REVIEW OF RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN STEERING WHEEL REVERSAL RATE AND DRIVING TASK DEMANDMACDONALD WA; HOFFMANN ER.1980; HUM. FACTORS; ISSN 0018-7208; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 22; NO 6; PP. 733-739; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

LES PROBLEMES PSYCHOLOGIQUES POSES PAR L'APPRENTISSAGEMASHBITS EI.1979; VOPR. PSIKOL.; SUN; DA. 1979; NO 6; PP. 96-104; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

FEEDBACK AND TASK PREDICTABILITY AS DETERMINANTS OF PERFORMANCE IN MULTIPLE CUE PROBABILITY LEARNING TASKS.SCHMITT N; COYLE BW; KING L et al.1976; ORGANIZ. BEHAV. HUM. PERFORM.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 16; NO 2; PP. 388-402; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

CHANGES IN THE REALISM AND DISTRIBUTION OF PROBABILITY ASSESSMENTS AS A FUNCTION OF QUESTION TYPEWRIGHT G.1982; ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA; ISSN 0001-6918; NLD; DA. 1982; VOL. 52; NO 1-2; PP. 165-174; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

THE ROLE OF TASK COMPLEXITY IN PK. A REVIEW.KENNEDY JE.1978; J. PARAPSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 42; NO 2; PP. 89-122; BIBL. 3 P.Article

WHEN IS AN EASY TASK DIFFICULT AND VICE VERSA. A REPLY TO LANE.KANTOWITZ BH; KNIGHT JL JR.1978; ACTA PSYCHOL.; PAYS-BAS; DA. 1978; VOL. 42; NO 2; PP. 163-170; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

EFFECT OF TASK DIFFICULTY AND ANGLE IN A POSITIONING TASK INVOLVING SYMMETRICAL AND ASYMMETRICAL MOTIONSRAOUF A; TSUCHIYA K; MOROOKA K et al.1982; INT. J. PROD. RES.; ISSN 0020-7543; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 20; NO 6; PP. 765-773; ABS. FRE/GER; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

ANALYSE DES DEMANDES PERCEPTIVO-MOTRICES DES TACHES SPORTIVESALAIN C; SALMELLA J.1980; CAH. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0373-8965; FRA; DA. 1980; VOL. 23; NO 1-2; PP. 77-86Article

EFFETS DE STRESS A LONG TERME, DE LEUR SUPPRESSION BRUSQUE ET DE LEUR REPRISEAJRAPETYANTS MG; GEKHT K; LEVSHINA IP et al.1980; ZH. VYSSH. NEW. DEJATELN. I.P. PAVLOVA; SUN; DA. 1980; VOL. 30; NO 1; PP. 49-54; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

EVALUATING THE SENSITIVITY OF VARIOUS MEASURES OF OPERATOR WORKLOAD USING RANDOM DIGITS AS A SECONDARY TASKSAVAGE RE; WIERWILLE WW; CORDES RE et al.1978; HUM. FACTORS; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 20; NO 6; PP. 649-654; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

LEARNING BY DISCOVERY: INCIDENTAL LEARNING AND PRESENTATION OF RULEHERMAN GD.1978; PSYCHOL. REP.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 43; NO 3 PART. 1; PP. 732-734; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

PRESENTATION BY ORDER OF DIFFICULTY OF TEST TASKS TO PERSONS WITH APHASIADUMOND DL; HARDY JC; VAN DEMARK AA et al.1978; J. SPEECH HEARG RES.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 21; NO 2; PP. 350-360; BIBL. 28 REF.Article

DIFFICULT EXTUBATION OF AN ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE CUFF.YEW T; DATTA TD.1976; ANESTH. AND ANALG.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 55; NO 6; PP. 876-877; BIBL. 1 REF.Article

DIFFICULTY IN INTUBATION.CHANDRA VIR SINGH; KAMRA GL.1977; BRIT. J. ANAESTH.; G.B.; DA. 1977; VOL. 49; NO 6; PP. 639-640; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

THE EFFECTS OF PARTICIPATION AND GOAL DIFFICULTY ON PERFORMANCELATHAM GP; STEELE TP; SAARI LM et al.1982; PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0031-5826; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 35; NO 3; PP. 677-686; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

DIGITS OF EQUIVALENT DIFFICULTY IN THE SERIAL SUBTRACTION TESTMOORE PN; PIERCE D; GRAYBILL D et al.1980; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 50; NO 3; PART. 1; PP. 940-942; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONSUMMATORY VALUE OF SUCCESS AND ACHIEVEMENT-TASK DIFFICULTYBLANKENSHIP V.1982; J. PERS. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-3514; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 42; NO 6; PP. 901-914; BIBL. 30 REF.Article

WHAT MAKES A TASK DIFFICULT. A STUDY OF THE RELATION BETWEEN TASK REQUIREMENTS, TASK PERFORMANCE, AND PERCEIVED DIFFICULTYWAERN Y.1982; PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH; ISSN 0340-0727; DEU; DA. 1982; VOL. 44; NO 4; PP. 393-408; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

COMPLIANCE AS AFFECTED BY TASK DIFFICULTY AND ORDER OF TASKSGOLDMAN M; GIER JA; SMITH DE et al.1981; J. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-4545; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 114; NO 1; PP. 75-83; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

EXPERIENCE OF DURATION AS A FUNCTION OF NUMBER OF RESPONSES, TASK DIFFICULTY, AND SEXMARTIN GA; SHUMATE M; FRAUENFELDER K et al.1981; PERCEPT. MOT. SKILLS; ISSN 0031-5125; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 53; NO 1; PP. 139-145; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

LEVEL OF ANALYSIS IN THE PERCEPTION OF ONGOING INSTRUCTION: AN EXPLORATORY STUDYKOOPMAN C; NEWTSON D.1981; J. EDUC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-0663; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 73; NO 2; PP. 212-223; BIBL. 28 REF.Article

EMPIRICAL EXAMINATIONS OF THE RETENTION INTERVAL HYPOTHESIS: COMPARISONS OF LEARNING METHODS WHEN LEARNING IS DIFFICULTIZAWA C.1980; J. GEN. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 103; NO 1; PP. 117-129; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

PEOPLE'S ANALYSES OF THE CAUSES OF ABILITY-LINKED PERFORMANCESDARLEY JM; GOETHALS GR.1980; ADV. EXP. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0065-2601; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 13; PP. 1-37; BIBL. 3 P.Article

POLICE VISION STANDARDSSHEEDY JE.1980; J. POLICE SCI. ADM.; ISSN 0090-9084; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 8; NO 3; PP. 275-285; BIBL. 35 REF.Article

STANDARDIZING PERCEIVED TASK DIFFICULTY FOR STUDIES OF CHEATING: A METHODOLOGICAL REFINEMENT AND SAMPLE TASKSMONTE CF; FISH JM.1980; PERCEPT. MOT. SKILLS; ISSN 0031-5125; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 51; NO 1; PP. 311-317; BIBL. 16 REF.Article