELF-PUNITIVE AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR IN THE MONGOLIAN GERBIL = COMPORTEMENT D'EVITEMENT AUTOPUNITIF CHEZ LA GERBILLE MONGOLIENNEBYRUM RP; MELVIN KB.1972; PSYCHON. SCI.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 28; NO 1; PP. 13-15; BIBL. 11REF.Article

BEHAVIORAL CONTRAST WITH TIMEOUT, BLACKOUT, OR EXTINCTION AS THE NEGATIVE CONDITION = COMPORTEMENT CONTRASTE AVEC TEMPS MORT, INTERRUPTION OU EXTINCTION COMME CONDITION NEGATIVESADOWSKY S.1973; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 19; NO 3; PP. 499-507; BIBL. 1P.Article

DEVELOPMENT OF THE REINFORCING EFFECT OF SIGNALING MODIFIABLE SHOCK = LE DEVELOPPEMENT DE L'EFFET RENFORCATEUR DU SIGNAL DU CHOC CONTROLABLEFUREDY JJ; BIEDERMAN GB.1972; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 35; NO 1; PP. 31-34; BIBL. 3REF.Article

A NEURAL THEORY OF PUNISHMENT AND AVOIDANCE, II: QUANTITATIVE THEORY = UNE THEORIE NEUROLOGIQUE DE LA PUNITION ET DE L'EVITEMENT II+ THEORIE QUANTITATIVEGROSSBERG S.1972; MATH. BIOSCI.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 15; NO 3-4; PP. 253-285; BIBL. 3P.Article

RESPONDING IN THE SQUIRREL MONKEY UNDER SECOND-ORDER SCHEDULES OF SHOCK DELIVERY = REPONSE CHEZ LE SAGOUIN LORS DE PROGRAMMES D'APPLICATION DE CHOCS DE SECOND ORDREBYRD LD.1972; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 18; NO 1; PP. 155-167; BIBL. 35 REF.Article

FACILITATION AND SUPPRESSION OF RESPONDING UNDER TEMPORALLY DEFINED SCHEDULES OF NEGATIVE REINFORCEMENT = OBTENTION PLUS FACILE OU INHIBITION DES REPONSES SOUS L'INFLUENCE DE RENFORCEMENTS NEGATIFS A SEQUENCES DEFINIESKADDEN RM.1973; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 19; NO 3; PP. 469-480; BIBL. 1P.Article

THE EFFECT OF INTERMITTENT PUNISHMENT-PARTIAL REWARD TRAINING ON RESISTANCE TO CONTINUOUS PUNISHMENT = L'EFFET DE LA TECHNIQUE DE RENFORCEMENT PARTIEL ASSOCIE A UNE TECHNIQUE DE PUNITION INTERMITTENTE SUR LA RESISTANCE A LA PUNITION CONTINUETORNEY DJ.1973; CANAD. J. PSYCHOL.; CANADA; DA. 1973; VOL. 27; NO 1; PP. 1-6; ABS. FR.; BIBL. 8REF.Article

PUNISHMENT CONTRAST DURING FREE-OPERANT AVOIDANCE = CONTRASTE PUNITION DURANT L'EVITEMENT INSTRUMENTAL LIBRELATTAL KA; GRIFFIN MA.1972; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 18; NO 3; PP. 509-516; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

THE ROLE OF SANCTION IN DRINKING BEHAVIOR = ROLE DES SANCTIONS DANS LE COMPORTEMENT DES BUVEURSMCGONEGAL J.1972; QUART. J. STUD. ALCOHOL, A; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 33; NO 3; PP. 692-697; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

AN INEXPENSIVE DUAL LEAD SLIP-RING FOR USE WITH TAIL-SHOCK ELECTRODES = UN ANNEAU DOUBLE EN PLOMB PEU COUTEUX A UTILISER AVEC DES ELECTRODES POUR L'APPLICATION DE CHOCS SUR LA QUEUEBALL FM; DESIDERATO O.1972; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 18; NO 1; PP. 179-180; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

ROBUST-SINGLE-TRIAL DELAYED BACKWARD CONDITIONING = CONDITIONNEMENT RETROGRADE RETARDE A UN SEUL ESSAI CONSISTANTKEITH LUCAS T; GUTTMAN N.1975; J. COMP. PHYSIOL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 88; NO 1; PP. 468-476; BIBL. 22REFArticle

IMMUNIZATION TO AND ALLEVIATION OF LEARNED HELPLESSNESS IN MANTHORNTON JW; POWELL GD.1974; AMER. J. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 87; NO 3; PP. 351-367; BIBL. 19REF.Article

PUNISHMENT AS A VARIABLE IN SEQUENTIAL LEARNINGKAUFMAN MC; ADERMAN M; WOLACH A et al.1974; AUSTRAL. J. PSYCHOL.; AUSTRAL.; DA. 1974; VOL. 26; NO 2; PP. 121-130; BIBL. 10REF.Article

STIMULUS-REINFORCER INTERACTIONS IN THE PIGEON: THE ROLE OF ELECTRIC SHOCK AND THE AVOIDANCE CONTINGENCYFOREE DD; LOLORDO VM.1975; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., ANIMAL BEHAV. PROCESS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 104; NO 1; PP. 39-46; BIBL. 7REFArticle

EFFECTS OF INTERMITTENT AND CONSTANT PUNISHMENT ON RESISTANCE TO PUNISHMENT IN A FREE OPERANT SITUATION FOR THE ALBINO RAT = EFFETS DE LA PUNITION CONSTANTE ET INTERMITTENTE SUR LA RESISTANCE A LA PUNITION DANS UNE SITUATION OPERATIONNELLE LIBRE CHEZ LE RATQUIRT BM; COHEN JS.1974; J. COMP. PHYSIOL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 87; NO 3; PP. 539-547; BIBL. 13REF.Article

LEVER-CONTACT RESPONSES IN RATS: AUTOMAINTENANCE WITH AND WITHOUT A NEGATIVE RESPONSE-REINFORCER DEPENDENCYSTIERS M; SILBERBERG A.1974; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 22; NO 3; PP. 497-506; BIBL. 16REF.Article

TIMING OF AVOIDANCE RESPONSES BY RATSLIBRY ME; CHURCH RM.1974; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 22; NO 3; PP. 513-517; BIBL. 10REF.Article

A NOTE ON THE CONDITIONED STIMULUS CONTROL OF POSTSHOCK RESPONDINGHURWITZ HMB.1974; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 4; NO 6; PP. 554-556; BIBL. 12REF.Article

CONTIGUOUS APPROACH CONDITIONING: A MODEL FOR NEGATIVE REINFORCEMENT.MAPLES EG; TOMPOROWSKI PD; HARAWAY MM et al.1975; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 37; NO 3 PART. 1; PP. 851-856; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

INTRATRIAL RESPONSE SPEED IN FIXED-RATIO BEHAVIOR: A COMPARISON OF POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE REINFORCEMENTPOZULP NC II; SENKOWSKI PC.1975; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 5; NO 6; PP. 441-443; BIBL. 5REFArticle