PRESERVATION AND CHANGE OF HUE, BRIGHTNESS, AND FORM IN APPARENT MOTIONNAVON D.1983; BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY; ISSN 0090-5054; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 21; NO 2; PP. 131-134; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

THE ROLE OF STIMULUS MOVEMENT PATTERNS IN THE PREY CATCHING BEHAVIOR OF HYDROMANTES GENEI (AMPHIBIA, PLETHODONTIDAE).ROTH G.1978; J. COMP. PHYSIOL.; DEU; DA. 1978; VOL. 123; NO 3; PP. 261-264; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

MOTION PARALLAX IN THE PERCEPTION OF MOVEMENT BY A MOVING SUBJECTGOODSON FE; SNIDER TQ; SWEARINGEN JE et al.1980; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; ISSN 0090-5054; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 16; NO 2; PP. 87-88; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

A MODEL OF PERCEIVED DIRECTION OF ADAPTED MOTION.CHUN CHIANG.1977; JAP. PSYCHOL. RES.; JAP.; DA. 1977; VOL. 19; NO 4; PP. 184-186; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

DIVERGENCE THRESHOLDS AS FUNCTIONS OF TEMPORAL SEPARATION, SPATIAL SEPARATION, AND RETINAL LOCUSDI ORIO MJ; HARRINGTON TL.1983; PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS; ISSN 0031-5125; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 56; NO 2; PP. 459-468; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

AGE, SEX AND TIME OF DAY EFFECTS ON THE DURATION OF THE MOVEMENT AFTER-EFFECTHARRIS JP.1983; BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0007-1269; GBR; DA. 1983; VOL. 74; NO 2; PP. 233-238; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

THE ORIGIN OF PATTERN INFORMATION OF AN APPARENTLY MOVING OBJECT DURING STROBOSCOPIC MOTIONVON GRUNAU MW.1981; PERCEPT. PSYCHOPHYS.; ISSN 0031-5117; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 30; NO 4; PP. 357-361; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

VELOCITY AFTER-EFFECTS: THE EFFECTS OF ADAPTATION TO MOVING STIMULI ON THE PERCEPTION OF SUBSEQUENTLY SEEN MOVING STIMULITHOMPSON P.1981; VIS. RES. (OXF.); ISSN 0042-6989; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 21; NO 3; PP. 337-345; BIBL. 34 REF.Article

VISUAL INFORMATION ABOUT MOVING OBJECTSTODD JT.1981; J. EXP. PSYCHOL., HUM. PERCEPT. PERFORM.; ISSN 0096-1523; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 7; NO 4; PP. 795-810; BIBL. 2 P.Article

ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS TO KINETIC STIMULUS TRANSFORMATIONSROCK I; SMITH D.1981; J. EXP. PSYCHOL., HUM. PERCEPT. PERFORM.; ISSN 0096-1523; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 7; NO 1; PP. 19-29; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

A TEST OF FITTS' LAW WITH MOVING TARGETSJAGACINSKI RJ; REPPERGER DW; WARD SL et al.1980; HUM. FACTORS; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 22; NO 2; PP. 225-233; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

ATTENTION DEMANDS OF MOVEMENTS AS A FUNCTION OF THEIR DURATION AND VELOCITYNEWELL KM; HOSHIZAKI LEF.1980; ACTA PSYCHOL.; NLD; DA. 1980; VOL. 44; NO 1; PP. 59-69; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FLIGHT SIMULATOR MOTION AND TRAINING REQUIREMENTSCARO PW.1979; HUM. FACTORS; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 21; NO 4; PP. 493-501; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

LA REGULATION DU MOUVEMENT: L'EFFET DE LA RETROACTION VISUELLE SUR LA VITESSE ET LA PRECISION DANS LE DESSIN DES LIGNESNOGUCHI M.1979; J. FAC. EDUC., SHINSHU UNIV.; JPN; DA. 1979; NO 39; PP. 25-33; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

ICONIC PERSISTENCE AND PERCEPTUAL MOMENT AS DETERMINANTS OF TEMPORAL INTEGRATION IN VISIONDI LOLLO V; WILSON AE.1978; VISION RES.; GBR; DA. 1978; VOL. 18; NO 12; PP. 1607-1610; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

LOIS DE LA DIRECTION ET PARTICULARITES INDIVIDUELLES DE L'ACTIVITE DANS LES REACTIONS A L'OBJET EN MOUVEMENTLISENKOVA VP; SHEJKMAN GI; YAKOVLEVA GN et al.1976; EKSPER. PRIKL. PSIKHOL.; S.S.S.R.; DA. 1976; NO 7; PP. 51-58; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF COMPENSATORY MOVEMENT STIMULATION ON THE SLEEP-WAKE BEHAVIORS OF PRETERM INFANTSEDELMAN AH; KRAEMER HC; KORNER AF et al.1982; JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD PSYCHIATRY; ISSN 0002-7138; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 21; NO 6; PP. 555-559; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

THE MINIMUM PRINCIPLE AND THE PERCEPTION OF ABSOLUTE, COMMON, AND RELATIVE MOTIONSCUTTING JE; PROFFITT DR.1982; COGNIT. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0010-0285; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 14; NO 2; PP. 211-246; BIBL. 3 P.Article

DETECTION OF DISPLACEMENT DURING SACCADES: SPATIAL AND FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENCES ALLIED TO PREPROGRAMMINGHEYWOOD S.1981; ACT. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0001-6918; NLD; DA. 1981; VOL. 48; NO 1-3; PP. 141-149; BIBL. 4 REF.Conference Paper

THE PERCEPTION OF SURFACE ROUGHNESS BY ACTIVE AND PASSIVE TOUCHLEDERMAN SJ.1981; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; ISSN 0090-5054; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 18; NO 5; PP. 253-255; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

EVENT PERCEPTIONJOHANSSON G; VON HOFSTEN C; JANSSON G et al.1980; ANNU. REV. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 31; PP. 27-63; BIBL. 7 P.Article

PERCEPTION OF IMAGES MOVING AT SACCADIC VELOCITIES DURING SACCADES AND DURING FIXATIONBROOKS BA; YATES JT; COLEMAN RD et al.1980; EXPER. BRAIN RES.; DEU; DA. 1980; VOL. 40; NO 1; PP. 71-78; BIBL. 39 REF.Article

PROPRIOCEPTIVE INFORMATION ABOUT TARGET LOCATION SUPPRESSES AUTOKINESIS.LACKNER JR; ZABKAR JJ.1977; VISION RES.; G.B.; DA. 1977; VOL. 17; NO 10; PP. 1225-1229; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

THE ANGLE OF VISUAL ROLL MOTION DETERMINES DISPLACEMENT OF SUBJECTIVE VISUAL VERTICAL.MAURITZ KH; DICHGANS J; HUFSCHMIDT A et al.1977; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 22; NO 6; PP. 557-562; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

ADJACENCY AND ATTENTION AS DETERMINERS OF PERCEIVED MOTION.GOGEL WC; TIETZ JD.1976; VISION RES.; G.B.; DA. 1976; VOL. 16; NO 8; PP. 839-845; BIBL. 19 REF.Article