THE VALUE-AVERAGING MODEL: AN ALTERNATIVE TO "CONSERVATION IN BEHAVIOR"MAZUR JE.1979; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., GEN.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 108; NO 1; PP. 43-47; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

REGULATION AND TIME ALLOCATION: COMMENT ON "CONSERVATION IN BEHAVIOR"STADDON JER.1979; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., GEN.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 108; NO 1; PP. 35-40; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

A TWO-PROCESS THEORY OF LEARNED HELPLESSNESS.KOLLER PS; KAPLAN RM.1978; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 96; NO 10; PP. 1177-1183; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

PAIRED BASELINE PERFORMANCE AS A BEHAVIORAL IDEALALLISON J.1981; J. EXP. ANAL. BEHAV.; ISSN 0022-5002; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 35; NO 3; PP. 355-366; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

HOMOGENIZING THE 2 X 2 CONTINGENCY TABLE: A METHOD FOR REMOVING DEPENDENCIES DUE TO SUBJECT AND ITEM DIFFERENCESFLEXSER AJ.1981; PSYCHOL. REV.; ISSN 0033-295X; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 88; NO 4; PP. 327-339; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

SUPPRESSION OF CHRONIC HYPERVENTILATION USING RESPONSE-CONTINGENT AROMATIC AMMONIASINGH NN; DAWSON MJ; GREGORY PR et al.1980; BEHAV. THER.; ISSN 0005-7894; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 11; NO 4; PP. 561-566; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

INFLUENCE OF CONTINGENT RESPONDING ON SCHEDULE-INDUCED ACTIVITY IN HUMAN SUBJECTSLASITER PS.1979; PHYSIOL. AND BEHAV.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 22; NO 2; PP. 239-243; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

KONTINGENZERWARTUNGEN BEI REAKTIONSINKONTINGENTER TREFFERRUECKMELDUNG = EXPECTATION DE CONTINGENCE DANS LE CAS D'UNE RETROACTION DE REUSSITE INDEPENDANTE DE LA REPONSERUEBELING H.1981; ARCH. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0066-6475; DEU; DA. 1981-1982; VOL. 134; NO 1; PP. 33-46; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 1 P.Article

SIMPSON'S PARADOX RESOLVED: A REPLY TO HINTZMANMARTIN E.1981; PSYCHOL. REV.; ISSN 0033-295X; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 88; NO 4; PP. 372-374; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

INSTRUMENTAL AVOIDANCE ACQUISITION BY GOLDFISH IN A Y-MAZE USING EXPLICIT AND RESPONSE-CONTINGENT CUESZERBOLIO DJ JR; WICKSTRA LL.1980; ANIMAL LEARNG BEHAV.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 8; NO 2; PP. 304-310; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

RESPONSE-CONTINGENT SENSORY CHANGE IN A CAUSALLY STRUCTURED ENVIRONMENT.GLOW PH; WINEFIELD AH.1978; ANIMAL LEARNG BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 6; NO 1; PP. 1-18; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

AN OPERANT PROCEDURE FOR TESTING OLFACTORY CAPACITIES IN RESTRAINED PIGEONSWALKER JC.1983; PHYSIOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR; ISSN 0031-9384; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 30; NO 1; PP. 165-168; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

BEHAVIOR INDUCED BY PERIODIC FOOD DELIVERY: THE EFFECTS OF INTERFOOD INTERVALINNIS NK; SIMMELHAG GRANT VL; STADDON JER et al.1983; JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR; ISSN 0022-5002; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 39; NO 2; PP. 309-322; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF A BRIEF STIMULUS ACCOMPANYING REINFORCEMENT ON INSTRUMENTAL RESPONDING IN PIGEONSHALL G.1982; LEARN. MOTIV.; ISSN 0023-9690; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 13; NO 1; PP. 26-43; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

EFFECT OF TRAINER'S PRESENCE AND RESPONSE-CONTINGENT FEEDBACK IN BIOFEEDBACK-RELAXATION TRAININGHAMBERGER LK; LOHR JM.1981; PERCEPT. MOT. SKILLS; ISSN 0031-5125; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 53; NO 1; PP. 15-24; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

BLOCKING AND ENHANCEMENT OF FEAR CONDITIONING BY APPETITIVE CSSGOODMAN JH; FOWLER H.1983; ANIMAL LEARNING AND BEHAVIOR; ISSN 0090-4996; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 11; NO 1; PP. 75-82; BIBL. 26 REF.Article

THE JUDGMENT OF CONTINGENCY AND THE NATURE OF THE RESPONSE ALTERNATIVESALLAN LG; JENKINS HM.1980; CANAD. J. PSYCHOL.; CAN; DA. 1980; VOL. 34; NO 1; PP. 1-11; ABS. FRE; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

LEVER PRESSING IN EXPANDING OR COLLAPSING INTERVALS OF NONRESPONSE-CONTINGENT REWARD: SENSITIVITY TO PRETRAININGNOWAK GP; PERSINGER MA; DEWSON MR et al.1982; PSYCHOL. REP.; ISSN 0033-2941; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 50; NO 3; PART. 2; PP. 1228-1230; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

STIMULUS AND RESPONSE CONTINGENCIES IN THE MISBEHAVIOR OF RATSTIMBERLAKE W; WAHL G; KING D et al.1982; J. EXP. PSYCHOL., ANIM. BEHAV. PROCESSES; ISSN 0097-7403; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 8; NO 1; PP. 62-85; BIBL. 28 REF.Article

JUDGMENT OF CONTINGENCY IN DEPRESSED AND NONDEPRESSED STUDENTS: SADDER BUT WISER.ALLOY LB; ABRAMSON LY.1978; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., GEN.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 108; NO 4; PP. 441-485; BIBL. 5 P.Article

SUBJECT'S PERCEPTIONS OF AND RESPONSES TO PUNISHMENTMAITLAND HA; CLARKE AM.1983; AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0004-9530; AUS; DA. 1983; VOL. 35; NO 1; PP. 11-20; BIBL. 2 P.Article

EFFECTS OF SCHEDULE CHANGES ON HUMAN PERFORMANCE: AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF THE CONTRASTING PREDICTIONS OF THE LAW OF EFFECT, THE PROBABILITY-DIFFERENTIAL MODEL, AND THE RESPONSE-DEPRIVATION APPROACHPODSAKOFF PM.1982; ORGAN. BEHAV. HUM. PERFORM.; ISSN 0030-5073; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 29; NO 3; PP. 322-351; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

THE EFFECTS OF A SIGNAL FOR FREE OR FOR EARNED REWARD: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ROLE OF RESPONSE-REINFORCER ASSOCIATIONS IN INSTRUMENTAL PERFORMANCEHALL G; CHANNELL S; PEARCE JM et al.1981; Q. J. EXP. PSYCHOL., SECT. B, COMP. PHYSIOL. PSYCHOL.; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 33; NO 2; PP. 95-107; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

PROACTIVITY AND REINFORCEMENT. THE CONTINGENCY OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR.WILLIAMS JS; GRAY LN; VON BROEMBSEN MH et al.1976; SMALL GROUP BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 7; NO 3; PP. 317-330; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

Page / 4