EFFET DU JUGEMENT DE L'EXPERIMENTATEUR SUR LA SIGNIFICATION DE L'EXPERIENCE POUR UN SUJETALAPHILIPPE D.1980; BULL. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0007-4403; FRA; DA. 1980-1981; VOL. 34; NO 352; PP. 941-946; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

SOME RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTERVIEWERS' PERSONAL FEELINGS ABOUT CANDIDATES AND THEIR GENERAL EVALUATION OF THEM.KEENAN A.1977; J. OCCUP. PSYCHOL.; G.B.; DA. 1977; VOL. 50; NO 4; PP. 275-283; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

EXPERIMENTER BIAS EFFECTS: A DIRECT REPLICATIONCIPANI E; WAITE VA.1980; PERCEPT. MOT. SKILLS; ISSN 0031-5125; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 51; NO 1; PP. 129-130; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

SUBJECT-DEFINED VS. EXPERIMENTER-DEFINED CONFLICT.RINGUETTE EL; SCHILL TR.1977; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 9; NO 3; PP. 181-182; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

THE ROLE OF THE EXPERIMENTER IN OBSERVED SEX DIFFERENCES IN CONSERVATION ACQUISITION.MCMAHAN ED.1976; J. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 94; NO 2; PP. 205-206; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

SELF-DISCLOSURE AS A FUNCTION OF EXPERIMENTER'S SELF-DISCLOSURE, EXPERIMENTER'S SEX AND SUBJECT'S SEXO'KELLEY FR; SCHULDT WJ.1981; PERCEPT. MOT. SKILLS; ISSN 0031-5125; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 52; NO 2; PP. 557-558; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

POSSIBLE PSYCHOLOGICAL RESPONSES TO PARTICIPATION IN A PSI EXPERIMENTWEINER DH.1979; PARAPSYCHOL. REV.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 10; NO 2; PP. 12-14; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

RESPONSIE-BEREIDHEID EU DE BELANGSTELLING VOOR ONDERZOEK = LES SUJETS D'EXPERIENCE, LEUR DISPOSITION A PARTICIPER ET LEUR INTERET POUR LA RECHERCHEVAN HEERDEN J; HOOGSTRATEN J.1979; NEDERL. T. PSYCHOL.; NLD; DA. 1979; VOL. 34; NO 5; PP. 319-329; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

DETERMINANTS OF CONFIRMING AND DISCONFIRMING RESPONSES TO NEGATIVE SOCIAL LABELS.GURWITZ SB; TOPOL B.1978; J. EXPER. SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 14; NO 1; PP. 31-42; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

THE REALITY OF HYPNOTIC ANALGESIA: A COMPARISON OF HIGHLY HYPNOTIZABLES WITH SIMULATORS.HILGARD ER; MACDONALD H; MORGAN AH et al.1978; J. ABNORM. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 87; NO 2; PP. 239-246; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

EXPERIMENTER PRESTIGE AND FEEDBACK RELATED TO ACCEPTANCE OF GENUINE PERSONALITY INTERPRETATIONS AND SELF-ATTITUDE.BRADLEY GW; BRADLEY LA.1977; J. PERSONALITY ASSESS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 41; NO 2; PP. 178-185; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

QUESTIONNAIRE ET SEDIMENTATION DES RAPPORTS SOCIAUX: UN EXEMPLETROGNON A.1977; BULL. PSYCHOL.; FRA; DA. 1977-1978; VOL. 31; NO 334; PP. 412-420; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

RACIAL EFFECTS IN COUNSELING-LIKE INTERVIEWS: AN EXPERIMENTAL ANALOGUE.WOODS E JR; ZIMMER JM.1976; J. COUNSELG PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 23; NO 6; PP. 527-531; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

INTROVERSION-EXTRAVERSION AND EXPERIMENTER EFFECTS IN MEMORY TASKSRICHARDSON JTE.1982; PERS. INDIVID. DIFFER.; ISSN 0191-8869; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 3; NO 3; PP. 327-328; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

RATER COMPETITIVENESS AND THE EXPERIMENTER'S INFLUENCE ON RATINGS OF A FUTURE OPPONENTBOND MH; CHI CHIU HUI H.1982; PSYCHOLOGIA; ISSN 0033-2852; JPN; DA. 1982; VOL. 25; NO 2; PP. 91-99; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

STUDENT PERCEPTIONS OF AND EXPECTATIONS FOR MALE AND FEMALE INSTRUCTORS: EVIDENCE RELATING TO THE QUESTION OF GENDER BIAS IN TEACHING EVALUATIONBENNETT SK.1982; J. EDUC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-0663; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 74; NO 2; PP. 170-179; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

ARE WE SHAMANS OR SCIENTISTS.STANFORD RG.1981; J. AM. SOC. PSYCH. RES. (1932); ISSN 0003-1070; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 75; NO 1; PP. 61-70; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

SUR LA PROBLEMATIQUE DE LA SITUATION DE TEST PSYCHOLOGIQUE EN PSYCHIATRIEFESTA B; MEJEAN C.1979; PSYCHOL. MED.; FRA; DA. 1979; VOL. 11; NO 4; PP. 737-740; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

COMPARISON OF A WRITTEN FEEDBACK PROCEDURE, GROUP BRAINSTORMING, AND INDIVIDUAL BRAINSTORMING.MADSEN DB; FINGER JR JR.1978; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 63; NO 1; PP. 120-123; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

VIGILANCE PERFORMANCE AS RELATED TO TASK INSTRUCTIONS, COACTION, AND KNOWLEDGE OF RESULTSHUNTERMARK JM; WITTE KL.1978; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 12; NO 4; PP. 325-328; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

WHY RESEARCHERS DON'T STUDY WOMEN: THE RESPONSES OF 62 RESEARCHERSPRESCOTT S.1978; SEX ROLES; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 4; NO 6; PP. 899-905; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

DE L'HETEROGENEITE DANS LES QUESTIONNAIRES FERMESTROGNON A; ARNAULD S.1977; BULL. PSYCHOL.; FRA; DA. 1977-1978; VOL. 31; NO 334; PP. 421-429; BIBL. 24 REF.Article

THE RELATIONSHIP OF EXPERIMENTER EXPECTANCY TO PERFORMANCE ON ESP TASKS.TADDONIO JL.1976; J. PARAPSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 40; NO 2; PP. 107-114; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

EXPERIMENTER EFFECTS IN BIOFEEDBACK TRAININGFREEMAN FE; GONZALEZ D; MONTGOMERY GT et al.1983; JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0022-4545; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 119; NO 1; PP. 119-123; BIBL. 10 REF.Conference Paper

MENTAL HEALTH ATTITUDES AND VOLUNTEERINGWAHL OF; BRIGGS D; ZASTOWNY T et al.1980; PSYCHOL. REP.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 46; NO 3; PART. 1; PP. 966; BIBL. 3 REF.Article