COMMENTS ON THREE METHODS OF SCORING ANDROGYNY AS A CONTINUOUS VARIABLEBLACKMAN S.1982; PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS; ISSN 0033-2941; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 51; NO 3; PP. 1100-1102; BIBL. 2 P.Article

PSYCHOLOGICAL ANDROGYNY AND SEXUAL ADEQUACYSAFIR MP; PERES Y; LICHTENSTEIN M et al.1982; JOURNAL OF SEX AND MARITAL THERAPY; ISSN 0092-623X; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 8; NO 3; PP. 228-240; BIBL. 29 REF.Article

FACTOR ANALYSIS OF SEX-TYPED ITEMS FROM THE BEM SEX-ROLE INVENTORY: A REPLICATIONCOLLINS M; WATERS CW; WATERS LK et al.1979; PSYCHOL. REP.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 44; NO 2; PP. 517-518; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

PSYCHOLOGICAL ANDROGYNY AND ASSERTEVENESS IN FEMALESGAYTON WF; HAVU G; BAIRD JG et al.1983; PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS; ISSN 0033-2941; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 52; NO 1; PP. 283-285; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

CONSTRUCT VALIDATION OF THE BEM SEX ROLE INVENTORYCARLSSON M; MAGNUSSON E.1980; SCAND. J. PSYCHOL.; SWE; DA. 1980; VOL. 21; NO 1; PP. 27-31; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

FACTOR STRUCTURE OF THE BEM SEX-ROLE INVENTORY AND THE PERSONAL ATTRIBUTES QUESTIONNAIREGROSS R; BATLIS N; SMALL A et al.1979; J. CONSULTG CLIN. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 47; NO 6; PP. 1122-1124; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

FACTOR ANALYSIS OF MASCULINE AND FEMININE SEX-TYPED ITEMS FROM THE BEM SEX-ROLE INVENTORY.WATERS CW; WATERS LK; PINCUS S et al.1977; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 40; NO 2; PP. 567-570; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF THREE CONDITIONS OF ADMINISTRATION ON BEM SEX ROLE INVENTORY SCORESHINRICHSEN JJ; STONE L.1978; J. PERSONALITY ASSESS.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 42; NO 5; PP. 512; BIBL. 1 REF.Article

FEMININE AND MASCULINE DIMENSIONS OF THE TYPICAL, DESIRABLE, AND IDEAL WOMAN AND MAN.GILBERT LA; DEUTSCH CJ; STRAHAN RF et al.1978; SEX ROLES; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 4; NO 5; PP. 767-778; BIBL. 26 REF.Article

THE SEX ROLE IDENTITY OF MALE DRUG ABUSERSWEISS RW; RUSSAKOFF S.1978; J. CLIN. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 34; NO 4; PP. 1010-1013; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

SEX-ROLE ORIENTATION, STRESS, AND SUBSEQUENT HEALTH STATUS DEMONSTRATED BY TWO SCORING PROCEDURES FOR BEM'S SCALEWECH BA.1983; PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS; ISSN 0033-2941; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 52; NO 1; PP. 69-70; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

THE BEM SEX-ROLE INVENTORY REEXAMINEDSASSENRATH JM; YONGE GD.1979; PSYCHOL. REP.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 45; NO 3; PP. 935-941; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

ACQUIESCENCE AND THE BEM SEX-ROLE INVENTORYMILLIMET CR; VOTTA RP.1979; J. PERSONALITY ASSESS.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 43; NO 2; PP. 164-165; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

THE BEM SEX-ROLE INVENTORY: USE WITH CAUTION IF AT ALLYONGE GD.1978; PSYCHOL. REP.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 43; NO 3 PART. 2; PP. 1245-1246; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

ANALYSIS AND ABBREVIATION OF BEM'S SEX-ROLE INVENTORYLORR M; DIORIO M.1978; PSYCHOL. REP.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 43; NO 3 PART. 1; PP. 879-882; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

SEX-TYPING AND ANDROGYNY: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY.VANDEVER J.1977; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 40; NO 2; PP. 602; BIBL. 1 REF.Article

PSYCHOLOGICAL ANDROGYNY AND ASPECTS OF SELF-IMAGE IN WOMEN AND MENLEE AG; SCHEURER VL.1983; SEX ROLES; ISSN 0360-0025; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 9; NO 3; PP. 289-306; BIBL. 2 P.Article

PERCEPTIONS OF SEX ROLES OF YOUNG AND MIDDLE-AGED WOMEN AND MENETAUGH C; WEBER S.1982; PERCEPT. MOT. SKILLS; ISSN 0031-5125; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 55; NO 2; PP. 559-562; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

Die Bedeutung der Differenzierung von Instrumentalität und Expressivität nach Inhalt und Situation für die Beschreibung der Geschlechter. Ein kritischer Beitrag zur Verwendung des Sex Role Inventory von BEM = De l'importance de la différenciation entre l'instrumentalité et l'expressivité selon le contenu et la situation pour la description des sexes. Une étude critique sur l'utilisation du Sex Role Inventory de Bem = Description of the sexes by differentiating the concepts of instrumentality and expressivity in respect to content and context. A critical study to the logic of the Sex Role Inventory of BemSCHENK, J; HAHN, M.Psychologische Beiträge (Lengerich). 1987, Vol 29, Num 1, pp 164-182, issn 0033-3018Article

THE FACTOR STRUCTURE OF THE BEM SEX-ROLE INVENTORY: METHOD AND SAMPLE COMPARISONSANTILL JK; RUSSELL G.1982; AUST. J. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0004-9530; AUS; DA. 1982; VOL. 34; NO 2; PP. 183-193; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG SEX-ROLE ORIENTATION, COGNITIVE COMPLEXITY, AND TOLERANCE FOR AMBIGUITYROTTER NG; O'CONNELL AN.1982; SEX ROLES; ISSN 0360-0025; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 8; NO 12; PP. 1209-1220; BIBL. 24 REF.Article

BLACK AND WHITE FATHER'S ATTITUDES TOWARD CHILDREN'S SEX ROLESPRICE BONHAM S; SKEEN P.1982; PSYCHOL. REP.; ISSN 0033-2941; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 50; NO 3; PART. 2; PP. 1187-1190; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

BIRTH ORDER AND SEX-TYPESHAW JS; RODRIGUEZ W.1981; PSYCHOL. REP.; ISSN 0033-2941; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 48; NO 2; PP. 387-390; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

COMPARISON OF FACTORS FROM THE BEM SEX-ROLE INVENTORY FOR MALE AND FEMALE COLLEGE STUDENTSKIMLICKA TM; WAKEFIELD JA JR; FRIEDMAN AF et al.1980; PSYCHOL. REP.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 46; NO 3; PART. 1; PP. 1011-1017; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

A FACTOR ANALYTIC STUDY OF THE ITEMS IN THREE SELECTED SEX-ROLE INSTRUMENTSPEARSON JC.1980; PSYCHOL. REP.; ISSN 0033-2941; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 46; NO 3; PP. 1119-1126; BIBL. 2 P.Article