Pascal and Francis Bibliographic Databases

Help

Search results

Your search

kw.\*:("SON COMBINAISON")

Publication Year[py]

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Discipline (document) [di]

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Language

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Author Country

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Results 1 to 25 of 47

  • Page / 2
Export

Selection :

  • and

TWO HYPOTHESIS ON MONAURAL PHASE EFFECTSBUUNEN TJF.1975; ACUSTICA; ALLEM.; DA. 1975; VOL. 34; NO 2; PP. 98-105; ABS. ALLEM. FR.; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

PSYCHOPHYSICAL MEASUREMENTS RELATING SUPPRESSION AND COMBINATION TONESSHANNON RV; HOUTGAST T.1980; J. ACOUST. SOC. AM.; ISSN 0001-4966; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 68; NO 3; PP. 825-829; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

UNTERSUCHUNGEN ZU EINER SPRACHSYNTHESE AUS EINZELLAUTEN = ETUDES D'UNE SYNTHESE DE LA PAROLE A PARTIR DE SONS ISOLESBESIER HA; ENDRES WK.1978; FREQUENZ; DEU; DA. 1978; VOL. 32; NO 5; PP. 136-140; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

TONSTUFEN IN DER DUODEZIME. = DIVISION EN TREIZE TONS DE LA GAMME DIATONIQUEBOHLEN H.1978; ACUSTICA; ALLEM.; DA. 1978; VOL. 39; NO 2; PP. 76-86; ABS. ANGL. FR.; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

GROWTH OF L(F2-F1) AND L(2F1-F2) WITH INPUT LEVEL: INFLUENCE OF F2/F1HUMES LE.1980; HEARG RES.; NLD; DA. 1980; VOL. 2; NO 2; PP. 115-122; BIBL. 27 REF.Article

COMBINATION TONES AT FREQUENCIES GREATER THAN THE PRIMARY TONESZUREK PM; SACHS RM.1979; SCIENCE; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 205; NO 4406; PP. 600-602; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

COMBINATION BANDS OF EVEN ORDER: MASKING EFFECTS AND ESTIMATIONS OF LEVEL OF THE DIFFERENCE BANDS (FH-FL) AND 2(FH-FL)GREENWOOD DD.1972; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 52; NO 4, PART 2; PP. 1155-1167; BIBL. 18 REF.Serial Issue

PSYCHOPHYSICAL TUNING CURVES FOR COMBINATION TONES 2F1-F2 AND F2-F1FORMBY C; SACHS RM.1980; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 67; NO 5; PP. 1754-1758; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

TWO-TOME SUPPRESSION IN BACKWARD MASKING.TYLER RS; SMALL AM.1977; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 62; NO 1; PP. 215-218; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

MASKING BY COMBINATION BANDS: ESTIMATION OF THE LEVELS OF THE COMBINATION BANDS (N+1)FL-NFHGREENWOOD DD.1972; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 52; NO 4, PART 2; PP. 1144-1154; BIBL. 14 REF.Serial Issue

MASKING BY NARROW BANDS OF NOISE IN PROXIMITY TO MORE INTENSE PURE TONES OF HIGHER FREQUENCY: APPLICATION TO MEASUREMENT OF COMBINATION BAND LEVELS AND SOME COMPARISONS WITH MASKING BY COMBINATION NOISEGREENWOOD DD.1972; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 52; NO 4, PART 2; PP. 1137-1143; BIBL. 10 REF.Serial Issue

UNMASKING PRODUCED BY COMBINATION TONESTYLER RS; SMALL AM; ABBAS PJ et al.1979; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 66; NO 2; PP. 379-387; BIBL. 2 P.Article

THE GENERATION OF COMBINATION TONESJOHNSTONE JR.1980; HEAR. RES.; ISSN 0378-5955; NLD; DA. 1980; VOL. 3; NO 3; PP. 253-256; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

TWO-TONE UNMASKING IN THE FORWARD-MASKING PROCEDURE: SUPPRESSION OR PERCEPTUAL CUEING .LUTFI RA; YOST WA.1980; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 68; NO 2; PP. 700-702; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

IDENTIFICATION AND DISCRIMINATION OF THE RELATIVE ONSET TIME OF TWO COMPONENT TONES: IMPLICATIONS FOR VOICING PERCEPTION IN STOPS.PISONI DB.1977; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 61; NO 5; PP. 1352-1361; BIBL. 30 REF.Article

DIFFERENT BEHAVIOUR OF QUADRATIC AND CUBIC DIFFERENCE TONESZWICKER E.1979; HEARG RES.; NLD; DA. 1979; VOL. 1; NO 4; PP. 283-292; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

CORRELATES OF COMBINATION TONES OBSERVED IN THE RESPONSE OF NEURONS IN THE ANTEROVENTRAL COCHLEAR NUCLEUS OF THE CATSMOORENBURG GF; GIBSON MM; KITZES LM et al.1976; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 59; NO 4; PP. 945-962; BIBL. 37 REF.Article

ON THE ROLE OF COMBINATION TONES IN THE PERCEPTION OF THE SECOND EFFECT OF PITCH SHIFTBROOKES AJ.1982; ACUSTICA; ISSN 0001-7884; DEU; DA. 1982; VOL. 51; NO 2; PP. 90-98; ABS. GER/FRE; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

TONE-ON-TONE MASKING IN THE CHINCHILLALONG GR; MILLER JD.1981; HEAR. RES.; ISSN 0378-5955; NLD; DA. 1981; VOL. 4; NO 3-4; PP. 279-285; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

AURAL DISTORTION PRODUCT FE+FH: GROWTH RATE AND PHASE CHARACTERISTICS AT DIFFERENT FREQUENCIESERDREICH J.1980; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 68; NO 2; PP. 440-445; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

MEASUREMENT OF THE COMBINATION TONES F2-F1 AND 2F1-F2.ZUREK PM; LESHOWITZ BH.1976; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 60; NO 1; PP. 155-168; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

INTERAURAL PHASE DISCRIMINATION FOR COMBINATION TONE STIMULI.ZUREK PM; LESHOWITZ BH.1976; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 60; NO 1; PP. 169-172; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

MINIMUM DIFFERENCES OF LEVEL AND FREQUENCY FOR PERCEPTUAL FISSION OF TONE SEQUENCES ABAB.VAN NOORDEN LPAS.1977; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 61; NO 4; PP. 1041-1045; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

AUDITORY NERVE FIBER RESPONSES TO WIDE-BAND NOISE AND TONE COMBINATIONS.RHODE WS; GEISLER CD; KENNEDY DT et al.1978; J. NEUROPHYSIOL.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 41; NO 3; PP. 692-704; BIBL. 33 REF.Article

COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN PSYCHOPHYSICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENTS OF AURAL COMBINATION TONES.GOLDSTELN JL; BUCHSBAUM G; FURST M et al.1978; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 63; NO 2; PP. 474-485; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

  • Page / 2