DRUG USE SURVEYS: METHOD AND MADNESS.STANTON MD.1977; INTERNATION. J. ADDICT.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 12; NO 1; PP. 95-119; BIBL. 3 P.Article

FAMILY TREATMENT APPROACHES TO DRUG ABUSE PROBLEMS: A REVIEWSTANTON MD.1979; FAMILY PROCESS; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 18; NO 3; PP. 251-280; BIBL. 139 REF.Article

THE FAMILY AND DRUG MISURE: A BIBLIOGRAPHYSTANTON MD.1978; AMER. J. DRUG ALCOHOL ABUSE; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 5; NO 2; PP. 151-170; BIBL. 18 P.Article

A CRITIC OF THE WELLS AND DEZEN REVIEW OF THE RESULTS OF NONBEHAVIORAL FAMILY THERAPYSTANTON MD; TODD TC.1980; FAMILY PROCESS; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 19; NO 2; PP. 169-178; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

PATTERNS OF TURN-TAKING AND ALLIANCE FORMATION IN FAMILY COMMUNICATIONSTEIER F; STANTON MD; TODD TC et al.1982; JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION; ISSN 0021-9916; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 32; NO 3; PP. 148-160; BIBL. 24 REF.Article

ENGAGING "RESISTANT" FAMILIES IN TREATMENT. I: GETTING THE DRUG ADDICT TO RECRUIT HIS FAMILY MEMBERSVAN DEUSEN JM; SCOTT SM; STANTON MD et al.1980; INT. J. ADDICT.; ISSN 0020-773X; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 15; NO 7; PP. 1069-1089; BIBL. 1 P.Article