DESIGNING TWO FACTOR EXPERIMENTS FOR SELECTING INTERACTIONSSANTNER TJ.1981; J. STAT. PLANN. INFERENCE; ISSN 0378-3758; NLD; DA. 1981; VOL. 5; NO 1; PP. 45-55; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

A CHI-SQUARED/D.F. TEST FOR INTERACTION IN TWO-TREATMENT REPEATED MEASUREMENTS DESIGNSHSU LM.1980; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEASUR.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 40; NO 2; PP. 291-299; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

SOUS-MODELES INTERACTIFS RESPECTANT DES CONTRAINTES D'ORDREDENIS JB.1979; BIOMETR.-PRAXIMETR.; BEL; DA. 1979; VOL. 19; NO 3-4; PP. 49-58; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

A COMPARISON OF THE ADDITIVE AND MULTIPLICATIVE DEFINITIONS OF SECOND-ORDER INTERACTION IN 2 X 2 X 2 CONTINGENCY TABLESO'NEILL ME.1982; JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL COMPUTATION AND SIMULATION; ISSN 0094-9655; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 15; NO 1; PP. 33-50; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

ON INTERACTION CLASSIFICATIONLEIGH JH; KINNEAR TC.1980; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEAS.; ISSN 0013-1644; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 40; NO 4; PP. 841-843; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

ON GART'S TEST FOR INTERACTION OF SECOND ORDERBHAPKAR VP; VENABLE TC.1979; COMMUNIC. STATIST., THEORY METHODS; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 8; NO 5; PP. 463-470; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

A SIMPLE INTERACTION MODEL FOR TWO-DIMENSIONAL CONTINGENCY TABLESDALLAL GE.1982; J. AM. STAT. ASSOC.; ISSN 503568; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 77; NO 378; PP. 425-432; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

INTERACTIONS FOR DICHOTOMOUS VARIABLES IN REPEATED MEASURES DESIGNS.MARASCUILO LA; SERLIN R.1977; PSYCHOL. BULL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 84; NO 5; PP. 1002-1007; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

EMPIRICAL BAYES METHODS FOR A TWO-WAY MULTIPLICATIVE-INTERACTION MODELCHUANG C.1982; COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS. THEORY AND METHODS; ISSN 0361-0926; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 11; NO 25; PP. 2977-2989; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

DECOMPOSITION DES INTERACTIONS DANS UNE CORRESPONDANCE MULTIPLEBENER A.1982; CAHIERS DE L'ANALYSE DES DONNEES; ISSN 0339-3097; FRA; DA. 1982; VOL. 7; NO 1; PP. 25-32Article

A PARTITION OF A TWO-FACTOR INTERACTION, WITH AN AGRICULTURAL EXAMPLEMARTIN KJ.1980; APPL. STATIST.; GBR; DA. 1980; VOL. 29; NO 2; PP. 149-155; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

FACTORS AND RESPONSES IN MULTIDIMENSIONAL CONTINGENCY TABLES.UPTON G.1978; STATISTICIAN; G.B.; DA. 1978; VOL. 27; NO 1; PP. 43-48; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

A NOTE ON CURRENT METHODS OF PARTITIONING THE CONTINGENCY CHI ² STATISTIC.MURPHY BP.1978; J. STATIST. COMPUT. SIMUL.; G.B.; DA. 1978; VOL. 6; NO 3-4; PP. 157-167; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

TESTING FOR INTERACTION IN AN IXJXK CONTINGENCY TABLE.HALPERIN M; WARE JH; BYAR DP et al.1977; BIOMETRIKA; G.B.; DA. 1977; VOL. 64; NO 2; PP. 271-275; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

SELECTING THE LARGEST INTERACTION IN A TWO-FACTOR EXPERIMENT.BECHHOFER RE; SANTNER TJ; TURNBULL BW et al.1977; IN: STAT. DECIS. THEORY RELAT. TOP. II. SYMP. PROC.; LAFAYETTE, IND.; 1976; NEW YORK; ACADEMIC PRESS; DA. 1977; PP. 1-18; BIBL. 5 REF.Conference Paper

THE ASYMPTOTIC COVARIANCE OF TWO COUNTERS.KINGMAN JFC.1977; MATH. PROC. CAMBRIDGE PHILOS. SOC.; G.B.; DA. 1977; VOL. 82; NO 3; PP. 447-452; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

A PROCEDURE FOR OPTIMAL AUGMENTATION OF MULTIDIMENSIONAL DESIGN.CHAFFIN WW; SENNETTI JT; HINKELMANN K et al.1977; COMMUNIC. STATIST., THEORY METHODS; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 6; NO 7; PP. 679-689; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

A TEST FOR INTERACTION TERMS IN A SPLIT-PLOT DESIGN.SINGH N; THAN PE.1977; BIOMETR. J.; GERM.; DA. 1977; VOL. 19; NO 8; PP. 653-663; ABS. ALLEM.; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

ANALYSIS OF DESIGNS WITH TWO-WAY ELIMINATION OF HETEROGENEITY.SHAH KR.1977; J. STATIST. PLANNG INFER.; NETHERL.; DA. 1977; VOL. 1; NO 2; PP. 207-216; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

NONLINEAR TREATMENT-BY-TREATMENT INTERACTION MODEL.MILLIKEN GA; MACHADO LA.1976; BIOMETR. Z.; DTSCH.; DA. 1976; VOL. 18; NO 4; PP. 265-272; ABS. ALLEM.; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

TWO-GROUP COMPARISONS AND UNIVARIATE CLASSIFICATIONHUBERTY CJ; HOLMES SE.1983; EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT; ISSN 0013-1644; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 43; NO 1; PP. 15-26; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

PROPRIETES OPTIMALES DE CERTAINS ESTIMATEURS D'INTERACTION EN ANALYSE DE VARIANCE = OPTIMAL PROPERTIES OF CERTAIN INTERACTION ESTIMATORS IN ANALYSIS OF VARIATIONSROBERT CLAUDINE.1982; ; FRA; DA. 1982; 98 P.; 21 CM; BIBL. 11 REF.; TH. 3E CYCLE: MATH. APPL./GRENOBLE 1/1982Thesis

PRODUCT MODELS FOR FREQUENCY TABLES INVOLVING INDIRECT OBSERVATION.HABERMAN SJ.1977; ANN. STATIST.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 5; NO 6; PP. 1124-1147; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

COMPARATIVE MAGNITUDE OF SIMPLE EFFECTS AS AN INTERPRETIVE INDEX IN FACTORIAL ANOVA INTERACTIONS.GLASNAPP DR; SAULS J.1976; J. EXPER. EDUC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 45; NO 2; PP. 42-46; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

ON ANALYZING TWO-WAY AOV DATA WITH INTERACTION.HEGEMANN V; JOHNSON DE.1976; TECHNOMETRICS; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 18; NO 3; PP. 273-281; BIBL. 9 REF.Article