TWO HYPOTHESIS ON MONAURAL PHASE EFFECTSBUUNEN TJF.1975; ACUSTICA; ALLEM.; DA. 1975; VOL. 34; NO 2; PP. 98-105; ABS. ALLEM. FR.; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

GROWTH OF L(F₂-F₁) AND L(2F₁-F₂) WITH INPUT LEVEL: INFLUENCE OF F₂/F₁HUMES LE.1980; HEARG RES.; NLD; DA. 1980; VOL. 2; NO 2; PP. 115-122; BIBL. 27 REF.Article

COMBINATION TONES AT FREQUENCIES GREATER THAN THE PRIMARY TONESZUREK PM; SACHS RM.1979; SCIENCE; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 205; NO 4406; PP. 600-602; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

COMBINATION BANDS OF EVEN ORDER: MASKING EFFECTS AND ESTIMATIONS OF LEVEL OF THE DIFFERENCE BANDS (F_H-F_L) AND 2(F_H-F_L)GREENWOOD DD.1972; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 52; NO 4, PART 2; PP. 1155-1167; BIBL. 18 REF.Serial Issue

PSYCHOPHYSICAL TUNING CURVES FOR COMBINATION TONES 2F₁-F₂ AND F₂-F₁FORMBY C; SACHS RM.1980; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 67; NO 5; PP. 1754-1758; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

TWO-TOME SUPPRESSION IN BACKWARD MASKING.TYLER RS; SMALL AM.1977; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 62; NO 1; PP. 215-218; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

MASKING BY COMBINATION BANDS: ESTIMATION OF THE LEVELS OF THE COMBINATION BANDS (N+1)F_L-NF_HGREENWOOD DD.1972; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 52; NO 4, PART 2; PP. 1144-1154; BIBL. 14 REF.Serial Issue

MASKING BY NARROW BANDS OF NOISE IN PROXIMITY TO MORE INTENSE PURE TONES OF HIGHER FREQUENCY: APPLICATION TO MEASUREMENT OF COMBINATION BAND LEVELS AND SOME COMPARISONS WITH MASKING BY COMBINATION NOISEGREENWOOD DD.1972; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 52; NO 4, PART 2; PP. 1137-1143; BIBL. 10 REF.Serial Issue

UNMASKING PRODUCED BY COMBINATION TONESTYLER RS; SMALL AM; ABBAS PJ et al.1979; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 66; NO 2; PP. 379-387; BIBL. 2 P.Article

IDENTIFICATION AND DISCRIMINATION OF THE RELATIVE ONSET TIME OF TWO COMPONENT TONES: IMPLICATIONS FOR VOICING PERCEPTION IN STOPS.PISONI DB.1977; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 61; NO 5; PP. 1352-1361; BIBL. 30 REF.Article

ON THE ROLE OF COMBINATION TONES IN THE PERCEPTION OF THE SECOND EFFECT OF PITCH SHIFTBROOKES AJ.1982; ACUSTICA; ISSN 0001-7884; DEU; DA. 1982; VOL. 51; NO 2; PP. 90-98; ABS. GER/FRE; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

AURAL DISTORTION PRODUCT FE+FH: GROWTH RATE AND PHASE CHARACTERISTICS AT DIFFERENT FREQUENCIESERDREICH J.1980; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 68; NO 2; PP. 440-445; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

MEASUREMENT OF THE COMBINATION TONES F₂-F₁ AND 2F₁-F₂.ZUREK PM; LESHOWITZ BH.1976; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 60; NO 1; PP. 155-168; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

MINIMUM DIFFERENCES OF LEVEL AND FREQUENCY FOR PERCEPTUAL FISSION OF TONE SEQUENCES ABAB.VAN NOORDEN LPAS.1977; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 61; NO 4; PP. 1041-1045; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN PSYCHOPHYSICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENTS OF AURAL COMBINATION TONES.GOLDSTELN JL; BUCHSBAUM G; FURST M et al.1978; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 63; NO 2; PP. 474-485; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

LOUDNESS OF PIPE ORGAN SOUNDS. I: PLENUM COMBINATIONSPOLLARD HF.1978; ACUSTICA; DEU; DA. 1978; VOL. 41; NO 2; PP. 65-74; ABS. GER/FRE; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

THE ROLE OF THE COMBINATION TONE F₁+F₂-F₃ IN THE PERCEPTION OF MONAURAL PHASE EFFECTS OF THREE-TONE COMPLEXESWEBER R.1981; ACUSTICA; ISSN 0001-7884; DEU; DA. 1981; VOL. 48; NO 1; PP. 23-30; ABS. GER/FRE; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

Raumplanerische Fragestellungen an die Gesamtgeräuschbetrachtung = Total noise investigations in the view of spatial planningSTEINEBACH, G; RUMBERG, M.Zeitschrift für Lärmbekämpfung. 2003, Vol 50, Num 3, pp 82-87, issn 0174-1098, 6 p.Article

The effect of amplitude envelopes of each amplitude modulated wave on the timbre of compound tones consisting of three amplitude modulated wavesIWAMIYA, S.Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan. E. 1995, Vol 16, Num 1, pp 21-27, issn 0388-2861Article

AUDITORY-NERVE FIBER ENCODING OF TWO-TONE APPROXIMATIONS TO STEADY-STATE VOWELSREALE RA; GEISLER CD.1980; J. ACOUST. SOC. AM.; ISSN 0001-4966; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 67; NO 3; PP. 891-902; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

RESPONSES OF FIBERS IN THE CAT'S AUDITORY NERVE TO THE CUBIC DIFFERENCE TONEBUUNEN TJF; RHODE WS.1978; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 64; NO 3; PP. 772-781; BIBL. 29 REF.Article

Combination of machine scores for automatic grading of pronunciation qualityFRANCO, H; NEUMEYER, L; DIGALAKIS, V et al.Speech communication. 2000, Vol 30, Num 2-3, pp 121-130, issn 0167-6393Article

Some neural mechanisms in the cat's auditory cortex underlying sensitivity to combined tone and wide-spectrum noise stimuliPHILLIPS, D. P; CYNADER, M. S.Hearing research. 1985, Vol 18, Num 1, pp 87-102, issn 0378-5955Article

Neural correlates of cubic difference tones in the medial geniculate body of the catHORNER, K; DE RIBAUPIERRE, Y; DE RIBAUPIERRE, F et al.Hearing research. 1983, Vol 11, Num 3, pp 343-357, issn 0378-5955Article

Relations among compression, suppression, and combination tones in mechanical responses of the basilar membrane : data and MBPNL modelGOLDSTEIN, J. L.Hearing research. 1995, Vol 89, Num 1-2, pp 52-68, issn 0378-5955Article