DO THE STANFORD SCALES TAP THE "CLASSIC SUGGESTION EFFECT".BOWERS KS.1981; INT. J. CLIN. EXP. HYPN.; ISSN 0020-7144; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 29; NO 1; PP. 42-53; ABS. GER/FRE/SPA; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

HYPNOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY SCALES UNDER ATTACK: AN EXAMINATION OF WEITZENHOFFER'S CRITICISMSHILGARD ER.1981; INT. J. CLIN. EXP. HYPN.; ISSN 0020-7144; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 29; NO 1; PP. 24-41; ABS. GER/FRE/SPA; BIBL. 34 REF.Article

A TAILORED SHSS: C, PERMITTING USER MODIFICATION FOR SPECIAL PURPOSESHILGARD ER; CRAWFORD HJ; BOWERS P et al.1979; INTERNATION. J. CLIN. EXPER. HYPNOS.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 27; NO 2; PP. 125-133; ABS. GER/FRE/SPA; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

ASSESSING HYPNOTIC RESPONSIVENESS IN A CLINICAL SETTING: A MULTI-ITEM CLINICAL SCALE AND ITS ADVANTAGES OVER SINGLE-ITEM SCALESHILGARD JR; HILGARD ER.1979; INTERNATION. J. CLIN. EXPER. HYPNOS.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 27; NO 2; PP. 134-150; ABS. GER/FRE/SPA; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

HYPNOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY AND PERSONALITY: THE CONSEQUENCES OF DIAZEPAM AND THE SEX OF THE SUBJECTS.GIBSON HB; CORCORAN ME; CURRAN JD et al.1977; BRIT. J. PSYCHOL.; G.B.; DA. 1977; VOL. 68; NO 1; PP. 51-59; BIBL. 15 REF.Article