Pascal and Francis Bibliographic Databases

Help

Search results

Your search

kw.\*:("STIMULUS COMPLEXITY")

Filter

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Document Type [dt]

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Publication Year[py]

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Discipline (document) [di]

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Language

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Author Country

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Results 1 to 25 of 764

  • Page / 31
Export

Selection :

  • and

PSYCHOACOUSTIC AND EXPERIMENTAL DETERMINANTS OF TONAL CONSONANCEAYRES T; AESCHBACH S; WALKER EL et al.1980; J. AUD. RES.; ISSN 0021-9177; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 20; NO 1; PP. 31-42; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

HARMONIC STRUCTURE AS A DETERMINANT OF MELODIC ORGANIZATIONTAN N; AIELLO R; BEVER TG et al.1981; MEM. COGNIT.; ISSN 0090-502X; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 9; NO 5; PP. 533-539; BIBL. DISSEM.Article

IS RECOGNITION ACCURACY REALLY IMPAIRED WHEN THE TARGET IS REPEATED IN THE DISPLAY.ERIKSEN CW; MORRIS N; YEI YU YEH et al.1981; PERCEPT. PSYCHOPHYS.; ISSN 0031-5117; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 30; NO 4; PP. 375-385; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

COMPOSITE STIMULI ARE DETECTED BY GRATING DETECTORS RATHER THAN BY LINE DETECTORS.GLEZER VD; KOSTELYANETS NB; COOPERMAN AM et al.1977; VISION RES.; G.B.; DA. 1977; VOL. 17; NO 9; PP. 1067-1070; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

TERRITORIAL MARKING IN A GAME ARCADEWERNER CM; BROWN BB; DAMRON G et al.1981; J. PERS. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-3514; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 41; NO 6; PP. 1094-1104; BIBL. 1 P.Article

INFLUENCE OF SIX TYPES OF VISUAL STRUCTURE ON COMPLEXITY JUDGEMENTS IN CHILDREN AND ADULTSCHIPMAN SF; MENDELSON MJ.1979; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., HUM. PERCEPT. PERFORM.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 5; NO 2; PP. 365-378; BIBL. 24 REF.Article

ON CONSISTENCY OF COGNITIVE COMPLEXITY BETWEEN DIFFERENT GRIDSOHBUCHI K; HORIKE K.1978; JAP. PSYCHOL. RES.; JPN; DA. 1978; VOL. 20; NO 4; PP. 177-182; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

STIMULUS COMPLEXITY AND RATE OF ALTERNATION IN BINOCULAR RIVALRY.ROGERS RL; ROGERS SW; TOOTLE JS et al.1977; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 44; NO 2; PP. 669-670; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

ADJUSTING SYNTACTIC STRUCTURES TO VARIED LEVELS OF AUDIENCESMITH WL; BEVERLY SWAN M.1978; J. EXPER. EDUC.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 46; NO 4; PP. 29-34; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

KONTRASTEFFEKTE IN DER REZEPTION VON ROCKMUSIK MIT UNTERSCHIEDLICHER KOMPLEXITAET = EFFET DE CONTRASTE DANS L'AUDITION DE LA MUSIQUE ROCK A COMPLEXITE DIFFERENTENIKETTA R.1982; PSYCHOLOGISCHE BEITRAEGE; ISSN 0033-3018; DEU; DA. 1982; VOL. 24; NO 3; PP. 340-342; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

IS COGNITIVE COMPLEXITY LOQUACITY. A REPLY TO POWERS, JORDAN, AND STREETBURLESON BR; APPLEGATE JL; NEUWIRTH CM et al.1981; HUM. COMMUN. RES.; ISSN 0360-3989; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 7; NO 3; PP. 212-225; BIBL. 32 REF.Article

THE PERCEPTION OF COLLATIVE PROPERTIES IN VISUAL STIMULICUPCHIK GC; BERLYNE DE.1979; SCAND. J. PSYCHOL.; SWE; DA. 1979; VOL. 20; NO 2; PP. 93-104; BIBL. 27 REF.Article

ON THE NATURE OF METACONTRAST WITH COMPLEX TARGETS AND MASKS.MERIKLE PM.1977; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., HUM. PERCEPT. PERFORM.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 3; NO 4; PP. 607-621; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF RATER TRAINING AND PARTICIPATION ON COGNITIVE COMPLEXITY: AN EXPLORATION OF SCHNEIER'S COGNITIVE REINTERPRETATIONSAUSER WI JR; POND SB III.1981; PERS. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0031-5826; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 34; NO 3; PP. 563-577; BIBL. 2 P.Article

INTERSENSORY TRANSFER IN A COMPLEX LEARNING TASKMOHAN PJ.1981; J. GEN. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-1309; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 105; NO 1; PP. 165-166Article

THE EFFECT OF STIMULUS COMPLEXITY UPON THE FREQUENCY-AFFECT RELATIONSHIPVANBESELAERE N.1980; PSYCHOL. BELG.; BEL; DA. 1980; VOL. 20; NO 1; PP. 83-89; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

THE RATE OF "MENTAL ROTATION" OF IMAGES: A TEST OF A HOLISTIC ANALOGUE HYPOTHESISPYLYSHYN ZW.1979; MEMORY AND COGNIT.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 7; NO 1; PP. 19-28; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

STIMULUS COMPLEXITY AND CHOICE INCONSISTENCY AMONG GAMBLES.LINDMAN HR; LYONS J.1978; ORGANIZ. BEHAV. HUM. PERFORM.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 21; NO 2; PP. 146-159; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

COMPLEXITY AND STRUCTURE IN VISUAL PATTERNS.CHIPMAN SF.1977; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., GEN.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 106; NO 3; PP. 269-301; BIBL. 1 P.Article

PREDICTING BRAIN ORGANIZATION FROM DICHOTIC LISTENING PERFORMANCE: CORTICAL AND SUBCORTICAL FUNTIONAL ASYMMETRIES CONTRIBUTE TO PERCEPTUAL ASYMMETRIESSIDTIS JJ.1982; BRAIN AND LANGUAGE; ISSN 0093-934X; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 17; NO 2; PP. 287-300; BIBL. 2 P.Article

INTONATION CONTOUR AND SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE AS PREDICTORS OF APPARENT SEGMENTATION.GEERS AE.1978; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., HUM. PERCEPT. PERFORM.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 4; NO 2; PP. 273-283; BIBL. 24 REF.Article

THE USE OF NUMERICAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICAL METHODS IN THE ANALYSIS OF DATA ON LEARNING TO SEE COMPLEX RANDOM-DOT STEREOGRAMS.CLEVELAND WS; GUARINO R.1978; PERCEPTION; G.B.; DA. 1978; VOL. 7; NO 1; PP. 113-118; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

BOREDOM AND AROUSAL: COMPARISON OF TASKS DIFFERING IN VISUAL COMPLEXITY.BAILEY JP; THACKRAY RI; PEARL J et al.1976; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 43; NO 1; PP. 141-142; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

THE EFFECTS OF INCONGRUITY AND COMPLEXITY ON THE PERCEPTION OF HUMORHIRT M; GENSHAFT J.1982; PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES; ISSN 0191-8869; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 3; NO 4; PP. 453-455; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

CIRCULARITY IN RELATIVE PITCH JUDGMENTS FOR INHARMONIC COMPLEX TONES: THE SHEPARD DEMONSTRATION REVISITED, AGAINBURNS EM.1981; PERCEPT. PSYCHOPHYS.; ISSN 0031-5117; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 30; NO 5; PP. 467-472; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

  • Page / 31