GENERALIZATION OF RELAXATION SKILLSMARQUIS JN; FERGUSON JM; TAYLOR CB et al.1980; J. BEHAV. THERAPY EXPER. PSYCHIATRY; GBR; DA. 1980; VOL. 11; NO 2; PP. 95-99; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

GENERALIZATION AS A DEFENSELOEB FF JR.1982; PSYCHOANALYTIC STUDY OF THE CHILD; ISSN 0079-7308; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 37; PP. 405-419; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

AN EXPERIMENT TO TEST GENERALIZATION OF FEEDBACK FROM FRONTALIS EMGLE BOEUF A.1980; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 50; NO 1; PP. 27-31; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

ELECTROMYOGRAPH BIOFEEDBACK: GENERALIZATION AND THE RELATIVE EFFECTS OF FEEDBACK, INSTRUCTIONS, AND ADAPTATIONDAVIS PJ.1980; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; ISSN 0048-5772; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 17; NO 6; PP. 604-612; BIBL. 29 REF.Article

GENERALISERING OG VARIGHET AV BEHANDLINGSEFFEKT: ET "STEBARN": ATFERDSTERAPEUTISK FORSKNING = DES RAISONS POUR LES INSUFFISANCES DE LA RECHERCHE EN MODIFICATION DU COMPORTEMENT SUR LA GENERALISATION ET LE MAINTIEN DU CHANGEMENT DE COMPORTEMENTTHORSEN SA; RONNING JA.1981; NORD. PSYKOL.; ISSN 0029-1463; DNK; DA. 1981; VOL. 33; NO 2; PP. 110-121; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 2 P.Article

SHAPING AND GENERALIZATION PROCEDURES IN THE EMG-BIOFEEDBACK TREATMENT OF TENSION HEADACHESCARROBLES JAI; CARDONA A; SANTACREU J et al.1981; BR. J. CLIN. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0144-6657; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 20; PART. 1; PP. 49-56; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

GENERALIZATION OF CONDITIONED MUSCLE TENSION: A CLOSER LOOKGLAUS KD; KOTSES H.1979; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 16; NO 6; PP. 513-519; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

MEASUREMENT AND GENERALITY OF RESPONSE DISPOSITIONS IN PERSON PERCEPTION.KAPLAN MF.1976; J. PERSONALITY; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 44; NO 2; PP. 179-194; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

PROGRAMMING "LOOSE TRAINING" AS A STRATEGY TO FACILITATE LANGUAGE GENERALIZATIONCAMPBELL CR; STREMEL CAMPBELL K.1982; J. APPL. BEHAV. ANAL.; ISSN 0021-8855; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 15; NO 2; PP. 295-301; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

CONTEXT-SPECIFICITY AND GENERALIZATION IN THE ACQUISITION OF PRONOMINAL DISTINCTIONSCHIAT S.1981; J. CHILD LANG.; ISSN 0305-0009; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 8; NO 1; PP. 75-91; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

GENERALIZED MUSCLE CHANGES DURING EMG RELAXATION TRAININGO'CONNELL MF; YEATON SP.1981; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; ISSN 0048-5772; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 18; NO 1; PP. 56-61; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

GENERALIZATION AND TRANSFER BETWEEN COMPREHENSION AND PRODUCTION: A COMPARISON OF RETARDED AND NONRETARDED PERSONSCUVO AJ; RIVA MT.1980; J. APPL. BEHAV. ANAL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 13; NO 2; PP. 315-331; BIBL. 2 P.Article

THE CENTRAL TENDENCY EFFECT IN STIMULUS GENERALIZATION: EFFECTS OF ESTABLISHING A "PREEXPERIMENTAL" FRAME OF REFERENCENEWLIN RJ; RODGERS JP; DICKSON JF JR et al.1978; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 24; NO 2; PP. 161-167; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

HOMOGENEITY AND HETEROGENEITY OF PROBLEM CLASS IN MODELING TREATMENT OF FEARS.LINEHAM KS; ROSENTHAL TL; KELLEY JE et al.1977; BEHAV. RES. THERAPY; G.B.; DA. 1977; VOL. 15; NO 2; PP. 211-215; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

THE MODIFICATION OF PARENT BEHAVIOR. A REVIEW OF GENERALIZATION AND MAINTENANCESANDERS MR; JAMES JE.1983; BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION; ISSN 0145-4455; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 7; NO 1; PP. 3-27; BIBL. 3 P.Article

MULTISTIMULUS DISCRIMINATION TRAININGAKINS FR; GOUVIER WD; LYONS JE et al.1982; JPN. PSYCHOL. RES.; ISSN 0021-5368; JPN; DA. 1982; VOL. 24; NO 1; PP. 39-43; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

OVERCORRECTION: AN EXAMINATION OF ITS RATIONALE AND TREATMENT EFFECTIVENESSMARHOLIN D II; LUISELLI JK; TOWNSEND NM et al.1980; PROG. BEHAV. MODIF.; ISSN 0099-037X; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 9; PP. 49-80; BIBL. 7 P.Article

GENERALIZATION IN THE RECEPTIVE AND PRODUCTIVE LANGUAGE OF PRESCHOOL CHILDRENCROMER CC; AULT RL.1979; J. EDUC. RES.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 73; NO 1; PP. 31-36; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

MAINTAINED GENERALIZATON GRADIENTS WITH CONTINGENT AND NON-CONTINGENT REINFORCEMENTHOWARD WW.1979; PSYCHOL. REP.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 45; NO 1; PP. 275-279; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

THE ROLE OF FENTANYL TRAINING DOSE AND OF THE ALTERNATIVE STIMULUS CONDITION IN DRUG GENERALIZATIONKOEK W; SLANGEN JL.1982; PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGIA; ISSN 0033-3158; DEU; DA. 1982; VOL. 76; NO 2; PP. 149-156; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

GENERALIZATION OF NAMING RESPONSES TO OBJECTS IN THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT AS A FUNCTION OR TRAINING STIMULUS MODALITY WITH RETARDED CHILDRENWELCH SJ; PEAR JF.1980; J. APPL. BEHAV. ANAL.; ISSN 0021-8855; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 13; NO 4; PP. 629-643; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

GENERALIZATION BY AUTISTIC-TYPE CHILDREN OF VERBAL RESPONSES ACROSS SETTINGSHANDLEMAN JS.1979; J. APPL. BEHAV. ANAL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 12; NO 2; PP. 273-282; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

SENSORY EXTINCTION AND SENSORY REINFORCEMENT PRINCIPLES FOR PROGRAMMING MULTIPLE ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR CHANGERINCOVER A; COOK R; PEOPLES A et al.1979; J. APPL. BEHAV. ANAL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 12; NO 2; PP. 221-233; BIBL. 29 REF.Article

SHARING IN PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FACILITATION, STIMULUS GENERALIZATION, RESPONSE GENERALIZATION, AND MAINTENANCEBARTON EJ; ASCIONE FR.1979; J. APPL. BEHAV. ANAL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 12; NO 3; PP. 417-430; BIBL. 24 REF.Article

PERCEPTION OF INVARIANTS BY FIVE-MONTH-OLD INFANTS: DIFFERENTIATION OF TWO TYPES OF MOTIONGIBSON EJ; ONSLEY CJ; JOHNSTON J et al.1978; DEVELOP. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 14; NO 4; PP. 407-415; BIBL. 18 REF.Article