Pascal and Francis Bibliographic Databases

Help

Search results

Your search

kw.\*:("STIMULUS FAMILIARITY")

Filter

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Document Type [dt]

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Publication Year[py]

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Discipline (document) [di]

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Language

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Author Country

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Results 1 to 25 of 1576

  • Page / 64

Export

Selection :

  • and

TAIL PINCH-INDUCED EATING DOES GENERALIZE TO A NONPREFERRED BUT FAMILIAR FOODGUDER LD; KORNBLITH CL.1979; PHYSIOL. AND BEHAV.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 22; NO 1; PP. 179-183; BIBL. 24 REF.Article

REPETITION AND RATED TRUTH VALUE OF STATEMENTSSCHWARTZ M.1982; AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY (THE); ISSN 0002-9556; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 95; NO 3; PP. 393-407; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

THE PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT OF NAMESZWEIGENHAFT RL; HAYES KN; HAAGEN CH et al.1980; J. SOC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 110; NO 2; PP. 203-210; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

CHICKS' RESPONSES TO FAMILIAR STIMULI IN UNFAMILIAR ENVIRONMENTSSLUCKIN W; BERRYMAN JC; MAYES A et al.1979; QUART. J. EXPER. PSYCHOL.; GBR; DA. 1979; VOL. 31; NO 4; PP. 701-710; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

RESPONSIVENESS TO "SOCIAL" RELEASERS IN CATTLE. II. RELATION BETWEEN SOCIAL STATUS AND RESPONSIVENESS AND POSSIBLE EFFECT OF PREVIOUS FAMILIARIZATION WITH THE TEST CONDITIONSSOFFIE M; ZAYAN R.1978; BEHAV. PROCESS.; NLD; DA. 1978; VOL. 3; NO 3; PP. 241-258; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

PERCEPTION AND COMPREHENSION OF SOME PICTORIAL SYMBOLS AS A FUNCTION OF FAMILIARITY AND NATURE OF DEPICTED OBJECTMISHRA RC.1982; PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS; ISSN 0031-5125; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 55; NO 3; PART 1; PP. 962; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

MAINTENANCE OF ORIENTATION DURING LOCOMOTION IN UNFAMILIAR ENVIRONMENTSBOOK A; GARLING T.1981; J. EXP. PSYCHOL., HUM. PERCEPT. PERFORM.; ISSN 0096-1523; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 7; NO 5; PP. 995-1006; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

INTEREST OF MICE IN CONSPECIFIC MALE ODOURS IS INFLUENCED BY DEGREE OF KINSHIPGILDER PM; SLATER PJB.1978; NATURE; GBR; DA. 1978; VOL. 274; NO 5669; PP. 364-365; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

OPEN-FIELD RESPONSES OF DOMESTIC CHICKS IN THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF FAMILIAR CUESJONES RB.1977; BEHAV. PROCESS.; NLD; DA. 1977; VOL. 2; NO 4; PP. 315-323; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

EFFECTS OF STIMULUS INCONGRUITY, TASK DEMAND, AND INDUCED INVOLVEMENT ON AMPLITUDE OF GSR.SHACKEL DSJ.1976; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 43; NO 3 PART. 2; PP. 1111-1121; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

ROLE OF RHETORICAL STRUCTURE IN TEXT COMPREHENSIONKINTSCH W; YARBROUGH JC.1982; JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0022-0663; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 74; NO 6; PP. 828-834; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

THE EFFECT OF FAMILIARITY ON PREFERENCES FOR SURNAMESCOLMAN AM; SLUCKIN W; HARGREAVES DJ et al.1981; BR. J. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0007-1269; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 72; NO 3; PP. 363-369; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

THE LIMITED READABILITY OF LANSDELL NUMERALS.SMITH SL.1978; HUM. FACTORS; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 20; NO 1; PP. 57-64; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

FAMILIARITY OF BACKGROUND CHARACTERS IN VISUAL SCANNING.REICHER GM; SNYDER CRR; RICHARDS JT et al.1976; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., HUM. PERCEPT. PERFORM.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 2; NO 4; PP. 522-530; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

TYPE OF INFORMATION, FAMILIARITY AND THE REDUCTION OF CROWDING STRESSBAUM A; FISHER JD; SOLOMON SK et al.1981; J. PERS. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-3514; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 40; NO 1; PP. 11-23; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

LA CONCEPTUALISATION DU TEXTE DANS LES PROCESSUS DE COMPREHENSIONCHISTYAKOVA GD.1981; VOPR. PSIHOL.; ISSN 0042-8841; SUN; DA. 1981; NO 4; PP. 50-59; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

THE EFFECTS OF BACKGROUND FAMILIARITY IN VISUAL SEARCH: AN ANALYSIS OF UNDERLYING FACTORS.RICHARDS JT; REICHER GM.1978; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 23; NO 6; PP. 499-505; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

VISUALIZATION OF COMPOUND SCENES.BEECH JR; ALLPORT DA.1978; PERCEPTION; G.B.; DA. 1978; VOL. 7; NO 2; PP. 129-138; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

VISUAL OBSERVING BY RHESUS MONKEYS: INFLUENCE OF POTENTIALLY THREATENING STIMULI.HAUDE RH; DETWILER DH.1976; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 43; NO 1; PP. 231-237; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

MEDIATING FACTORS IN CHICK SOCIAL PECKING. I. EFFECTS OF ISOLATION, IMPRINTING, AND PEER CONTACTRAJECKI DW; NERENZ DR; REIN B et al.1978; AGGRESS. BEHAV.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 4; NO 2; PP. 141-151; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

A TEST OF THE SOPHISTICATED GUESSING THEORY OF WORD PERCEPTION.JOHNSTON JC.1978; COGNIT. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 10; NO 2; PP. 123-153; BIBL. 2 P. 1/2Article

DETERMINANTS OF NORMAL VARIATION IN INFANTS' NEGATIVE REACTIONS TO UNFAMILIAR ADULTS.HARMON RJ; MORGAN GA; KLEIN RP et al.1977; J. CHILD PSYCHIATRY; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 16; NO 4; PP. 670-683; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

CATEGORY SIZE, FEATURE COMPARISON, AND THE COMPREHENSION OF FIGURATIVE PROPOSITIONS.MALGADY RG.1976; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 42; NO 3 PART. 1; PP. 811-818; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

THE EFFECT OF FAMILIARITY ON THE PROCESSING OF FRAGMENTED FIGURES.HOCK HS; MARCUS N.1976; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 20; NO 5; PP. 375-379; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF STIMULUS COMPLEXITY AND FAMILIARIZATION TIME ON INFANT PREFERENCES FOR NOVEL AND FAMILIAR STIMULIHUNTER MA; AMES EW; KOOPMAN R et al.1983; DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0012-1649; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 19; NO 3; PP. 338-352; BIBL. 1 P.Article

  • Page / 64